Jimmy Kimmel is returning to TV

[ThatOwlWoman]

Says the very same people who gleefully labeled him "MAGA" when they thought they could gaslight us. Seriously, you have no moral high ground, you are swimming in the Mariana Trench.

As soon as I learned what type of weapon was used I thought "Hmm, must be a hunter. Hunters tend to be RW. Hunters also tend to be white males. He's in Utah so probably he's both RW and Mormon." Assumptions? You betcha. Pretty accurate, too. Where was the basis for you all to claim he was trans and antifa and liberal? The only one of those labels that makes any sense is the "liberal" or "LW," given his target.

 

[RB 60]

As soon as I learned what type of weapon was used I thought "Hmm, must be a hunter. Hunters tend to be RW. Hunters also tend to be white males. He's in Utah so probably he's both RW and Mormon." Assumptions? You betcha. Pretty accurate, too. Where was the basis for you all to claim he was trans and antifa and liberal? The only one of those labels that makes any sense is the "liberal" or "LW," given his target.

Who's rifle was it? Did he buy it himself? Or did he take it from someone else?

 

[Lionfish]

As soon as I learned what type of weapon was used I thought "Hmm, must be a hunter. Hunters tend to be RW. Hunters also tend to be white males. He's in Utah so probably he's both RW and Mormon." Assumptions? You betcha. Pretty accurate, too. Where was the basis for you all to claim he was trans and antifa and liberal? The only one of those labels that makes any sense is the "liberal" or "LW," given his target.

You are an idiot in denial.

 

[Lionfish]

Back to the topic.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[QP!]

I am not making anything up....

Kimmel said this crap on the 15th, reports about the texts began on the 12th, and they were read to us on the 16th.

The only people making crap up here is Kimmel, and you.

But you are making stuff up which is why you do not quote them and are misrepresenting beyond what they report and say.

Go ahead and try and make your arguments with direct quotes instead of just saying 'that is what they say'. We know you will not because you cannot.

Again Kimmel said there, EXACTLY what i was saying here. The right, from the minute Kirk was shot was out screaming 'it is democrats'...'it is leftists' IMMEDIATELY politicizing Kirks death with ZERO evidence. The ONLY message they cared to get out was 'it was NOT one of us... it was one of THEM.'

I am not some person of magic who was able to mystically understand that. I said it here as it was obvious and true.

 

[QP!]

Then it came out...he was a leftist.

Is it alright to shoot someone because you disagree with them?
Apparently, the coward thinks so...

It has STILL not come out he was a leftist.

What we know is he grew up in a Magat family and he looks to be a gay young man who was in a relationship with another gay man who may be transitioning to female.

Now to simple minded magats that means he must be leftist but that is simply not accurate as there are lots of gays who are republican.

But the best reports so far say he is like most young and simply not political at all. Probably has not devoted 2% of his thoughts to politics and him shooting at Kirk would be comparable to the Ukrainian shooting at Trump. Ukrainians and Russians in America are overwhelming Republican. As much so as inner city black women are Democrats. So when a Ukrainian man shoots at Trump it is most likely that he is NOT a leftist and saw Trump as someone who was a threat to his homeland, people and family.

This young gay man, also seems to be apolitical and seems to have shot Kirk because he thought Kirks hate was a threat to his partner and the community he was part of, gay and trans people.

 

[QP!]

We do know he is a leftist. Not "was", he's not the victim and he's still here.

We know this because of what his family and friends have told us. You need to stop pretending that things we know are somehow beyond our comprehension when they make you feel uncomfortable. If he was a right winger you'd all be dancing in the streets, when the leftists on this board thought he was a right winger because his dad is they were gleefully making threads about it, celebrating; you were one of them... literally doing what Kimmel said the MAGA was doing.

You are liar.

You need to stop misrepresenting what people have said.

 

[Lionfish]

It has STILL not come out he was a leftist.

What we know is he grew up in a Magat family and he looks to be a gay young man who was in a relationship with another gay man who may be transitioning to female.

Now to simple minded magats that means he must be leftist but that is simply not accurate as there are lots of gays who are republican.

