Charlie Kirk, hate speech is constitutionally protected!

Jarod said:
Not significantly sure to cause immediate violence!

So you support banning hate speech? Good to know.
Click to expand...
You can say whatever you want.... Just know that there are consequences if you are speaking while representing your employer... And they happen to have any standards at all.... You understand that I'm sure...
 
Lionfish said:
You don't know that.

Why were you not quacking like a duck when those on the right were removed from the air?

Are you too stupid to see the difference?
Click to expand...
Who on the right was threatened by the President of the United States?

I do not mind public outcry getting someone fired. I mind when someone threatens to use government power to punish private enterprise if they do not do what they want.
 
Nordberg said:
Because Kirk was a racist and a hater. But cheering was a bad move. I take no pleasure when haters get killed. I wish they could live long enough to see the errors of their philosophies. I want them to become better people.
Click to expand...
So an example IN FULL CONTEXT . Don't bother with trying to use highly edited snippets designed to misrepresent what he said. If you don't it is only because you are a dishonest hater that is spreading misinformation.
 
TOP said:
They shouldn't have to force an apology....He should be a decent person and do it...he lied...
Click to expand...

You truly are a stupid twat. Saying that the Reichwing's characterization of Kirk's accused murderer was wrong is not a lie. Go back on this very forum to last week before Robinson was apprehended. There are multiple posts from you fascist garbage calling the shooter a liberal, a trans person, etc. It turns out he was none of that. So where's the lie? And why are you so afraid to speak out and say, "No, @Jarod, I don't believe that the government should threaten the media if they don't do as it demands and fire a host for speaking his mind." I guess you passive-aggressive chickenshits really do not respect or honor the Constitution when it comes to punishing those you disagree with. I bet your dad, who you claimed fought in WWII, is rolling in his grave.
 
Jarod said:
Who on the right was threatened by the President of the United States?

I do not mind public outcry getting someone fired. I mind when someone threatens to use government power to punish private enterprise if they do not do what they want.
Click to expand...
Kimmel was trying to mobilize hate against MAGA by gaslighting his tiny audience. We just saw what that kind of hate can cause with unstable people. Private enterprise had enough of Kimmel's hate. He wasn't valuable enough for his bosses to keep him. In fact he was losing them money. If he was actually funny and had not actually alienated half of his audience maybe he would still be employed. But he wasn't funny and chose to give the finger to half of his audience. So he is gone. No big deal.
 
FastLane said:
Kimmel was trying to mobilize hate against MAGA by gaslighting his tiny audience. We just saw what that kind of hate can cause with unstable people. Private enterprise had enough of Kimmel's hate. He wasn't valuable enough for his bosses to keep him. In fact he was losing them money. If he was actually funny and had not actually alienated half of his audience maybe he would still be employed. But he wasn't funny and chose to give the finger to half of his audience. So he is gone. No big deal.
Click to expand...
One hundred percent correct...
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
You truly are a stupid twat. Saying that the Reichwing's characterization of Kirk's accused murderer was wrong is not a lie. Go back on this very forum to last week before Robinson was apprehended. There are multiple posts from you fascist garbage calling the shooter a liberal, a trans person, etc. It turns out he was none of that. So where's the lie? And why are you so afraid to speak out and say, "No, @Jarod, I don't believe that the government should threaten the media if they don't do as it demands and fire a host for speaking his mind." I guess you passive-aggressive chickenshits really do not respect or honor the Constitution when it comes to punishing those you disagree with. I bet your dad, who you claimed fought in WWII, is rolling in his grave.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure that Robinson is a LIBERAL :rofl2:
 
TOP said:
... I am .. I thought you men are an actual threat...
Click to expand...

Ah, so that's why you became a lesbian. Not that there's anything wrong with that. lol

Has your married bf H10 written any porno stories about you and him and a couple dogs and your gf yet? "Peanut Butter Party" would be a great title. :laugh:
 
FastLane said:
Kimmel was trying to mobilize hate against MAGA by gaslighting his tiny audience. We just saw what that kind of hate can cause with unstable people. Private enterprise had enough of Kimmel's hate. He wasn't valuable enough for his bosses to keep him. In fact he was losing them money. If he was actually funny and had not actually alienated half of his audience maybe he would still be employed. But he wasn't funny and chose to give the finger to half of his audience. So he is gone. No big deal.
Click to expand...
So without Trumps threats, you are saying he would have been fired anyway?

That is wildly untrue, you are delusional.
 
Lionfish said:
You don't know that.

Why were you not quacking like a duck when those on the right were removed from the air?

Are you too stupid to see the difference?
Click to expand...
Because there is no evidence it was done under pressure from the government. If it was, I would be against that.

If you had any integrity, you would be also.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top