All Republicans should apologize for the oil spill

signalmankenneth

Verified User
By Brent Budowsky - 06/18/10 10:45 AM ET

If Republicans were still in control, they would favor a BP bailout for the oil spill, as the last Republican president created the bailout for the banks. And the Tea Party people should demand a Republican apology, or they are simply Republican hacks wearing Tea Party costumes.

Where President Obama went wrong on the oil spill was that he didn't move fast enough to reverse Republican policies. Where Obama went right was to realize that BP, not taxpayers, should pay for the oil spill.

Where Republicans keep going wrong is that by attacking the president for his plan to get BP to pay, they prove their real intent is to again shake down taxpayers.

If BP does not pay through the fund that Republicans oppose, taxpayers will pay through a bailout of BP. It's that simple.

The political blunder of Texas Republican Rep. Joe Barton was that he revealed the true position of many Republicans. He reminded voters that the oil spill was the inevitable result of Republican philosophy.

Get this straight, folks. Listen to Republicans, you get the BP bailout. Here's the smoking gun that convicts the guilty GOP party:

It was not one member, but the House of Republicans, who attacked President Obama for his success creating a $20 billion fund, financed by BP, to help those harmed by BP's oil spill.

Good grief. If House Republicans oppose the BP-financed escrow fund, the alternative they must favor is that taxpayers, not BP, would finance the fund. In short, the inevitable result of Republican policy is that if BP does not pay for the fund, the taxpayers must pay for the fund.

By opposing what they call a shakedown of BP, Republicans leave only one option: a shakedown of taxpayers. This is the smoking gun.

It was Republican philosophy of deregulating offshore drilling that planted the seeds that caused the spill. It was Republican philosophy that opposed government protecting the people and the environment on drilling. Now we know, the environmentalists and liberals were right all along.

It was a Republican president, George W. Bush, who fathered the bailout of the banks. During his administration, the corruption of mining regulation became worse than ever.

It was a Republican vice president, Dick Cheney, who held secret energy meetings in the White House.

Republicans should apologize to the people living near the Gulf. They should apologize to the American people. They should apologize to taxpayers. Their philosophy caused the crises. Their leaders mismanaged the drilling for eight long years. Their policies would lead to a BP bailout today. The Democrats are not perfect, but the Republicans were dead wrong for decades. They are dead wrong today. They should apologize to the nation and learn from their mistakes.

day-tb-enough.jpg


bp-bush-allegiance.jpg


cheney-barrel.jpg
 
The Tea Party has never supported bailouts and it will never support paying for BP's mess.

That is a significant difference between the GOP and the Tea Party. And Democrats cannot claim any higher ground.

But in defense of the GOP, they were largely against George W. Bush when he initiated the bailouts. It's the Democrats who overwhelmingly voted for it and absolutely dwarfed the Bush-years spending under Obama.

Suddenly, when they thought they were going to get blamed in November '08 for crashing the economy, the most liberal Democrats in Congress thought George W. Bush had a great idea worth voting for in droves.
 
Man.... I wish BRENT posted here instead of Kenney!

By Brent Budowsky - 06/18/10 10:45 AM ET

If Republicans were still in control, they would favor a BP bailout for the oil spill, as the last Republican president created the bailout for the banks. And the Tea Party people should demand a Republican apology, or they are simply Republican hacks wearing Tea Party costumes.

Tea Party people: Hello, GOP? We demand you apologize for what Brent says you would do if you and Bush were still in power!

GOP: Okay, we apologize! We didn't mean to not really do it! If we could take that back, we would.. oh wait, we probably wouldn't. But we apologize for that too! We are deeply sorry!

Tea Party people: Thanks GOP, say hi to Mitch McConnell! We're off to have our costumes cleaned!

Satisfied, Brent???

Where President Obama went wrong on the oil spill was that he didn't move fast enough to reverse Republican policies. Where Obama went right was to realize that BP, not taxpayers, should pay for the oil spill.

Brent, you started out really good, you should have stopped with; He didn't move fast enough. That seems to be the concensus with most of America, from the left to the right. Realizing that BP should pay for the disaster, is something that pretty much every American did the first day, regardless of which "side" they are on. Even BP realizes they have to pay for this, which is why they ponied up Obama's extortion money so voluntarily. The only place people think BP shouldn't be held financially responsible for this disaster, is in your very small pinheaded brain. Those who are actually on the right in the real world, think there is some responsibility to be beared by government as well, it was the government who was supposed to be ensuring BP was following the guidelines we set for what they did. It was government who failed to do this, which contributed to the results. Democrats seem to want to lay ALL the responsibility and blame on BP, and ignore the failure of their beloved Big Government, to do the job it should have done, not only before the disaster, but afterwards as well. Obama has STILL not mobilized FEMA!

Where Republicans keep going wrong is that by attacking the president for his plan to get BP to pay, they prove their real intent is to again shake down taxpayers.

What republicans attacked, was the president focusing on who was going to pay for this, and "kicking some asses" rather than mobilizing effective disaster response and dealing with the disaster that is STILL unfolding in the gulf. We all know BP is going to pay! We knew this on Day 1, and no one is arguing they shouldn't! To my knowledge, BP has already paid $20 billion... I didn't see the Tea Party protestors out there on the steps of the Capitol over it... haven't heard the outrage and condemnation from Sarah Palin or Glenn Beck about it... Seems to me, everyone is fairly okay with BP paying for this! Now, can we get some emergency disaster relief efforts going, and deal with the millions of gallons of oil filling up the gulf of mexico? TODAY MAYBE?

