Jimmy Kimmel is returning to TV

RB 60 said:
There's nothing you can teach me.

I accept the fact that what you are rambling about is irrelevant.

How could he be from the right if he hated Kirk and his message enough to kill him?
Lots more say worse than Kirk did to insult the gay community. Only a few of them kill.

No. I cannot accept that.
Click to expand...

This is the statement that shows how irredeemably stupid you truly are "...How could he be from the right if he hated Kirk and his message enough to kill him?..."

It is entirely possible for a log cabin republican who voted for Bush Sr, Bush Jr and Reagan, who was welcomed in to the party and who shared those espoused views of 'limited government, low debt and deficits' to also HATE the Magat take over of the party which now focuses on culture wars and the hate of trans and gay people and to see someone like Charlie kirk as a threat to them.


You are amongst the hate filled Magats RB so you think you are what the party always was but that is not true. While hate filled magats always existed they were not driving the party agenda based on culture war hate.


So to, if a single life long log cabin Republican still holds his very 'right' views but sees Kirk as a threat... you automatically say 'that then makes him a leftist' ... and it does not.
 
QP! said:
This is the statement that shows how irredeemably stupid you truly are "...How could he be from the right if he hated Kirk and his message enough to kill him?..."

It is entirely possible for a log cabin republican who voted for Bush Sr, Bush Jr and Reagan, who was welcomed in to the party and who shared those espoused views of 'limited government, low debt and deficits' to also HATE the Magat take over of the party which now focuses on culture wars and the hate of trans and gay people and to see someone like Charlie kirk as a threat to them.


You are amongst the hate filled Magats RB so you think you are what the party always was but that is not true. While hate filled magats always existed they were not driving the party agenda based on culture war hate.


So to, if a single life long log cabin Republican still holds his very 'right' views but sees Kirk as a threat... you automatically say 'that then makes him a leftist' ... and it does not.
Click to expand...

Now I'm stupid because I don't buy into your opinions?

You go off on tangents. Silly fantasy.
 
QP! said:
And understand Jarod, @Damocles is lying in his representations of what the family and others have said.

The statements i have seen have them only saying something like he was 'shifting more left', which if you grow up in a magat family and are a gay man, living a gay life, means you moved more left by default. Almost certainly you will have disagreements with your magat family over religious beliefs and old school republican beliefs about being gay in society.

That DOES not make you a leftist or a Dem as there are many gays, who fit that bill, who are very active Republicans, putting their cash behind republican causes (ie Peter Thiel) .

Magats here do not accept that two things can be true at the same time. A person can remain holding their republican/right identity while ALSO being gay and thus perceived by Magats, who are extreme right, as 'moving left'.
Click to expand...
Every time I fact check him, in the last month, he has stretched what they said to the max toward the Republican/Trump side.
 
QP! said:
This is the statement that shows how irredeemably stupid you truly are "...How could he be from the right if he hated Kirk and his message enough to kill him?..."

It is entirely possible for a log cabin republican who voted for Bush Sr, Bush Jr and Reagan, who was welcomed in to the party and who shared those espoused views of 'limited government, low debt and deficits' to also HATE the Magat take over of the party which now focuses on culture wars and the hate of trans and gay people and to see someone like Charlie kirk as a threat to them.


You are amongst the hate filled Magats RB so you think you are what the party always was but that is not true. While hate filled magats always existed they were not driving the party agenda based on culture war hate.


So to, if a single life long log cabin Republican still holds his very 'right' views but sees Kirk as a threat... you automatically say 'that then makes him a leftist' ... and it does not.
Click to expand...


It doesn't truly matter if the guy was more to the left or more to the right...he was a deranged person with problems that have nothing to do with politics. He was not in need of a political counsellor...he needed a psychiatrist.
 
Sample of Kirk comments

List of Notable Statements​


  • Called gender-affirming care “child mutilation,” and said being trans is “a mental delusion.” Attitude+3X (formerly Twitter)+3MambaOnline - LGBTQ South Africa online+3
  • Used religious language to condemn transgender people, e.g., calling trans people a “throbbing middle finger to God,” an “abomination,” and saying the transgender movement is “against our senses” and “against natural law.” Attitude+2MambaOnline - LGBTQ South Africa online+2

  • Suggesting that trans identities are a “social contagion,” especially among young people, and linking them to things like “puberty anxiety” and the autism spectrum. Attitude+2MambaOnline - LGBTQ South Africa online+2
  • Once said “We should have ‘just took care of’ trans people the way we used to take care of things in the 1950s and 60s,” which critics interpret as referencing involuntary institutionalization, lobotomies, etc. MambaOnline - LGBTQ South Africa online+2Attitude+2
  • Criticized what he called the “alphabet mafia” (a derisive term for LGBTQ+ community) and said society is “pandering to a hypervocal minority.” Advocate.com+2Attitude+2
  • Made comparisons that associate transgender people / gender-affirming care with violence or societal decay, such as blaming them for inflation, calling their existence a threat to “natural law,” etc. Newsweek+2Investing.com+2

  • Suggested overturning convictions of people who were arrested or fined for “hate crimes” involving Pride flags, or burning rainbow flags being legal. Attitude+1


@RB 60 reads above and says 'how could a gay or trans person who was right leaning before magats took over be bothered by Charlie Kirk being one of the loudest voices pushing this culture war issue which was putting gay and trans people on the front lines of a new hate war against them???

He says 'i do not believe, even if a gay or trans person saw it as a threat to themselves or their families they would turn against these magat culture warriors spreading hate and instead they would support the magats saying this'
 
RB 60 said:
Now I'm stupid because I don't buy into your opinions?

You go off on tangents. Silly fantasy.
Click to expand...
False.

You are stupid because you are "stupid".