But the best reports so far say he is like most young and simply not political at all. Probably has not devoted 2% of his thoughts to politics and him shooting at Kirk would be comparable to the Ukrainian shooting at Trump. Ukrainians and Russians in America are overwhelming Republican. As much so as inner city black women are Democrats. So when a Ukrainian man shoots at Trump it is most likely that he is NOT a leftist and saw Trump as someone who was a threat to his homeland, people and family.

This young gay man, also seems to be apolitical and seems to have shot Kirk because he thought Kirks hate was a threat to his partner and the community he was part of, gay and trans people.

QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee,
Cling to your denial. It befits you.

 

[QP!]

Says the very same people who gleefully labeled him "MAGA" when they thought they could gaslight us. Seriously, you have no moral high ground, you are swimming in the Mariana Trench.

Quote one of those "same people who gleefully labeled him Maga" prior please?

I suspect just more gaslighting and lying but go ahead and prove me wrong.

You are on a non stop lying and gaslighting binge while saying others are doing so but you can easily prove me wrong by quoting any of the things i am asking you for in the last few posts.

I bet you refuse to even try... and we know why... you cannot.

 

[QP!]

Ah, so because his family and some friends said so, it must be true.

He was raised by Trumppers. He was once a Trumpper, and there is suggestion he was a part of an anti-establishment group on the internet that did not accept the Left/Right paradigm.

I do not believe he was Left or Right. He wanted to blow up the system.

And understand Jarod, @Damocles is lying in his representations of what the family and others have said.

The statements i have seen have them only saying something like he was 'shifting more left', which if you grow up in a magat family and are a gay man, living a gay life, means you moved more left by default. Almost certainly you will have disagreements with your magat family over religious beliefs and old school republican beliefs about being gay in society.

That DOES not make you a leftist or a Dem as there are many gays, who fit that bill, who are very active Republicans, putting their cash behind republican causes (ie Peter Thiel) .

Magats here do not accept that two things can be true at the same time. A person can remain holding their republican/right identity while ALSO being gay and thus perceived by Magats, who are extreme right, as 'moving left'.

 

[RB 60]

It has STILL not come out he was a leftist.

What we know is he grew up in a Magat family and he looks to be a gay young man who was in a relationship with another gay man who may be transitioning to female.

Now to simple minded magats that means he must be leftist but that is simply not accurate as there are lots of gays who are republican.

But the best reports so far say he is like most young and simply not political at all. Probably has not devoted 2% of his thoughts to politics and him shooting at Kirk would be comparable to the Ukrainian shooting at Trump. Ukrainians and Russians in America are overwhelming Republican. As much so as inner city black women are Democrats. So when a Ukrainian man shoots at Trump it is most likely that he is NOT a leftist and saw Trump as someone who was a threat to his homeland, people and family.

This young gay man, also seems to be apolitical and seems to have shot Kirk because he thought Kirks hate was a threat to his partner and the community he was part of, gay and trans people.

He sure didn't like what kirk was saying enough to kill him Why didn't he shoot one of the left leaning speakers at that college? I'd be willing to bet there were a few of those who spoke there too. Isn't it true that some young break from their upbringing? I'll bet his parents didn't approve of their son shacking up with a trans.

It's the left who make a big deal of "trans rights." Own it, he was on your side.
The rest of your rant is meaningless. Smoke and mirrors.

 

[QP!]

Why can't people wait until the info comes out before they make connections?

Because that does not serve politics.

BOTH of the Trump shooters were labelled to instantly be part of the left, before a thing was known about that.

It was PROVED later neither could be shown to be of the left and best evidence showed them to be more likely right leaning, although the young man who shot at Trump on the stage, seems to be more apolitical, despite prior voting republican. But he had a list of 'big names' of both Dem and Magat politicians, waiting for any of them to come to a city near his home, so he could shoot them. He seems like the school shooter type who realized shooting kids in schools no longer gets a killer the infamy it did prior and wanted a bigger target.

 

[QP!]

I am speaking about Kimmel, and the day he made the comments. Which was after the guy was arrested, but before we had the text messages read to us on TV. Though several news agencies had reported the texts existed and referenced that his "roommate" was indeed his lover.

At that time we had information from the Governor of the State of Utah where he said the family stated he was left wing and had become more political in the past few months, and we had found out about his trans girlfriend that everyone on the left kept pretending was a "roommate" rather than his lover even though it had been reported that he texted his lover and that his lover was cooperating.

