Florida plans to become first state to eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates

That's what I've been trying to do with the definition of contract killings, but apparently you refuse to accept any definition from Wikipedia. Why?
Wikipedia is a non-authoritative source whose flagrant Marxist disinformation is locked down so that contributors cannot correct it to keep Wikipedia in line with its own stated standards.
 
I agree with your description, but that is not the definition. The definitions of interest are as follows:

[Subset] A ⊆ B ⇔ ∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B)
[Proper Subset] A ⊂ B ⇔ (∀x (x ∈ A → x ∈ B)) ∧ (∃y (y ∈ B ∧ y ∉ A))
[Union] A ∪ B = { ∀x | x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B}
[Intersection] A ∩ B = { ∀x | x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B}

Notice that for a standard mathemetics definition, I don't have to ask you if you agree to it. If you don't accept it, you have to explain why not.
Copying and pasting doesn't make you look smarter.
 
That's what I've been trying to do with the definition of contract killings, but apparently you refuse to accept any definition from Wikipedia. Why?
I gave you a clear, standard, detailed, unambiguous definition. You are currently stalling for time. You don't want to accept my totally straightforward definition because you know full well that your position on killing-supremacy, or "abortion", is indefensible and you have no idea how you are going to get out of this one. So your plan is obviously to quibble over the definition.

Regardless, [Abortion] is a proper subset of [Contract Killing] which is a subset of [Killing Living Humans]. You cannot defend your position without wandering into supremacy arguments.
 
I'm not sure I've ever used the term "scientific study" in this thread or any other.
What I do instead is trust articles, scientific studies and papers whose findings fit what I've already come to believe is true.

Also, there is no such thing as "scientific" research or "scientific" journals. There are only research and journals.

As director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Dr. Anthony Fauci dispenses $6.1 billion in annual taxpayer-provided funding for rigged scientific research, allowing him to dictate the subject, content, and outcome of scientific health research across the globe—truly a dark agenda.

The Real Anthony Fauci details how Fauci, Gates, and their cohorts use their control of media outlets—both conservative and liberal leaning, scientific journals, key government and quasi-governmental agencies, global intelligence agencies, and influential scientists and physicians to flood the public with fearful propaganda about COVID-19 virulence and pathogenesis, and to muzzle debate and ruthlessly censor dissent.[/B]
 
Back
Top