As I said, Trump's lawsuit DISMISSED.

English please. And how so?
No need you know what I meant. How so? A ny judge decided what trumps property is worth. Even the state legislature temporarily rewrote laws to allow a gold digging whore to being a case against him for rape even though the dumbass broad couldnt remember what year this supposed rape took place.
 
Instead of legal complaint it was a long, long list of grievances. The judge chastised the lawyers who evidently framed it to please Trump's ego rather than lay out a cause of action. He gave them a little time to try better.
A complaint is a mechanism to fairly, precisely, directly, soberly, and economically inform the defendants — in a professionally constrained manner consistent with the dignity of the adversarial process in an Article III court of the United States — of the nature and content of the claims. A complaint is a short, plain, direct statement of allegations of fact sufficient to create a facially plausible claim for relief and sufficient to permit the formulation of an informed response. Although lawyers receive a modicum of expressive latitude in pleading the claim of a client, the complaint in this action extends far beyond the outer bound of that latitude. This complaint stands unmistakably and inexcusably athwart the requirements of Rule 8. This action will begin, will continue, and will end in accord with the rules of procedure and in a professional and dignified manner. The complaint is STRUCK with leave to amend within twenty-eight days. The amended complaint must not exceed forty pages, excluding only the caption, the signature, and any attachment. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on September 19, 2025. - From the order.

The order is very funny, read it here. . . https://storage.courtlistener.com/r...ts.flmd.447437.5.0.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
 
A complaint is a mechanism to fairly, precisely, directly, soberly, and economically inform the defendants — in a professionally constrained manner consistent with the dignity of the adversarial process in an Article III court of the United States — of the nature and content of the claims. A complaint is a short, plain, direct statement of allegations of fact sufficient to create a facially plausible claim for relief and sufficient to permit the formulation of an informed response. Although lawyers receive a modicum of expressive latitude in pleading the claim of a client, the complaint in this action extends far beyond the outer bound of that latitude. This complaint stands unmistakably and inexcusably athwart the requirements of Rule 8. This action will begin, will continue, and will end in accord with the rules of procedure and in a professional and dignified manner. The complaint is STRUCK with leave to amend within twenty-eight days. The amended complaint must not exceed forty pages, excluding only the caption, the signature, and any attachment. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on September 19, 2025. - From the order.

The order is very funny, read it here. . . https://storage.courtlistener.com/r...ts.flmd.447437.5.0.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
He reamed them!
 
Yeah, talking about the qualifications, or lack thereof, of someone holding office will never hold water in a libel lawsuit. However this wasn't thrown out on merit, only on the fact that the filing had "vituperation and invective"... So, because they used strong wording they need to refile without the invective...

What did they actually say?
 
You do realize that it wasn't tossed out, the judge just asked them to word it differently, right?

He did not ask them to do anything, he threw it out and allowed them 28 days to file a valid complaint, if they chose.

The Judge tossed the Complaint, there currently is no case because there is no Complaint pending, the judge gave them 28 days to file a proper complaint.

Maybe they should call me for help if they do not understand the Federal Rules of Court.
 
The Judge tossed the Complaint, there currently is no case because there is no Complaint pending, the judge gave them 28 days to file a proper complaint.

Maybe they should call me for help if they do not understand the Federal Rules of Court.
lol.

Long way to say, "You're right, he told them to refile it with less effluvium"... but I'll take it.
 
If they chose to do so.

He did not ask them to do it, or even order them to do it.

I read it.
*sigh*

Clearly so did I. This wasn't dismissed for merit, it was dismissed because it was verbose. Now if he had dismissed with prejudice for a standing issue or something you'd have something. However I read the thing.
 
Back
Top