They would rather that other people die....

But what failed the MOST was the campaign to elect the used up old Ho. Really you guys? I mean,..really? You pinned your last and final hopes on an OBVIOUS used up old Ho? :ROFLMAO: How stupid can you be. Yep.........you fully deserve what is coming your way. The midterms will finish you off.
You hope.
 
Ok, I'm waiting for your first "truth" :) Everything you post is hate-filled horseshit. live for the truth. The truth doesn't annoy, me. Just you.

Keep babbling the same old bullshit 'hate' dumbassery, gimp; it's hilarious how you drones can only parrot the same idiot crap over and over, long after you sociopaths and psychopaths have gone over the cliff into Freddy Kruegger Land.
 
But what failed the MOST was the campaign to elect the used up old Ho. Really you guys? I mean,..really? You pinned your last and final hopes on an OBVIOUS used up old Ho? :ROFLMAO: How stupid can you be. Yep.........you fully deserve what is coming your way. The midterms will finish you off.

Yep. Their approval ratings are down to around 10% and falling. A few more of their tranny psychos shooting up schools and they're toast.
 
The poster doesn’t have a point other than like all good MAGA he hates America’s leading cities even though he has probably never been to any of them
"Leading cities"? What are they "leading" in besides crime?
So States don’t count? Rural crime doesn’t count?
Not when the discussion is about cities. When it's about cities, then you need to stay focused on the cities themselves and not try to "full a fast one" and start using the word 'states' while pretending that you're still talking about cities.
Not a switch,
It was a switch.
the reality, most Red States are more dangerous than their Blue counterparts.
There you go again... You're back to using the word 'states' ... States are NOT cities, anchovies. And now you're also adding in a second "switch-a-roo", now using the term 'more dangerous' (an ambiguously generic term) instead of remaining focused on the term 'homicides'.

Stick with the discussion at hand (homicides in major cities that have all had Democrat mayors --and have otherwise been controlled by Democrats-- dating back decades upon decades upon decades). Any inclusion of the words 'state' and 'more dangerous' is a purposeful diversion away from the discussion at hand that you don't like because it implicates Democrats.
Alaska, a red State, is rural and has one of the highest crime rates in the country
Alaska is a state, not a major city. States are not cities. Stay focused, anchovies.
Because they are the largest of largest, metro Chicago has more people than the seven least populated States in America and a greater population density than Houston, Dallas and San Antonio combined
Chicago is one of the major cities with high homicide rates. Chicago has been controlled by Democrats since forever. Thanks for a relevant example. Want to look at any other major cities and see which political party has been controlling them for eons upon eons and how high their homicide rates are?

By the way, DC crime has been WAYYYYY down lately. So, what recently changed there? Care to take a guess?
 
Back
Top