John Bolton has been INDICTED by a federal grand jury for mishandling classified information

well he is prosecuting Letisha James for misrepresentations on loan docs over something like $8000 of claimed lost interest to the bank when he and his magat derps screamed 'No Victim, no Crime' when he was shown to have defrauded the banks of millions for his misrepresentations on loan doc's and his magats, like @T. A. Gardner do back flips trying to justify it. So you can say irony is lost on them.
The banks were not defrauded by Trump....they were paid in full and the banks had no complaints.
 



iu
 
The banks were not defrauded by Trump....they were paid in full and the banks had no complaints.

You need to understand the laws and simply shut up until you do.

Trump did defraud the banks and whether they are ok with it or not, HAS NO IMPACT ON THE LAW.

You can say, 'you do not like that law', and you can say 'you do not agree with that law' but what you cannot say is that the law did not exist and that Trump did not break it, because he did.

The banks were never 'paid in full' as Trump lied to get lower rates and thus only paid the 'lower rate in full', and again no one cares if you or the bank say 'we are ok with that' as that DOES NOT change the laws Trump broke.
 
You need to understand the laws and simply shut up until you do.

Trump did defraud the banks and whether they are ok with it or not, HAS NO IMPACT ON THE LAW.

You can say, 'you do not like that law', and you can say 'you do not agree with that law' but what you cannot say is that the law did not exist and that Trump did not break it, because he did.

The banks were never 'paid in full' as Trump lied to get lower rates and thus only paid the 'lower rate in full', and again no one cares if you or the bank say 'we are ok with that' as that DOES NOT change the laws Trump broke.
No law was broken.....this is about the valuation of collateral....the banks and Trump agreed on the value of the collateral....the government has no jurisdiction to disagree with what they decided.

And the value of the collateral ended up not mattering, because he loans were paid in full.
 
No law was broken.....this is about the valuation of collateral....the banks and Trump agreed on the value of the collateral....the government has no jurisdiction to disagree with what they decided.

And the value of the collateral ended up not mattering, because he loans were paid in full.
Like i said, stupid people should not talk and you are proof of that.

This was litigated and Trump lost and the appeals upheld the 'Fraud' conviction. The law is clear.

You show with your incorrect summary of the case and what it was about that you are just a magat dupe falling for their lies. Trump told banks he had rezoning approval at 7 Springs property and that Mansions and other structures on the property were built and he valued the property as if complete. That was all a lie. He did not even have the zoning permit approved and none of the structures were built nor was the land yet serviced.

It was a 100% fabrication. You cannot do that and nor can Trump and not get charged. Go try it at banks where you live and even if they never give you a loan and reject you, but report you to police for false documents you will be charged.

Now, we know, as a stupid person you will say, 'nope i could do that and the police could not charge me' but you only believe that because you are stupid. Trump did that over and over in his filings. it is illegal. it is fraud.
 
This is just the opening salvo. I'm knee-deep in Eric Trump's book right now, and mark my words, if the Trump administration doesn't haul every last scumbag into court, those corrupt weasels who weaponized every branch of government to savage the entire Trump family and thousands of loyal supporters, they'll strut away thinking they can rerun the witch hunt on steroids next time, worse than ever. Bondi's got her work cut out, she'll need to work 24/7 just to nail 10% of the prison-bound filth, but she better hustle. Hillary that treasonous hag needs to be on the list, no question. Rip her slimy foundation to shreds, slap on crippling fines, that would only be a crumb of justice for the carnage she unleashed and the money stolen from the victims in Haiti for starters not to mention the money laundering allowing foreign 'donations' for favorable policy when she was the worst and most corrupt SOS in our history.
My daughter is getting the book for me.

I bet lots of Democrats are getting it too.
 
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fedc8f776-079f-4657-9b2f-2b0223258fb9_1868x1240.png



The people listed in the first six columns were defendants/subjects named in civil and criminal cases brought by Democrat prosecutors or states’ Attorneys General between 2016 and 2024.

Add John Bolton to column seven.
 
@Hawkeye10 is so stupid he argues loan brokers can submit NINJA loans (no income, no job) like they were in pre 2008 Bank crash, by lying about the person income and job, as they did, and no law is broken until those loans are funded and start to fail. He is arguing that even if some banks report them for the loans but do not fund them the law can do nothing to charge and close those shops because no bank lost any money.

This is a crime guys who work in used car dealership finance offices get charged with all the time and yet Hawkeye, in his stupidity says it is not a crime. That you cannot have a documents without a bank suffering a loss.

