Federal probe into Trump foe Letitia James hits a standstill, law enforcement officials say

LurchAddams

LurchAddams

There Can be Only One!
Contributor
www.nbcnews.com

Federal probe into Trump foe Letitia James hits a standstill, law enforcement officials say

James, the New York attorney general, faces allegations of mortgage fraud by the Trump administration. She has denied any wrongdoing.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com

"The mortgage fraud investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James is at a standstill because federal agents and prosecutors don’t believe they have enough evidence to get a conviction if the case were to go to trial, two senior federal law enforcement officials told NBC News on Wednesday."

Oh, no! You mean the railroading isn't working? Poor vindictive little twump!
 
But the white house is saying, "FUCK THAT, IF YOU CAN'T FIND ANY EVIDENCE, MAKE SHIT UP LIKE WE'RE DOING WITH COMEY!"

"The White House and several top administration officials, however, have continued to push the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia to seek an indictment against James, who brought a civil fraud case against Donald Trump after his first term as president."
 
LurchAddams said:
But the white house is saying, "FUCK THAT, IF YOU CAN'T FIND ANY EVIDENCE, MAKE SHIT UP LIKE WE'RE DOING WITH COMEY!"

"The White House and several top administration officials, however, have continued to push the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia to seek an indictment against James, who brought a civil fraud case against Donald Trump after his first term as president."
Click to expand...
MSNBC is reporting that the top prosecutor of major crimes in Eastern Virginia is telling colleagues she won't prosecute Letitia James because there is no evidence of fraud.

www.msnbc.com

Top prosecutor is rejecting Trump pressure to charge New York AG

A key federal prosecutor in Virginia, where James Comey was indicted, is resisting bringing charges against Letitia James.
www.msnbc.com www.msnbc.com

Elizabeth Yusi, who oversees major criminal prosecutions in the Norfolk office of the Eastern District of Virginia, has confided to co-workers that she sees no probable cause to believe James engaged in mortgage fraud, the two sources told MSNBC. Yusi plans to present her conclusion to the president’s new interim U.S. attorney, Lindsey Halligan, in the coming weeks, they said.
Prosecutors in the Eastern District are now bracing for Yusi to be fired for her own resistance to try a case that many lawyers have said lacks sufficient evidence, according to the two people.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
MSNBC is reporting that the top prosecutor of major crimes in Eastern Virginia is telling colleagues she won't prosecute Letitia James because there is no evidence of fraud.

www.msnbc.com

Top prosecutor is rejecting Trump pressure to charge New York AG

A key federal prosecutor in Virginia, where James Comey was indicted, is resisting bringing charges against Letitia James.
www.msnbc.com www.msnbc.com

Elizabeth Yusi, who oversees major criminal prosecutions in the Norfolk office of the Eastern District of Virginia, has confided to co-workers that she sees no probable cause to believe James engaged in mortgage fraud, the two sources told MSNBC. Yusi plans to present her conclusion to the president’s new interim U.S. attorney, Lindsey Halligan, in the coming weeks, they said.
Prosecutors in the Eastern District are now bracing for Yusi to be fired for her own resistance to try a case that many lawyers have said lacks sufficient evidence, according to the two people.
Click to expand...
It amazes me how Republicans aren't even blinking at this disgusting waste of public resources - I thought they were all against "waste, fraud, and abuse"?
 
LurchAddams said:
It amazes me how Republicans aren't even blinking at this disgusting waste of public resources - I thought they were all against "waste, fraud, and abuse"?
Click to expand...
As an attorney, she knew well that she was committing fraud by declaring the Norfollk home as a secondary residence. It was stupid for two reasons:
1. She should have at least made an attempt to reside there part time
2. She should never have prosecuted Trump for something no AG would bother with had Trump not been president knowing full well she had committed fraud herself.
Now it's going to cost her more in legal fees than any amount she saved had she gotten away with fraud.
Stupid.

As the saying goes, 'don't throw stones if you live in a glass house'.
She should've expected this.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
MSNBC is reporting that the top prosecutor of major crimes in Eastern Virginia is telling colleagues she won't prosecute Letitia James because there is no evidence of fraud.
Click to expand...
The evidence is practically slam dunk.
You should read what a real estate lawyer has to say about this:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1976613983785267214
View: https://x.com/SMB_Attorney/status/1976613983785267214


Sure enuf, he was indicted. If there was lack of evidence that couldn't have happened.
 
LurchAddams said:
But the white house is saying, "FUCK THAT, IF YOU CAN'T FIND ANY EVIDENCE, MAKE SHIT UP LIKE WE'RE DOING WITH COMEY!"

"The White House and several top administration officials, however, have continued to push the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia to seek an indictment against James, who brought a civil fraud case against Donald Trump after his first term as president."
Click to expand...
Total waste of taxpayers money, on this real witch hunt?!!
 
