Ok good let’s ban AR-15’sThe Constitution was over the day they killed JFK.
Ok good let’s ban AR-15’sThe Constitution was over the day they killed JFK.
Why aren’t you out rioting with the rest of the far left loons?Ok good let’s ban AR-15’s
No riots are going on? Paranoid?Why aren’t you out rioting with the rest of the far left loons?
You can join the Hamas rioters.
Hamas is slaughtering their own Palestinians in Gaza, as we speak.
Ai is not the Constitution. The Supreme Court is not the Constitution. False authority fallacies.
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!It was written for people living here, stupid fuck. You don’t find “citizen”. You find “the people”.
Dumbfuck
WRONG.The US Constitution absolutely was written for all citizens of other countries who are within US jurisdiction, among others.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
The Constitution does not apply to people. It applies to GOVERNMENT.No, it sure is not written for just citizens. Most of it says “the people” and it applies to everyone here.
Free speech
Assembly
Religion
Fair trial
Due process
All of those, bitch.
Then, there’s your chronic stupidity about Democrats from history. They were conservatives. Just like you.
Food does not terrorize.It is possible that Lemon meant that innocent citizens should be prepared to shoot ICE when they try to improperly arrest them -- as continues to happen regularly because TACO's masked Gestapo are terrorizing law-abiding Americans.
Buzzword fallacies. Inversion fallacy. You can't blame YOUR problem on anybody else!You're not a conservative. You're a fascist. You also can't write for shit. I had to read your shart-post twice to try to translate it into English.
Enforcing the law is not criminal behavior.Lemon wasn't talking about "criminals".
Republican: "law abiding US citizens should be able to protect themselves from criminals.”
Don Lemon: “law abiding US citizens should be able to protect themselves from criminals.”
You're a racist idiot and a fucking asshole.
He doesn't understand English. He only speaks Liberal.Another thing I didn't realize about you was that you have trouble with reading English. So are you still going to refer Trump
to Hitler after witnessing Trump's worldwide peace negotiations and his total secure of our American southern border? You
have a lot of learning to go before you understand the meaning of Nazism, Hitlerism, Communism and Fascism. But, one thing
is sure, and that all of the aforementioned isms are closely if not completely tied to the Democrats, progressives, socialists
that make up the political left.
But there is a variation of the liberal language, and that is called Liberal Marxism.He doesn't understand English. He only speaks Liberal.
Lie.I don't have trouble reading English.
You do not know English at all. You only know Liberal.It's my second language, but I speak it better than you do. Typical of white trash Americans.
That you are.Compare Trump to Hitler? Or refer to Trump as Hitler? You illiterate fucking dumbass.
Courtier's fallacy. Attempted proof by elitism.I have a degree in political science. I know more about all of this than you do.
Go learn English.Oh jesus fucking christ. Did you even finish high school? The only one of those "isms" that lives on the left is communism. The rest are far right.
Not a variant. Liberal itself is based in Marxism.But there is a variation of the liberal language, and that is called Liberal Marxism.
Unconstitutional.Ok good let’s ban AR-15’s
Lie.No riots are going on?
Buzzword fallacy.Paranoid?
Denial of present.Why are you always so scared there might be be a riot.
You're right, and yet liberals don't know the difference between their dangerous/failed form of liberalism as compared toNot a variant. Liberal itself is based in Marxism.
There is no such thing as 'classical liberalism'You're right, and yet liberals don't know the difference between their dangerous/failed form of liberalism as compared to
the magnificent 'Classical Liberalism'.
There is no such thing as 'classical liberalism'
Great point. The Contsitution is a procedural document for how the government is to function, solidifying its limitations. Any power not expressly granted to the Federal government is reserved to the States or to We the People.The Constitution does not apply to people. It applies to GOVERNMENT.