Selective outrage is hypocrisy.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Margot
Verified User
No it's racistIt's not racist if it's true and accurate, which it is.
Atlanta
San Francisco
Chicago
Washington DC
New Orleans
Charlotte NC
Baton Rouge
Every one of those has serious problems with crime, homelessness, unemployment, urban decay, and their finances. So, the appellation is true and accurate. I can easily toss more examples in.
How about this one?
Dubbed the "Worst mayor in America."
Or, maybe this one...
Her husband was the biggest criminal drug dealer in the city and she claims she didn't know it.
Former Rochester mayor's estranged husband pleads guilty to drug conspiracy
Timothy Granison, the estranged husband to former Rochester Mayor Lovely Warren pleaded guilty Monday in federal court to conspiracy of intending to distribute 500 grams of cocaine. Granison,43, was one of seven arrested in May of 2021 after a 7-month-long narcotics wiretap investigation by the...13wham.com
Want me to keep going? True and accurate isn't fucking racist! It's true and accurate.
To the surprise of absolutely nobody!
QP!
Verified User
I don't condone any killings.
But i do want to honor Charlie Kirk by supporting what he believed in a full throated way.
Charlie Kirk was clear that he believed it was ok and just a price society must pay that innocent people would get shot to maintain the US extreme open access gun laws.
You cannot say and believe that and not include yourself in the list of people you believe it is ok to get shot. If you do not include yourself then you would be reprehensible as you would be saying it is 'ok for other but not me'.
Do you think Charlie Kirk was reprehensible RB, or do you agree with him that it is was ok he got shot, as just a necessary cost to keep the guy laws absurdly open?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Bullshit! When you have an overwhelming number of cases of something that is consistent, it's a pattern and one you can't deny. Show me how any of those women, and I can provide more examples, weren't fuck ups in office or public life. Go for it! Show me where I'm wrong or explain why I'm being "racist."
Here's another. She let her city burn most recently.
Even she is a fuck up
Remember the ONE THING she did as First Lady? I do. That was the school lunch disaster she created all by herself.
michelle obama school lunch disaster - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.
Why Michelle Obama Is Wrong on School Lunches
Michelle Obama thinks she knows what your children should eat. She’s adamant about promoting her nutrition policies for kids, even the new and disastrous school meal standards implementing the “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.”
www.heritage.org
It is a demonstrable pattern. Black women put in positions of leadership are overwhelmingly fuck ups. It's that simple. There is nothing racist about it. There are women in general that perform quite well in positions of leadership from every other racial background and the failures are usually few. That isn't true for Black women alone. That is a pattern that cannot be denied based on factual evidence.
Last edited:
You of team evil have become scared that this hurt your chances of gaining power deeply,
You are frantically flinging shit in every direction in desperate hope that you can somehow recover.
You can't - this was an act that exposes your party - the party of Evil, so deeply that you simply will not recover,.
Margot
Verified User
Lame attempt to cover your disgusting racismBullshit! When you have an overwhelming number of cases of something that is consistent, it's a pattern and one you can't deny. Show me how any of those women, and I can provide more examples, weren't fuck ups in office or public life. Go for it! Show me where I'm wrong or explain why I'm being "racist."
Here's another. She let her city burn most recently.
Even she is a fuck up
Remember the ONE THING she did as First Lady? I do. That was the school lunch disaster she created all by herself.
michelle obama school lunch disaster - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.www.bing.com
Why Michelle Obama Is Wrong on School Lunches
Michelle Obama thinks she knows what your children should eat. She’s adamant about promoting her nutrition policies for kids, even the new and disastrous school meal standards implementing the “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.”
It is a demonstrable pattern. Black women put in positions of leadership are overwhelmingly fuck ups. It's that simple. There is nothing racist about it. There are women in general that perform quite well in positions of leadership from every other racial background and the failures are usually few. That isn't true for Black women alone. That is a pattern that cannot be denied based on factual evidence.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
So, you have nothing. All you can do is respond with an insult. How typical. No attempt to make a rebuttal, no attempt to counter anything I said, just sling an insult as if that mattered, because it doesn't. You have nothing useful to say on this and your point, by omission of anything resembling facts, is irrelevant.
Margot
Verified User
You're the one defending racism
TOP
Retired Teacher
90% of the "liberals" here do...
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
You are the one that can't prove your accusations. You might as well toss in "fascist" too. After all, that one is real popular with the Left today. Words have meaning and you use them without any.
Margot
Verified User
I'm not a leftist
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I don't care. You are certainly a poor debater in that you can't back up your argument with anything beyond vague generalities.
Margot
Verified User
This isn't a debate!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Yes, it is. That's what boards like this are about.
Look, I don't agree with everything that is said by everyone on the right. I don't always agree with Trump.
Why would you think I agree that it's a necessary price to pay that innocent people get shot?
Do you believe it was "necessary" that Kirk was killed to advance what you think should restrict
these "open access" gun laws? What should change? Who should no longer have those rights?
So what do you think is/are "open access" gun laws? Should I have to give up my rights when I pose no threat to anyone?
What do you think would be "reasonable" gun control laws? Who would you think should give up those rights? Everyone?
Maybe you can answer the question why so many of these assholes who shoot people are so young? What motivates them?
So many on the left think us old white guys are racist haters and pose the threat to society, yet it isn't us who start shooting
people.
No, I don't think Kirk was "reprehensible," nor do I think he deserved to be assassinated. Kirk said a lot of things, yet you
nit-pick only those things he said that referred to gun laws now that he was assassinated. Do you believe he deserved to be shot?