What? The feds can't just force her to accept a bench trial in front of a judge that openly hates her and will exclude exculpatory evidence on a whim? What's our justice system coming to? :rolleyes:
 
anonymoose said:
As an attorney, she knew well that she was committing fraud by declaring the Norfollk home as a secondary residence. It was stupid for two reasons:
1. She should have at least made an attempt to reside there part time
2. She should never have prosecuted Trump for something no AG would bother with had Trump not been president knowing full well she had committed fraud herself.
Now it's going to cost her more in legal fees than any amount she saved had she gotten away with fraud.
Stupid.

As the saying goes, 'don't throw stones if you live in a glass house'.
She should've expected this.

The evidence is practically slam dunk.
You should read what a real estate lawyer has to say about this:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1976613983785267214
View: https://x.com/SMB_Attorney/status/1976613983785267214


Sure enuf, he was indicted. If there was lack of evidence that couldn't have happened.
Click to expand...
The fraud you are talking about his yet to be proven, all just accusations at this point, and accusations don’t prove guilt
 
anonymoose said:
As an attorney, she knew well that she was committing fraud by declaring the Norfollk home as a secondary residence. It was stupid for two reasons:
1. She should have at least made an attempt to reside there part time
2. She should never have prosecuted Trump for something no AG would bother with had Trump not been president knowing full well she had committed fraud herself.
Now it's going to cost her more in legal fees than any amount she saved had she gotten away with fraud.
Stupid.

As the saying goes, 'don't throw stones if you live in a glass house'.
She should've expected this.

The evidence is practically slam dunk.
You should read what a real estate lawyer has to say about this:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1976613983785267214
View: https://x.com/SMB_Attorney/status/1976613983785267214


Sure enuf, he was indicted. If there was lack of evidence that couldn't have happened.
Click to expand...
I guess DOJ never thought of that, or perhaps there is an issue with your facts. I suspect it’s the latter.
 
archives said:
The fraud you are talking about his yet to be proven,
Click to expand...
archives said:
all just accusations at this point, and accusations don’t prove guilt
Click to expand...
Well duh. Of course she’s innocent until proven guilty. That’s why there will be a trial. :palm:

However,
On 2020 New York ethics forms, James reported $1,000–$5,000 in “rental income” from the property.

• Federal tax returns treated it as “rental real estate,” claiming deductions for expenses while reporting rents received.
• She informed her insurer it was “owner-occupied,” contradicting the rental use.
Actual Use:
• The home has been continuously occupied by her grandniece, Nakia Thompson (age 36), and Thompson’s three children since 2020—shortly after purchase

We shall see at trial.
But like I said , don’t throw stones if you live in a glass house.
If proven she did commit fraud, it was incredibly stupid for her to go after Trump . But the plan was not for him to get elected.
 
anonymoose said:
Well duh. Of course she’s innocent until proven guilty. That’s why there will be a trial. :palm:

However,
On 2020 New York ethics forms, James reported $1,000–$5,000 in “rental income” from the property.

• Federal tax returns treated it as “rental real estate,” claiming deductions for expenses while reporting rents received.
• She informed her insurer it was “owner-occupied,” contradicting the rental use.
Actual Use:
• The home has been continuously occupied by her grandniece, Nakia Thompson (age 36), and Thompson’s three children since 2020—shortly after purchase

We shall see at trial.
But like I said , don’t throw stones if you live in a glass house.
If proven she did commit fraud, it was incredibly stupid for her to go after Trump . But the plan was not for him to get elected.
Click to expand...
But your implying she is guilty
 
anonymoose said:
As an attorney, she knew well that she was committing fraud by declaring the Norfollk home as a secondary residence. It was stupid for two reasons:
1. She should have at least made an attempt to reside there part time
2. She should never have prosecuted Trump for something no AG would bother with had Trump not been president knowing full well she had committed fraud herself.
Now it's going to cost her more in legal fees than any amount she saved had she gotten away with fraud.
Stupid.

As the saying goes, 'don't throw stones if you live in a glass house'.
She should've expected this.

The evidence is practically slam dunk.
You should read what a real estate lawyer has to say about this:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1976613983785267214
View: https://x.com/SMB_Attorney/status/1976613983785267214


Sure enuf, he was indicted. If there was lack of evidence that couldn't have happened.
Click to expand...
It's a waste of resources. Like Comey's railroad attempt, it's going to get thrown out before it even starts.
 
anonymoose said:
Well duh. Of course she’s innocent until proven guilty. That’s why there will be a trial. :palm:

However,
On 2020 New York ethics forms, James reported $1,000–$5,000 in “rental income” from the property.

• Federal tax returns treated it as “rental real estate,” claiming deductions for expenses while reporting rents received.
• She informed her insurer it was “owner-occupied,” contradicting the rental use.
Actual Use:
• The home has been continuously occupied by her grandniece, Nakia Thompson (age 36), and Thompson’s three children since 2020—shortly after purchase

We shall see at trial.
But like I said , don’t throw stones if you live in a glass house.
If proven she did commit fraud, it was incredibly stupid for her to go after Trump . But the plan was not for him to get elected.
Click to expand...
:sadbaby:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top