If BP does not pay through the fund that Republicans oppose, taxpayers will pay through a bailout of BP. It's that simple.

Seems to me, you are obsessed with the money, Brent? How in the fuck is the United States Congress going to bail out BRITISH Petroleum? Are ALL Liberals really as utterly stupid as you are? Does it even dawn on your profoundly empty pinhead, that BRITISH Petroleum is not an American company, and thus, not the responsibility of the American taxpayer?

The political blunder of Texas Republican Rep. Joe Barton was that he revealed the true position of many Republicans. He reminded voters that the oil spill was the inevitable result of Republican philosophy.

Get this straight, folks. Listen to Republicans, you get the BP bailout. Here's the smoking gun that convicts the guilty GOP party:

It was not one member, but the House of Republicans, who attacked President Obama for his success creating a $20 billion fund, financed by BP, to help those harmed by BP's oil spill.

Good grief. If House Republicans oppose the BP-financed escrow fund, the alternative they must favor is that taxpayers, not BP, would finance the fund. In short, the inevitable result of Republican policy is that if BP does not pay for the fund, the taxpayers must pay for the fund.

By opposing what they call a shakedown of BP, Republicans leave only one option: a shakedown of taxpayers. This is the smoking gun.

*sigh* ....If only the smoking gun were pointed at Brent's PINHEAD!

Brent, what we are complaining about, is a $20 billion slush fund for politicians to fritter away like Paris Hilton in a little dog shop! If it were being distributed to the governors of the effected states, so it could go immediately to clean up and containment efforts, there wouldn't be a problem!

And Brent, you seem awful worried about shaking down the taxpayers, I hate to be the one to inform you of this, but your health care bill will result in the biggest shakedown the taxpayers have ever seen, and we already know that is coming, Obama has already said so. Now seems to be a strange time for you to be all concerned about shaking down taxpayers, doesn't it?

It was Republican philosophy of deregulating offshore drilling that planted the seeds that caused the spill. It was Republican philosophy that opposed government protecting the people and the environment on drilling. Now we know, the environmentalists and liberals were right all along.

No, we don't know this, and no it wasn't deregulation which planted any seed. It was a lack of government officials doing their job and effectively monitoring what they were responsible for. It was environmentalists who lobbied for and supported a bill to offer incentives on royalties for deep water drilling, in order to discourage shallow water drilling along the coastlines. It is environmentalists who continue to prohibit drilling in much safer waters, as well as ANWR. What we now know is, Government is not suited to deal with regulation of the oil industry or mitigating a disaster. And we know environmentalists and liberals are PINHEADS!
 
:cof1:

I am still waiting for the democrats to apologize for Obama.

Oh, in another 6 months, I doubt you'll find any of the dishonest little bastards who'll even admit they voted for him! Those who do, will have some pity story about how Bush made them so angry they didn't realize what they were doing!
 
Oh, in another 6 months, I doubt you'll find any of the dishonest little bastards who'll even admit they voted for him! Those who do, will have some pity story about how Bush made them so angry they didn't realize what they were doing!

LOL

Says the Bush lover who now says "oh, I never really liked him that much."

Obama will be a 2-termer. Gonna be rough on you....
 
LOL

Says the Bush lover who now says "oh, I never really liked him that much."

Obama will be a 2-termer. Gonna be rough on you....

No, I said I didn't like Bush much when he won the GOP primaries. I never denied voting for him over the pinhead candidate. I disagreed with him on several things over the course of his two terms, but I still believe he was better than the alternative.

Obama will be lucky to get through ONE term.
 
No, I said I didn't like Bush much when he won the GOP primaries. I never denied voting for him over the pinhead candidate. I disagreed with him on several things over the course of his two terms, but I still believe he was better than the alternative.

Obama will be lucky to get through ONE term.

You said you loved him.

I think you said it like this: "I love George W. Bush!"

Remember?
 
odd...given you're doing your best to police and get your gotcha moment

apparently i intruded on your happy time...carry on :)

Is that a gotcha moment? Really?

I'm pleased to have the board police to define such intricacies, Yurtsie!

Dixie, I stand corrected. Carry on with your denial! The cavalry has arrived in the form of Yurtsie....

:cool:
 
Is that a gotcha moment? Really?

I'm pleased to have the board police to define such intricacies, Yurtsie!

Dixie, I stand corrected. Carry on with your denial! The cavalry has arrived in the form of Yurtsie....

:cool:

your dishonesty is so transparent its like watching a 5 year old tell his mommy that he didn't eat any of the cake, without realizing there is chocolate frosting all over his face...

sure, pulling up someone's exact quote to catch them being dishonest or whatever....is not a gotcha moment....:rolleyes:

its funny how you can dish it out dunceler, but can't take it...
 
your dishonesty is so transparent its like watching a 5 year old tell his mommy that he didn't eat any of the cake, without realizing there is chocolate frosting all over his face...

sure, pulling up someone's exact quote to catch them being dishonest or whatever....is not a gotcha moment....:rolleyes:

its funny how you can dish it out dunceler, but can't take it...

Eh - I can take things fine. You don't see me throwing little hissy fits all over the place like you do (every time you're busted on something, which is at a very alarming frequency).

Still, this response certainly doesn't rise to that occasion. You have yet to make an observation about me which is even close.

Yurtsie!

:cof1:
 
Back
Top