I am speaking about Kimmel, and what we knew when he said his nonsense and gaslit America on this program. At the time Kimmel gaslit America on this program we knew the young man was leftist, and that he was dating a trans woman.

That does not change what she is saying or what Kimmel said.

Kimmel was speaking to the reaction Magats had immediately after the shooting. he was saying all they cared about was saying 'its was not us... it was Dems... it was the left', with no information.

Even if new information follows later that DOES NOT change what the magat reaction was immediately after which Kimmel and i both called out.

 

[QP!]

He sure didn't like what kirk was saying enough to kill him Why didn't he shoot one of the left leaning speakers at that college? I'd be willing to bet there were a few of those who spoke there too. Isn't it true that some young break from their upbringing? I'll bet his parents didn't approve of their son shacking up with a trans.

It's the left who make a big deal of "trans rights." Own it, he was on your side.
The rest of your rant is meaningless. Smoke and mirrors.

RB i am truly trying to help you be smarter.

It is entirely possible that a Ukrainian man living in the US, could never vote Dem in his life and that is quite likely if you know any. It is also possible that Ukrainian man could try to kill Trump not because he is a lefty and because he thinks Trump is a threat to his homeland, and his family.

Can you accept that RB? Can you understand that? That the person can be 'of the right' but just see Trump as a threat to his family/community.

Similarly this young man could absolutely be of the right, or more likely not political, and yet see Kirk and his comments demonizing gays and trans people as a threat to him, his partner and the life he has chosen to live.

Can you accept that RB? That even a vocal gay person who is super political on the right (obviously not this kid), could see someone like Kirk as a threat to their gay/trans partner?

 

[RB 60]

RB i am truly trying to help you be smarter.

It is entirely possible that a Ukrainian man living in the US, could never vote Dem in his life and that is quite likely if you know any. It is also possible that Ukrainian man could try to kill Trump not because he is a lefty and because he thinks Trump is a threat to his homeland, and his family.

Can you accept that RB? Can you understand that? That the person can be 'of the right' but just see Trump as a threat to his family/community.

Similarly this young man could absolutely be of the right, or more likely not political, and yet see Kirk and his comments demonizing gays and trans people as a threat to him, his partner and the life he has chosen to live.

Can you accept that RB? That even a vocal gay person who is super political on the right (obviously not this kid), could see someone like Kirk as a threat to their gay/trans partner?

There's nothing you can teach me.

I accept the fact that what you are rambling about is irrelevant.

How could he be from the right if he hated Kirk and his message enough to kill him?
Lots more say worse than Kirk did to insult the gay community. Only a few of them kill.

No. I cannot accept that.

 

[Jarod]

Add Joe Rogan to the list of those condemning what Trump and the FCC commissioner tried to do. . .

“I definitely don’t think that the government should be involved, ever, in dictating what a comedian can or cannot say in a monologue,” - Joe Rogan, a little late to the conversation.

 

[Jarod]

“Frankly, when you see stuff like this — I mean, we can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Mr. Carr, who was appointed by Mr. Trump, said on a podcast. “These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action, frankly, on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the F.C.C. ahead.” - FCC Commissioner

 

[Lionfish]

“Frankly, when you see stuff like this — I mean, we can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Mr. Carr, who was appointed by Mr. Trump, said on a podcast. “These companies can find ways to change conduct and take action, frankly, on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the F.C.C. ahead.” - FCC Commissioner

Is Kimmel still on the air?
Yes
or
No

 

[Ross Dolan]

That does not change what she is saying or what Kimmel said.

Kimmel was speaking to the reaction Magats had immediately after the shooting. he was saying all they cared about was saying 'its was not us... it was Dems... it was the left', with no information.

Even if new information follows later that DOES NOT change what the magat reaction was immediately after which Kimmel and i both called out.

Correct, QP:

That does not change what she is saying or what Kimmel said.

Kimmel was speaking to the reaction Magats had immediately after the shooting. he was saying all they cared about was saying 'its was not us... it was Dems... it was the left', with no information.

Even if new information follows later that DOES NOT change what the magat reaction was immediately after which Kimmel and i both called out.

Just wanted to make sure these MAGA morons could see what you wrote.