Yes, you faggots have done well in your commie censorship drives; nobody is denying that. You faggots need to leave the country and move to some more deviant friendly countries.
I don't know what a "faggot" is, but I do know that only ignorant, uneducated, backwoods slugs use the term. By the way, I'm not going anywhere, motherfucker. This is my country. I will be alive a lot longer than you will be, praise the gods.
 
Again, I've seen no evidence that "LGBTIAX..." exists
I recognize your denial of LGBTQQIAXXXXXXXX+. You'll find that I'm very easy. With me, you can deny the existence of really anything you wish. You can even deny that you are conversing with me. It's all good. I'll give you all the leeway you need to do what you've got to do.

, which is why this conversation has to stop right here
No, that's not how it works. By the way, would you care to guess how you just gave away that you are (far) leftist?

until you provide evidence that such an entity exists.
Nope. You mean to say until you decide to stop actively denying the existence of the LGBTQQIAXXXXXXX+ movement. OK. When you decide to stop denying its existence, I will still be here happy to discuss how Russia is absolutely doing the right thing by outlawing the movement's supremacy, public indecency, and harming of society.
 
The issue here isn't who determines membership.
Correct. The issue is the harm the movement causes society.

The issue here is that you've provided no evidence that such an entity exists in the first place.
I have provided evidence, but I really don't need to first prove the existence of everything I wish to discuss with you.

Let's agree that I acknowledge the existence of the LGBTQQIAXXXXXXX+ movement and that you deny its existence. There. Done.

Question: why are you so against Russia outlawing a movement that you don't believe even exists? Why should you care if Russia were to outlaw purple, midget, hairburning Romulans who flunked math?

I see that you've now changed your acronym from "LGTBQIAXXX..." to "LGTBQQIAXXX...".
Apparently I was mistakenly referring to an obsolete initialism. It changed so frequently. In fact, it was the most frequently changing initialism that never existed. Quite the accomplishment.

I think it's pretty clear that you're just making up these acronyms as you go along.
You should be extending me credit for trying my best to keep up.

I saw your 11 minute video. It's long and has a lot of points. For now, I'll just point out that they made no mention of either your "LGTBQIAXXX..." or your "LGTBQQIAXXX...".
Consider it as a placeholder, just as you use "LGBT" for convenience and not because you are claiming to be the determinant of membership, and that you are cancelling the membership of all the "QQIAXXXXXXX+"
 
I don't know what a "faggot" is,
A faggot is bits and pieces of wood (usually twigs bound together), typically used as firewood. The term is also used in a derogatory way to describe homosexual behavior. It can also refer to a dish found in the UK (made of bits and pieces). The term first entered the English lexicon around 1200AD.
but I do know that only ignorant, uneducated, backwoods slugs use the term.
Nope. The term is used quite often, especially in the UK.
By the way, I'm not going anywhere, motherfucker. This is my country. I will be alive a lot longer than you will be, praise the gods.
So you would rather stay and suffer and quite possibly be arrested for lewd behavior in public.
 
I don't know what a "faggot" is, but I do know that only ignorant, uneducated, backwoods slugs use the term. By the way, I'm not going anywhere, motherfucker. This is my country. I will be alive a lot longer than you will be, praise the gods.
lol given the list of diseases you and your peers spread you're full of shit, of course.
 
You prehistoric assholes criminalized sodomy.
Did it ever occur to you that your operating definition of "sodomy" is not the same one used historically?

You said that marriage "rights" only belonged to straight couples.
Did it ever occur to you that your operating definition of "marriage" is not the same one being used by others?

Fuck you straight to hell
He can't very well go gay to hell.

, you bigoted, backwards dick hole.
Did it ever occur to you that you are a bigoted ... whatever words you wish to fill in here?
 
Question: why are you so against Russia outlawing a movement that you don't believe even exists? Why should you care if Russia were to outlaw purple, midget, hairburning Romulans who flunked math?
I'm assuming for the very same reason that the "Church of No God" crowd (aka the crowd that has hijacked the word 'athiest') gets their knickers in such a twist over the intercessory prayers of Christians.
 
They don't care if you pray.
The mayor of Minneapolis does. He says that children were literally praying when they got shot at school, so "thoughts and prayers" aren't good enough.

He doesn't want any "thoughts and prayers"; he just wants to grab as many guns from innocent gunowners as possible.
 
The mayor of Minneapolis does. He says that children were literally praying when they got shot at school, so "thoughts and prayers" aren't good enough.

He doesn't want any "thoughts and prayers"; he just wants to grab as many guns from innocent gunowners as possible.
He wants more than just prayers and thoughts. He wants action.

He doesn't want to grab as many guns as possible. That's a blatant lie.
 
He wants more than just prayers and thoughts. He wants action.

He doesn't want to grab as many guns as possible. That's a blatant lie.
What "action" does he want?

The removal of "gun free zone" signs?
Armed guards at schools?
Concealed carry at schools?
Metal detectors at schools?
Increased mental illness facilities and treatments?
Grabbing as many guns from innocent gunowners as possible?
 
What "action" does he want?

The removal of "gun free zone" signs?
Armed guards at schools?
Concealed carry at schools?
Metal detectors at schools?
Increased mental illness facilities and treatments?
Grabbing as many guns from innocent gunowners as possible?
Any action is a step towards solving the problem.

Addressing mental illnesses would be a good start.
 
Back
Top