A much more accurate poll.

Im just pointing out that the people dont blame Obama for every action of the Federal Government. The leader is not always to blame for the failure of an orginization.
 
LOL just came across this image and it made me laugh so hard I to share it with you guys

23317306-23317312-slarge.jpg

from here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4354851
 
Jarod said:
THat was a self reporting poll, very un sceintific, you really dont know much about statistics do you?
Click to expand...

yeah, it was skewed....because the one million people that went to the CNN website to vote all had it in for Obama because he was a liberal....../chuckle.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
yeah, it was skewed....because the one million people that went to the CNN website to vote all had it in for Obama because he was a liberal....../chuckle.....
Click to expand...

The poll was not about Obama. But, it is obvious that it is not a scientific poll. If those things were accurate Ron Paul would have been the GOP nominee, instead of being mostly irrelevant.
 
Here's where I think he got the poll

http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1110a1 Oil Spill.pdf

However the results he posted were not for what he says they were for.

The only poll with those results was this one:

"Does the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico make you less likely to support drilling for new oil supplies in currently protected areas off shore or not?"

5/19-24/10 Less Likely -44% * NOT Less Likely - 49% * Unsure - 7%
Click to expand...

Here are the results of the Gallup Poll:

"How would you rate the federal government's overall response to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico: excellent, good, not so good or poor?" (Half sample)

6/3-6/10 Excellent - 2% * Good - 26% * Not so good - 37% * Poor - 32% * Unsure - 3%
Click to expand...
 
RStringfield said:
Take a class in statistics. Anybody that knows the first thing about it knows that sample size is not nearly as important as how the sample is selected. The MSNBC poll is worthless.
Click to expand...

Maybe Liberal polls, where they make sure the majority of those questioned are on the left; but the MSNBC poll is open to all.
 
Jarod said:
Im just pointing out that the people dont blame Obama for every action of the Federal Government. The leader is not always to blame for the failure of an orginization.
Click to expand...

According to the Liberal retards, when President Bush was in office, the leader is always to blame. :good4u:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Maybe Liberal polls, where they make sure the majority of those questioned are on the left; but the MSNBC poll is open to all.
Click to expand...


Are you just being silly or are you really ignorant enough to continue arguing this point? The poll is open just as it was when I am sure Ron Paul won it or many just like it. That's the problem. Like I said, take a class in statistics.

The MSNBC poll is not of much value. I would not be surprised that more people support the law than oppose it but support is not anywhere near that high. If that question were asked in a legitimate poll I doubt support would even gain a majority as many would answer as unsure.
 
RStringfield said:
Are you just being silly or are you really ignorant enough to continue arguing this point? The poll is open just as it was when I am sure Ron Paul won it or many just like it. That's the problem. Like I said, take a class in statistics.

The MSNBC poll is not of much value. I would not be surprised that more people support the law than oppose it but support is not anywhere near that high. If that question were asked in a legitimate poll I doubt support would even gain a majority as many would answer as unsure.
Click to expand...

But to the libtard left, a "legitimate poll" is one where the results work out in the libtard left's favor.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But to the libtard left, a "legitimate poll" is one where the results work out in the libtard left's favor.
Click to expand...

If these libtards posted a web poll and told me it proved a damn thing then I would call them on it. I don't care what the poll says. I liked Ron Paul and wanted him to win. I did not think the web polls were representative of voters. Web polls are influenced to strongly in favor of people who care strongly one way or the other as they will encourage their associates to vote. If they are of any value at all it might be in telling you where the passion is. But they are so unscientific I am skeptical of their reliability even for that.
 
RStringfield said:
If these libtards posted a web poll and told me it proved a damn thing then I would call them on it. I don't care what the poll says. I liked Ron Paul and wanted him to win. I did not think the web polls were representative of voters. Web polls are influenced to strongly in favor of people who care strongly one way or the other as they will encourage their associates to vote. If they are of any value at all it might be in telling you where the passion is. But they are so unscientific I am skeptical of their reliability even for that.
Click to expand...

Then why aren't more of those who voted no, encouraging their associates to vote??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top