You prove that by being unable to follow simple concept, such as you can support an ideology (Dem, GOP, Communism, other) but you can HATE a current person who is in that movement, for reasons other than the core politics.
 
QP! said:
Sample of Kirk comments

List of Notable Statements​


  • Called gender-affirming care “child mutilation,” and said being trans is “a mental delusion.” Attitude+3X (formerly Twitter)+3MambaOnline - LGBTQ South Africa online+3
  • Used religious language to condemn transgender people, e.g., calling trans people a “throbbing middle finger to God,” an “abomination,” and saying the transgender movement is “against our senses” and “against natural law.” Attitude+2MambaOnline - LGBTQ South Africa online+2

  • Suggesting that trans identities are a “social contagion,” especially among young people, and linking them to things like “puberty anxiety” and the autism spectrum. Attitude+2MambaOnline - LGBTQ South Africa online+2
  • Once said “We should have ‘just took care of’ trans people the way we used to take care of things in the 1950s and 60s,” which critics interpret as referencing involuntary institutionalization, lobotomies, etc. MambaOnline - LGBTQ South Africa online+2Attitude+2
  • Criticized what he called the “alphabet mafia” (a derisive term for LGBTQ+ community) and said society is “pandering to a hypervocal minority.” Advocate.com+2Attitude+2
  • Made comparisons that associate transgender people / gender-affirming care with violence or societal decay, such as blaming them for inflation, calling their existence a threat to “natural law,” etc. Newsweek+2Investing.com+2

  • Suggested overturning convictions of people who were arrested or fined for “hate crimes” involving Pride flags, or burning rainbow flags being legal. Attitude+1


@RB 60 reads above and says 'how could a gay or trans person who was right leaning before magats took over be bothered by Charlie Kirk being one of the loudest voices pushing this culture war issue which was putting gay and trans people on the front lines of a new hate war against them???

He says 'i do not believe, even if a gay or trans person saw it as a threat to themselves or their families they would turn against these magat culture warriors spreading hate and instead they would support the magats saying this'
Click to expand...

Psychobabble. One of the "loudest voices"? So then, in your opinion he deserved to die? How many more like him should they kill?
 
QP! said:
False.

You are stupid because you are "stupid".

You prove that by being unable to follow simple concept, such as you can support an ideology (Dem, GOP, Communism, other) but you can HATE a current person who is in that movement, for reasons other than the core politics.
Click to expand...

You calling me stupid is a complement.
 
archives said:
www.latimes.com

'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' will return to ABC on Tuesday after being benched by Disney

The move follows conversations between the two sides to figure out how to defuse the situation that began with Kimmel's comments in the aftermath of the shooting death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com
www.foxnews.com

Disney announces ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ returning Tuesday after suspension

ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!" will return on Tuesday after a brief suspension of the late-night program for the host's comments, The Walt Disney Company announced on Monday.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Going to piss off Trump and MAGA
Click to expand...
Where?
 
RB 60 said:
Psychobabble. One of the "loudest voices"? So then, in your opinion he deserved to die? How many more like him should they kill?
Click to expand...
They certainly don't understand what Charlie Kirk was all about... A lot of people are going to spend the rest of their lives making sure that they do... Because it's that important....
 
RB 60 said:
Psychobabble. One of the "loudest voices"? So then, in your opinion he deserved to die? How many more like him should they kill?
Click to expand...
More stupidity from you RB.

When it comes to both leftist voices and magat voices, someone has to be amongst the loudest by default. There is no way around that.

To jump from acknowledging that FACT to say 'then you must think he deserves to die' is stupid, even for you.

I could list 'who is amongst the loudest voices' for each topic from 'Green Energy and Global warming' (Al Gore, Greta, etc,) to Libertarianism (Rand Paul, etc) and simply naming them as the most vocal and oludest on those topics in no way is saying 'they should die'.


I said that stupid, even for you but i must correct myself as the stupidity level of that jump fits you perfectly. It is expected.
 
First time I've ever watched a monologue of his. I thought he addressed the issue really well. Naturally, most comments I've seen from the right said it was phony and "not enough." As though the right doesn't gaslight & jump to conclusions regularly.

We're a nation of hypocrites.
 
BartenderElite said:
First time I've ever watched a monologue of his. I thought he addressed the issue really well. Naturally, most comments I've seen from the right said it was phony and "not enough." As though the right doesn't gaslight & jump to conclusions regularly.

We're a nation of hypocrites.
Click to expand...
He started out well...but went just a bit too far..... So yes... that did take away from the sincerity of the moment...
 
If you like him you'll probably continue to stream the show and watch until his contract's up... If you didn't care for him and didn't watch the show , then now you're really sure why... My favorite part of this whole thing was watching people post themselves canceling hulu and disney plus...😆😆😆
 
BartenderElite said:
First time I've ever watched a monologue of his. I thought he addressed the issue really well. Naturally, most comments I've seen from the right said it was phony and "not enough." As though the right doesn't gaslight & jump to conclusions regularly.

We're a nation of hypocrites.
Click to expand...
They need to keep this front and center
 
BartenderElite said:
First time I've ever watched a monologue of his. I thought he addressed the issue really well. Naturally, most comments I've seen from the right said it was phony and "not enough." As though the right doesn't gaslight & jump to conclusions regularly.

We're a nation of hypocrites.
Click to expand...
There simply is no denying that as soon as Kirk was shot, Magats here and in the media, began pushing instantly, with no information, that the kiler was 'not a magat... and was of the left... or a Democrat... etc'.

The push was entirely political and meant to take advantage of his death to slag the left.

That is what Jimmy said, and what i was saying here in real time as it was disgusting behavior by the magats.

Jimmy was correct in what he said, as was it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top