Republican drugged granddaughters’ ice cream with cocaine and MDMA

TOP said:
Your post is an obvious, multiple violation...just saying...
Click to expand...
This does not even seem to be about child sexual abuse, so how can this be a violation of 12b. I guess you can say @Earl making this about child sexual abuse would be a violation of 12b by Earl, but again, why is that anything about me.

This is definitely child abuse. Many times child abuse is about sexual child abuse, so I certainly want it investigated heavily for sexual abuse. But, there is no reason to believe it is about sexual abuse.

And even less that it has anything to do with Finland, or immigration. It seems to be a southern man(if it were Florida I would say "Florida Man") committing really weird crimes, because he thinks as a white man he can get away with anything.
 
Earl said:
Indeed and not his first.
Click to expand...
He
Walt said:
This does not even seem to be about child sexual abuse, so how can this be a violation of 12b. I guess you can say @Earl making this about child sexual abuse would be a violation of 12b by Earl, but again, why is that anything about me.

This is definitely child abuse. Many times child abuse is about sexual child abuse, so I certainly want it investigated heavily for sexual abuse. But, there is no reason to believe it is about sexual abuse.

And even less that it has anything to do with Finland, or immigration. It seems to be a southern man(if it were Florida I would say "Florida Man") committing really weird crimes, because he thinks as a white man he can get away with anything.
Click to expand...
Simply read what you wrote and then review the twelve b rule
 
Damocles said:
It is an option different from banning everyone. Or, in DU's "great wisdom" do you think that everyone banned will fix it more?
Click to expand...
banning would silence everyone. Mutual ignore for all those who disagree with each other will provide more peace. As it is, and as you can verify, I have all the pedophile-supporting traitorous MAGAts on ignore and it's really cut down on my conflicts, time on JPP and having to scroll through their stupid shit.

Thanks for all the mutual ignores! :thup:
 
Walt said:
As @Damocles has explained to me multiple times to me, accusing someone of defending child molesting is not a violation of 12b. Hey, you can even accuse me of being a coconspirator after the fact, according to Damocles.
Click to expand...
Um. No. I explained to you that you need to make it about someone off the site. Disagreeing about the content of videos that have not been released is not a violation, but saying "you need" or "you support" then a simple activity is still accusing them of the activity.

Basically, make it about people that they vote for, and you'll be following the rule. Make it about who you think they "imagine" stuff about, not so much.
Walt said:
If you want to be a whiny Nazi Bitch about it, go ahead.

By the way, what you are defending is not definitely child sexual abuse. It might be nonsexual child abuse. There is no evidence that it is sexual at all. So not covered at all under 12b.
Click to expand...
Anyway. I do think it likely you will spend some time away from the board, because you cannot let it go. When you are wrong you insist on doing it all the way, right down to the bone, without reservation, totally wrong... you cannot resist.
 
TOP said:
Simply read what you wrote and then review the twelve b rule
Click to expand...
12b only mentions sex with minors. My only point is that someone who abuses a child should also be investigated for the possibility there was also sexual abuse. That is not unreasonable.

There is no reason to believe that this case has anything to do with sexual abuse. @Earl 's dragging of sexual abuse into this case is on him, not me.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
banning would silence everyone. Mutual ignore for all those who disagree with each other will provide more peace. As it is, and as you can verify, I have all the pedophile-supporting traitorous MAGAts on ignore and it's really cut down on my conflicts, time on JPP and having to scroll through their stupid shit.

Thanks for all the mutual ignores! :thup:
Click to expand...
If you think that this is about disagreement then you are the simplest of morons who cannot maintain a memory.
 
Damocles said:
Anyway. I do think it likely you will spend some time away from the board, because you cannot let it go. When you are wrong you insist on doing it all the way, right down to the bone, without reservation, totally wrong... you cannot resist.
Click to expand...
I can only see @Walt's side of the conversation. Why would he be banned for claiming someone defends nonsexual child abuse? A new rule for Lefties?
 
Walt said:
12b only mentions sex with minors. My only point is that someone who abuses a child should also be investigated for the possibility there was also sexual abuse. That is not unreasonable.

There is no reason to believe that this case has anything to do with sexual abuse. @Earl 's dragging of sexual abuse into this case is on him, not me.
Click to expand...
Read what you wrote and review the rule...
 
Damocles said:
Um. No. I explained to you that you need to make it about someone off the site. Disagreeing about the content of videos that have not been released is not a violation, but saying "you need" or "you support" then a simple activity is still accusing them of the activity.

Basically, make it about people that they vote for, and you'll be following the rule. Make it about who you think they "imagine" stuff about, not so much.

Anyway. I do think it likely you will spend some time away from the board, because you cannot let it go. When you are wrong you insist on doing it all the way, right down to the bone, without reservation, totally wrong... you cannot resist.
Click to expand...
It was not a violation for someone to say I wanted child porn to be released and that I was a sick-o and then they repeated this atleast 10 times. You did nothing. At least be consistent and fair when moderating. Either it is a rule applied to everyone in the same manner or it is not.
 
Walt said:
12b only mentions sex with minors. My only point is that someone who abuses a child should also be investigated for the possibility there was also sexual abuse. That is not unreasonable.

There is no reason to believe that this case has anything to do with sexual abuse. @Earl 's dragging of sexual abuse into this case is on him, not me.
Click to expand...
As you mention, there are several forms of child abuse. Sexual is only among the worst. There's physical abuse, verbal abuse, neglect, isolation, starvation, etc.

MAGAts would support them all if their Orange Jesus and his apostle, RFK jr., told them to do so.

a4ondw.jpg
 
鬼百合 said:
It was not a violation for someone to say I wanted child porn to be released and that I was a sick-o and then they repeated this atleast 10 times. You did nothing. At least be consistent and fair when moderating. Either it is a rule applied to everyone in the same manner or it is not.
Click to expand...
I warned them.... You too do not seem to have a memory. When they said "you need" the release of porn, they violated the rule, then they said "you are demanding the release"... they are not. One is a disagreement between you two as to what may be on the video you want released, the other is a statement about you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top