Epstein estate turns over ‘birthday book,’ other documents to House panel

I saw nothing about Rathergate but do remember the controversy over documents and GW's sketchy ANG service.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_military_service_controversy

If you don't like my posts, feel free to ban me, put me on ignore or scroll over them. :)
That above picture of Epstein holding the check from Trump and Trump saying it is payment for a "fully depreciate (womans name redacted)" is the first time i am leaning more towards your view, Dutch, that Trump was doing improper things with Epstein girls and then paying Epstein for it.

THis is the closest to smoking gun proof we have seen.
 
When it comes to posting absolute stupidity, you've got no equal.
Ahhh, it really hurts coming from one of the finalists in the dumbest libtard on the forum award. I doubt you'll win, you're actually too much of a loser to win a stupidity contest, lol. Hey, maybe you'll be the runner-up. (That means you might get 2nd place)
 
That above picture of Epstein holding the check from Trump and Trump saying it is payment for a "fully depreciate (womans name redacted)" is the first time i am leaning more towards your view, Dutch, that Trump was doing improper things with Epstein girls and then paying Epstein for it.

THis is the closest to smoking gun proof we have seen.
They obviously had a very close relationship. Since Trump is a money-worshiper, I suspect he was in business with Epstein somehow. My theory is that he was laundering money for Epstein through Trump casinos. Raping the girls was just a side benefit.
 
I'm glad that you like what I posted.
Absolutely, I always appreciate hard work, and I can tell you really struggle with words, especially stringing more than two together. You managed a whole sentence twice in a row, that's real commitment from a simpleton. Again, good job, still lots of room for improvement so keep at it.
 
It was the MAGA-verse that hyped this for years. Now, they're all "nothing to see here."

Still waiting for some reason why this would have been forged over a decade before Trump entered politics.
 
They obviously had a very close relationship. Since Trump is a money-worshiper, I suspect he was in business with Epstein somehow. My theory is that he was laundering money for Epstein through Trump casinos. Raping the girls was just a side benefit.

Competing pimps are never in business together.

The frenemy of my frenemy is my frenemy.
 
Samples of Trump signature collected from public doc's around the time 30 years ago when the top signature was put on that Epstein drawing that @Damocles believes was planted 30 years ago to catch Trump now.



a5m3de.jpg
 
Samples of Trump signature collected from public doc's around the time 30 years ago when the top signature was put on that Epstein drawing that @Damocles believes was planted 30 years ago to catch Trump now.



a5m3de.jpg
Screenshot_20250909-185553.png

Just look at the shit these faggots try and pull off
 
Explain in your best poorly educated way what you think your post means?

I have already made it known, many times, that i do not think there is anything that would criminally incrementing in the Epstein files that would threaten Trump and instead it is just stuff that would feed the conspiracy theorists people.

THat is exactly what this birth card is. Something filled with the type of suggestive stuff that will feed the CTers forever.
I wouldn't need to explain if you had even a small amount of comprehension. IT is what you leftists have been looking for. For years...

So have I.

Huh?
 
I wouldn't need to explain if you had even a small amount of comprehension. IT is what you leftists have been looking for. For years...

So have I.

Huh?
So in a case like this where i think there is probably nothing incrementing about Trump in these files other than suggestive CT like stuff, your IT is to ask me if my guess is correct that it is mostly a nothing burger?

Do you understand how stupid your IT is, applied to this? Or are you too poorly educated to get that asking that of someone who thinks this instance is mostly a CT nothing burger is dumb?
 
So in a case like this where i think there is probably nothing incrementing about Trump in these files other than suggestive CT like stuff, your IT is to ask me if my guess is correct that it is mostly a nothing burger?

Do you understand how stupid your IT is, applied to this? Or are you too poorly educated to get that asking that of someone who thinks this instance is mostly a CT nothing burger is dumb?

Nope. You are shooting at the stars. Like I said, I shouldn't have to explain it to you. You should know what IT is.

Stupid? How many times have the leftists said this it IT? What's going to get Trump removed from office? The "Russian Collusion" was supposed to get Trump, only to come out as a bunch of lies. Then there's this lying gold digging whore who doesn't even know what year her accusation happened. Two impeachments was supposed to keep Trump from running again. Now, it's this fake birthday card... IT goes on and on and on.
 
Nope. You are shooting at the stars. Like I said, I shouldn't have to explain it to you. You should know what IT is.

Stupid? How many times have the leftists said this it IT? What's going to get Trump removed from office? The "Russian Collusion" was supposed to get Trump, only to come out as a bunch of lies. Then there's this lying gold digging whore who doesn't even know what year her accusation happened. Two impeachments was supposed to keep Trump from running again. Now, it's this fake birthday card... IT goes on and on and on.
Yes you are stupid because when a leftist says or thinks 'this is it' those are instances when they think Trump is caught doing something wrong and is punished.

So you saying 'is this it' to someone who is telling you he does not think Trump did something wrong makes zero sense. But the poorly educated never make sense, do they?
 
Yes you are stupid because when a leftist says or thinks 'this is it' those are instances when they think Trump is caught doing something wrong and is punished.

So you saying 'is this it' to someone who is telling you he does not think Trump did something wrong makes zero sense. But the poorly educated never make sense, do they?
This was a quote from an earlier post of yours (I won't correct the poor English): "The signature also seems to be undeniable his even though that is irrelevant to the lawsuit."

It was after I asked this question if this was IT. A simple answer of yes or no would have sufficed, but you changed your position and blamed me for not noticing, but I did.
No, you poorly educated twits never do make any sense.
 
Back
Top