Virginia Giuffre's tell all memoir to be published on Oct 21st, detailing her time with Epstein and his "many friends"

[鬼百合]

Trump is still a pedophile.

 

[鬼百合]

It's a smokescreen.

Dammo is waiting for me to use it against one of his minions so he can ban me again.

 

[鬼百合]

It's okay dammo nobody noticed your blatant hypocrisy.

 

[Walt]

This hoax "file" was around the entire Biden administration and no one said anything because they knew it was just a hoax.

The evidence was collected while trump was president, so if it was altered during or after collection, that is on trump. Oddly enough, the evidence was stored with Epstein's oldest friend. Barr may not be provably guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but he clearly has a conflict of interest.

The financial files have multiple copies in forms that are nearly impossible to change. The checksums were published at the time, so altered records would be obvious. So if the financial files were altered during the Biden Administration, that would be provable, and trump could prosecute based on that.

The files are clearly not a "hoax." They may not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that anyone else was criminally involved... But they are almost certainly going to suggest it.

Pam Bondi has already explained that the file is full of child porn that will not be released.

I have seen quite literally millions of financial records, of all types, and not one of them has contained any form of video. They sometimes contain pictures of documents, but I have never seen anything like child porn in them. Datebooks, phone logs, address books, business correspondence, business diary, etc. would usually not contain child porn. If they did, the child porn could easily be removed.

There are professionals who handle such things. It can be done by an uninvolved party.

We should not forget that trump stole from his "charity" to illegally give Bondi funds. She has a clear conflict of interest.

 

[Walt]

WOW 12B 6 times in one thread. Magats sure are assholes.

It just keeps happening, over and over again. It is sad.

Republicans cannot defend trump without claiming everyone who disagrees with trump on anything is "pure evil."

 

[鬼百合]

It just keeps happening, over and over again. It is sad.

Republicans cannot defend trump without claiming everyone who disagrees with trump on anything is "pure evil."

It's all good. I know the truth that's all that matters. Trump will die soon.

 

[Walt]

She was 16

Here is an interesting point: she says she remembers herself as being "15 or 16." People usually do not remember their exact age when things happen. Following her timeline, of getting the job as soon as she moved in with her father, that would be 14. We know she moved in with her father at age 14.

There is someone who would know her age, and that is trump. he should have her employment records which would have the exact date she was hired. If he does not have those records, and employed a minor, there is a criminal issue. As that minor was later sexually abused due to the job, if the job was illegal, that is a big criminal issue.

Marcinko apparently does not know the age she was when she was brought into the USA. Again, that is not surprising. Again, trump has those records. trump arranged for her work visa, which has specific dates on it, and so we will know when she entered the country.

It is funny how often "Epstein files" are really "trump files."

 

[Into the Night]

Epstein committed child rape, and human trafficking, among other crimes.

I'm not asking about Epstein, Wally. You already know that. Pivot fallacy.

trump was involved with the human trafficking, but his criminal involvement cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

What 'human trafficking', Wally?

trump is also accused of the child rape, by multiple witnesses, but again that probably cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

What child rape, Wally?

The crimes absolutely have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

What crimes, Wally?

Maxwell and Epstein were both convicted, beyond a reasonable doubt.

Pivot fallacy.

trump's criminal involvement has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

What crime, Wally?

So asking what crime is kind of stupid.

No, your wild claims are VERY stupid.

 

[Into the Night]

Giuffres was employed by trump when she met Maxwell. Marcinko was brought into the USA under a fake work visa with trump's semi-fake modeling agency. Instead of modeling, she became a sex slave of Epstein. trump helped Epstein setup the financing for his island.

Proof?

trump clearly was involved.

Proof?

The question is whether he was criminally involved beyond a reasonable doubt?

What crime, Wally?

Even trump seems to think he had something to do with Epstein, "I’ve known Jeff [Epstein] for 15 years.

So? That's not a crime, Wally.

Terrific guy, He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." They flew together on each others' planes. trump complains that Epstein "stole" underage girls from him, but trump never reported that to the police. Even the banning from mar-a-lardo, proves there was a time before the banning, and were in each others' lives.

Random phrases ignored.

There are video hanging out.

Video does not 'hang' anywhere, Wally.

Clearly they were involved with each other.

So?

Now there is no evidence Epstein had anything to do with Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Bush, etc.

Yes there is.

But he definitely had a lot to do with trump.

So?

What is the crime, Wally?

 

[Into the Night]

Sure is interesting now we can claim someone wants child porn and nothing is done.

Something was done. You were banned for a week.

 

[Into the Night]

It's all good. I know the truth that's all that matters. Trump will die soon.

Are you planning another assassination attempt, Sybil?

 

[Walt]

Nope. The "Epstein File" is just a hoax that happens to contain hundreds of child porn videos that Democrats insist be released to the public.

In most financial records, there is no place to put a video. With the paper files, there is no way to put a video on paper. There are going to be things on the computer, and in the other records that are not videos.

Obviously, the child porn videos should not be released to the public, but they need to be reviewed by someone who does not have an extreme conflict of interest. Bondi should not be the only person to review them.

Epstein seems like the type who would have a lot of child porn videos, but someone (without a conflict of interest) has to review them to make sure they are not evidence of a crime beyond their simple possession.

 

[Into the Night]

Trump is still a pedophile.

Trump was never convicted of pedophelia.

 

[Into the Night]

Dammo is waiting for me to use it against one of his minions so he can ban me again.

Use what, Sybil?

 

[Into the Night]

It's okay dammo nobody noticed your blatant hypocrisy.

What 'hypocrisy'?? You were banned for a 12b.

 

[AProudLefty]

Proof?

Proof?

What crime, Wally?

So? That's not a crime, Wally.

Random phrases ignored.


Video does not 'hang' anywhere, Wally.

So?

Yes there is.

So?

What is the crime, Wally?

Random post. No apparent coherency.

 

[Into the Night]

The evidence was collected while trump was president, so if it was altered during or after collection, that is on trump. Oddly enough, the evidence was stored with Epstein's oldest friend. Barr may not be provably guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but he clearly has a conflict of interest.

The financial files have multiple copies in forms that are nearly impossible to change. The checksums were published at the time, so altered records would be obvious. So if the financial files were altered during the Biden Administration, that would be provable, and trump could prosecute based on that.

The files are clearly not a "hoax." They may not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that anyone else was criminally involved... But they are almost certainly going to suggest it.


I have seen quite literally millions of financial records, of all types, and not one of them has contained any form of video. They sometimes contain pictures of documents, but I have never seen anything like child porn in them. Datebooks, phone logs, address books, business correspondence, business diary, etc. would usually not contain child porn. If they did, the child porn could easily be removed.

There are professionals who handle such things. It can be done by an uninvolved party.

We should not forget that trump stole from his "charity" to illegally give Bondi funds. She has a clear conflict of interest.

What 'files', Wally?

 

[AProudLefty]

What 'hypocrisy'?? You were banned for a 12b.

The hypocrisy is your sock @IBDaMann not being banned.

 

[AProudLefty]

What 'files', Wally?

Ask Pam Bondi and Libsoftiktok.

 

[Walt]

It's all good. I know the truth that's all that matters. Trump will die soon.

It is the one thing he cannot lie himself out of.