I think you're suggesting that the LGTBQ community considers itself to be above the law.
Nope. I am outright stating that they consider themselves eternal victims. Why? Because they feel entitled to supremacy, and at every corner, at every turn, there is always someone trying to chop them down to equality. Hence they are always screaming "We are so OPPRESSED!" and "We are such VICTIMS!". If, during a Pride Parade, one naked man gets on his knees to give a blowjob to another naked man, in public, in front of children, the police can either 1. do nothing because they know there will be HELL TO PAY if they take action, or 2. take action to arrest/detain them while the entire world and the entire internet explodes with condemnation at the law enforcement CRACKDOWN on LGBT, trampling their rights and VICTIMIZING them in their OPPRESSION.
Yes, they have supremacy. Period.
I think that, for the most part, this is not a view that members of this community hold.
Are you saying that they pretty much have deluded themselves into believing that they are VICTIMS who are being VICTIMIZED by their VICTIMIZERS, always and forever, and that's their story and their sticking to it i.e. the exact opposite of thinking of themselves as privileged supremacists? OK, you have a point. I'll buy that.
As far as the breaking of laws are concerned, I consider public indecency to generally be low on the severity scale.
I consider harming children to be very high on the severity scale. In fact, most people do. Did you catch the "12B" discussion going on? Do you know what that's all about? Someone, such as myself, who is not some sort of supremacist, understands that I should keep my sexual activity private and not impose it on others in public, hence public indecency laws. The LGBTQIAXXXXXXXXXXXX+ movement feels that this does not work for them, i.e. that they should be able to harm children all they want in public with overt sexual activity. They're supremacists, after all. Of course they consider their own violations of laws to be "low on the severity scale" whereas if they do it, it shouldn't be considered violating the law; that's strictly for straight people.
People can ofcourse lobby politicians to be more vigilant in the enforcement of public indecency laws
Translation: People, and jurisdictions (like Russia), can simply deny the supremacists their supremacy, and let them bitch and gripe and complain and whine about being OPPRESSED, PERSECUTED VICTIMIZED VICTIMS. It's going to happen anyway.
Personally, I think there are other issues that deserve more attention.
Nope. There is no reason to allow supremacists to harm our children and our society just because there might be something more important going on in the world. It fully deserves our attention. That's worth repeating: It fully deserves our attention, not mere dismissal.
Russia is doing the right thing.
I recently started watching a film concerning the killing of Trayvor Martin by
George Zimmerman called Origin on Netflix.
Tell me about how that event was portrayed. Was Trayvon Martin portrayed as a piece of shit thug who fully deserved getting wasted, and that the world is so much better now that we are rid of him? I have not seen the movie, but based on your previous posts, I'm going to make a prediction: 1) The movie you saw did
not correctly portray Trayvon Martin in this light and 2) you didn't do any independent research, being content to simply embrace the propaganda as it was handed to you. Am I correct?
I consider killing someone without just cause and not being appropriately disciplined to be decidedly more important.
... or you consider propaganda-based self-delusion to be decidedly more important. Which is it really?
The trailer fo the film is here if you'd like to see it:
I watched the trailer. The number of red flags that went up didn't fit in my house.
p.s. - if you ever decide to do you own research, watch the Zimmerman trial and see the real reason he was totally exonerated.