Selective outrage is hypocrisy.

So you condone his assassination?
No.

But i think Charlie would support us all chipping in to bail out his killer, once he is caught.

images
 
When Kirk said "stoning gay people" he was quoting a bible verse in response to Ms. Rachel quoting a different one, he was mocking Ms. Rachel for selective cherry picking of bible verses, not promoting actual death penalties for gay people, let alone by stoning.

  • Posthumous clarification by Stephen King: After Kirk's assassination in September 2025, author Stephen King mistakenly claimed on X that Kirk had advocated for stoning gay people. King later retracted this, clarifying that Kirk had not advocated for the practice but had used the passage to criticize others' interpretations of the Bible.
what about when he was celebrating the guy who hit Paul Pelosi in the head with a hammer for doing extreme violence to an 80+ year old man?
 
what about when he was celebrating the guy who hit Paul Pelosi in the head with a hammer for doing extreme violence to an 80+ year old man?
Do you have video of that? I'd like to see what was said, in context. You are the first person that has said anything about this, and due to it being you holds no real value for me. I'm surprised I'm responding to this one... but it is at least something new that someone is saying about Kirk. Link us up, put it in context, I'll provide an opinion.
 
It is just a snapshot of his hateful stances. I do not know if he really felt that way or found it as an avenue to wealth and importance. He was a hater and encouraged others to hate.

Fuck off, gimp. You support a Party that advocates arson, assassination, sexually mutilating children, letting faggots adopt little boys, burning down police stations and Federal buildings, fake show trials a la Soviet and Red Chinese tactics, and much more. You're just vermin.
He was very judgmental and led the way for haters to be more so. A truly religious person would not hate gays and trans who are trying to find their way in a world tht haters are teaching to be more judgmental and proud of their hate.

lol all kinds of projection here, for sure.

They act as god made them. Who would choose to be gay or in the wrong sex, in a world that would torture them?

Mentally ill fetishists, that's who, moron.
 
Do you have video of that? I'd like to see what was said, in context. You are the first person that has said anything about this, and due to it being you holds no real value for me. I'm surprised I'm responding to this one... but it is at least something new that someone is saying about Kirk. Link us up, put it in context, I'll provide an opinion.
Kirk was bottom feeding scum. One of the worst of the worst when it came to trying incite non stop hate. Him dying does not mean we should not be honest about who he was.

 
Kirk was bottom feeding scum. One of the worst of the worst when it came to trying incite non stop hate. Him dying does not mean we should not be honest about who he was.

Yeah, bail him out and ask him some questions... seriously, you are trying desperately to find anything, and this is the best you got?

I knew I would regret responding to you, it never pays. Sometimes it seems like you have something interesting to talk about, but then you provide me with that. That isn't making fun of Paul, he isn't mocking anyone, he thinks someone should bail the guy out and ask him some questions. Even without context this just isn't as bad as you made it seem.
 
Very few, if any MAGA morons here on JPP ever mentioned how tragic this is for his children, which was practically the first thing I thought of.

The MAGA puppets have been almost exclusively focused on how to mold this into a political advantage
They're looking for an excuse to use violence to get their way.
 
There is a tremendous lack of self-awareness on the part of MAGA now.

I just heard a podcaster say that the only hateful rhetoric comes from liberals. That it's only the liberals who try to portray their opponents as a threat to the country. And he added that when anyone on the right commits a crime, conservatives ALWAYS condemn it and make sure that person is brought to justice & locked up - conveniently forgetting the J6 pardons.

I feel like I'm losing my mind hearing some of this absurdity from the right. They can't see themselves.
Yeah, also, you notice how the National Guard isn't in Orem Utah right now? Remember when that DOGE douche was beat up by girls in DC and trump went immediately to "defcon 1"? There is some mad hypocrisy right here, because Utah is a red state and Orem is a red city.

Fuck the MAGA's.
 
Okay. How was she "mocked, ridiculed, and dismissed?" Seems to me she's a minor political figure in Minnesota state politics with no national standing.
Funny how trump didn't declare their muder a "problem with the right", like he said Kirk's murder was by "radical leftists". Our own president is inciting violence. How proud you must be!
Yes, there are lunatics on both sides of politics, and her murder was another tragedy. I don't see a direct comparison in terms of political impact however.
You don't? You don't think Pelosi's attempted murder twice merits any attention from you? Color me not surprised at all.
 
When Kirk said "stoning gay people" he was quoting a bible verse in response to Ms. Rachel quoting a different one, he was mocking Ms. Rachel for selective cherry picking of bible verses, not promoting actual death penalties for gay people, let alone by stoning.

  • Posthumous clarification by Stephen King: After Kirk's assassination in September 2025, author Stephen King mistakenly claimed on X that Kirk had advocated for stoning gay people. King later retracted this, clarifying that Kirk had not advocated for the practice but had used the passage to criticize others' interpretations of the Bible.
Justify his words against Black women!
 
Justify his words against Black women!
Which are those? And I don't justify, I point out what he actually said. There is a difference between these things.

You could watch the videos of these things and listen to what he says rather than assume what you read in some leftist echo chamber is factual. So far, they do not have an impressive track record.
 
Yeah, bail him out and ask him some questions... seriously, you are trying desperately to find anything, and this is the best you got?

I knew I would regret responding to you, it never pays. Sometimes it seems like you have something interesting to talk about, but then you provide me with that. That isn't making fun of Paul, he isn't mocking anyone, he thinks someone should bail the guy out and ask him some questions. Even without context this just isn't as bad as you made it seem.
just as i knew you would be in denial of what a scum bag he was and what he would say.

Why do you have to bail out someone who is clearly a mentally ill person who just attacked one 80+ year old and says he wants to attack another.

Damocles you are nothing if not predictable and obvious. You cannot see Magat offenses but call out much lesser ones from Dem all the time.

That you can bet on and you will never lose that bet.
 
Paul or Nancy?
Both. The trumptard who broke into Pelosi's home intended to murder Nancy - Paul just happened to be home. The second time was when the trumptard rioters were hunting her in the Capitol.

Crime only matters to trumptards if others do it. Trumptards actually think they have the right to use violence to get their way!

1757724106636.png
 
Back
Top