The entire purpose of the law is to try and prevent things like the 2008 crash happening due to wrongly priced fraudulent credit being in the system and performing to a point, until it crashes and because it was not priced properly for the risk, it puts the bank at risk.

A stupid person, like Hawkeye says 'dont care as i do not like that law so i will say it does not exist', but it does exist and Trump broke it, in the same way a loan broker does submitting a NINJA loan, except Trumps was way worse.
 
You need to understand the laws and simply shut up until you do.
It is best to know the law, Kewpie. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Trump did defraud the banks
Never did.
and whether they are ok with it or not, HAS NO IMPACT ON THE LAW.
What law?
You can say, 'you do not like that law',
What law? You are being awfully vague about this.
and you can say 'you do not agree with that law' but what you cannot say is that the law did not exist and that Trump did not break it, because he did.
What law?
The banks were never 'paid in full'
They were paid in full. The loan was satisfied.
as Trump lied to get lower rates
What was the lie?
and thus only paid the 'lower rate in full', and again no one cares if you or the bank say 'we are ok with that' as that DOES NOT change the laws Trump broke.
What laws?
 
A federal grand jury on Thursday indicted former Trump national security adviser John Bolton on charges of mishandling classified information — accusing him of sending sensitive national security documents through a personal AOL email account.

The indictment alleges that Bolton knowingly transmitted materials related to foreign policy matters while communicating with outside

If convicted, Bolton could face up to 10 years in prison for each count of unauthorized transmission of classified material.


No one must ever tell the truth about the #FatFuehrer. I'm sure you Nazis are thrilled with this weaponization of the government aganist the political critics of your #TangerineTyrant. Bet you missed the irony here -- that Trump did the EXACT SAME THING THAT BOLTON DID but somehow Trump escaped punishment. Is that something you care about?

Say, can you tell us who hired Bolton to begin with?
 
Like i said, stupid people should not talk and you are proof of that.

This was litigated and Trump lost and the appeals upheld the 'Fraud' conviction. The law is clear.
You cannot defend a kangaroo court. Both the prosecutor and the judge broke the law.
There was no fraud.
You show with your incorrect summary of the case
There was no case.
and what it was about that you are just a magat dupe falling for their lies.
He is not a Democrat.
Trump told banks he had rezoning approval at 7 Springs property and that Mansions and other structures on the property were built and he valued the property as if complete. That was all a lie. He did not even have the zoning permit approved and none of the structures were built nor was the land yet serviced.
Did you know that land has value even with partially completed buildings on it?
It was a 100% fabrication.
There was no fabrication. Indeed, the bank was satisfied with the value Trump used for collateral.
You cannot do that
You can do that.
and nor can Trump and not get charged.
What law?
Go try it at banks where you live and even if they never give you a loan and reject you, but report you to police for false documents you will be charged.
The banks conducted their own valuation and was satisfied with the claim, and issued the loan. That loan has been fully repaid. There is no fraud.
Now, we know, as a stupid person you will say, 'nope i could do that and the police could not charge me' but you only believe that because you are stupid. Trump did that over and over in his filings. it is illegal. it is fraud.
It is not illegal and there was no fraud.
 
No one must ever tell the truth about the #FatFuehrer. I'm sure you Nazis
It's 2025, moron.
are thrilled with this weaponization of the government
You can't blame Biden's or Democrat problems on Trump.
aganist the political critics of your #TangerineTyrant.
There is no tyranny, other than by Democrats.
Bet you missed the irony here
Fallacy fallacy.
-- that Trump did the EXACT SAME THING THAT BOLTON DID
No, he didn't.
but somehow Trump escaped punishment. Is that something you care about?
Punishment for what?
Say, can you tell us who hired Bolton to begin with?
Barak Obama.
 
No one must ever tell the truth about the #FatFuehrer. I'm sure you Nazis are thrilled with this weaponization of the government aganist the political critics of your #TangerineTyrant. Bet you missed the irony here -- that Trump did the EXACT SAME THING THAT BOLTON DID but somehow Trump escaped punishment. Is that something you care about?

Say, can you tell us who hired Bolton to begin with?
yup,

And if the early reporting holds true Bolton did far less then Trump.

Unlike Trump, the reporting so far said Bolton has every right to keep and maintain this material. it did not have to be returned. But all such material is governed by a law that says 'you must protect from disclosure to the public and even accidental disclosure is a crime'. That seems to be what they are trying to nail Bolton with. That his email being hacked or intercepted is the type of 'accidental disclosure that is a crime'. We will see if there is more to it than that but so far that seems to be it.
 
Back
Top