When you make negative sweeping generalizations about blacks like Kirk did, you're a racist.
Redefinition fallacy. Racism is a compositional error involving people as the class and a genetic trait as the property.
Charlie Kirk never did this. Indeed, he spent much of his time pointing out the evil of this.
Deny the facts all you want, doesn't change anything.
Go learn what 'fact' means. It does NOT mean Universal Truth.
Here are specific examples of Kirk's statements, compiled from his podcast The Charlie Kirk Show and public appearances (many tracked by Media Matters for America):
Okay. Let's look at them.
Date | Quote | Context | Criticism |
---|
Jan. 23, 2024 | "If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified." | Discussing DEI in aviation after a Boeing incident. | Seen as implying Black professionals are inherently less competent due to race-based hiring. |
May 19, 2023 | "Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more." | Rant on interracial crime. | Accused of generalizing Black people as predatory criminals. |
Jan. 3, 2024 | "If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?" | Critiquing DEI with guest Heather Mac Donald. | Labeled sexist and racist for stereotyping Black women as unqualified. |
July 13, 2023 | "You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously." | Referring to Black women like Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Joy Reid, and Michelle Obama as "affirmative action picks." | Widely called dehumanizing and a direct attack on Black women's intelligence. |
2020 | Called George Floyd a "scumbag." | Response to Floyd's killing, which sparked Black Lives Matter protests. | Dismissed Black pain and police brutality as non-issues. |
Undated (general views) | Denied systemic racism exists; called "white privilege" a "racist idea"; vilified critical race theory as "indoctrination." | Broader commentary on U.S. history and policy. | Argued to erase structural inequities faced by people of color. |
2023 | "Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them." | Podcast on antisemitism accusations. | Labeled antisemitic for invoking tropes of Jewish control over "anti-white" causes. |
1/23: DEI in aviation is a problem, caused by Democrats and their affirmative action racism. Charlie was pointing this out. He is pointing out DEMOCRAT racism.
5/19: Inner city black gangs ARE predatory criminals. This is a GANG problem and a crime problem, not a race problem.
1/3: Pointing out the racism in the affirmative action program passed DEMOCRATS. It is not racism to point out racism.
7/13: They WERE affirmative action picks, and therefore not picked on their skill or qualifications. Again, it is NOT racism to point out racism.
2020: George Floyd WAS a scumbag. He had an extensive criminal history, much of it centered around violence and/or drugs. He wasn't killed. He died of a drug overdose (fentanyl) while police were attempting custody.
(undated): Again shows Charlie's desire to erase racism.
2023: He is right about Jewish communities. It is not antisemitism to point out irony.
The evidence shows Kirk made statements that objectively reinforced racial stereotypes
Never did, liar. He CONSTANTLY ARGUED AGAINST RACISM!
and dismissed historical injustices,
Never did, liar. He POINTED THEM OUT!
meeting common definitions of racism
There is only one definition of racism, which I've again reiterated above. Pointing out racism is not racism.
as prejudice plus power (per scholars like Ibram X. Kendi). These weren't abstract; they aligned with far-right narratives tracked by extremism watchdogs and drew bipartisan rebukes, including from the Congressional Black Caucus.
What is 'far right narratives'?
Buzzword fallacy