Don Lemon thinks illegals can possess guns.

Classical liberalism is a political and economic philosophy that prioritizes individual liberty, limited government, and
a free-market economy.
That is a conservative, not a liberal. There is no such thing as 'classical liberalism'.
It also advocates for civil liberties under the rule of law and the protection of private property
rights.
That is a conservative, not a liberal.
This is the exact opposite of today's leftists' version of liberalism. I abide by my classical liberalism political
mindset, while hating today's leftist liberalism as shown by my moniker name.
There is no such thing as 'classical liberalism'.
 
Great point. The Contsitution is a procedural document for how the government is to function, solidifying its limitations. Any power not expressly granted to the Federal government is reserved to the States or to We the People.

Nonetheless, the US Constitution can be viewed as a statement to all nations: "All men are created equal; Inalienable rights enforced here." Nobody else has anything like it.
To this I agree.
 
That is a conservative, not a liberal. There is no such thing as 'classical liberalism'.

That is a conservative, not a liberal.

There is no such thing as 'classical liberalism'.

Look up the definition of classical liberalism to find out that it is most definitely a term that does describe Conservatism as
I've already stated. Of course classical conservatism describes a conservative so why are you continuing to say there is no
such thing as classical liberalism?
 
Look up the definition of classical liberalism
There is no such thing. Buzzword fallacy.
to find out that it is most definitely a term that does describe Conservatism as
Conservatives are not liberals.
I've already stated. Of course classical conservatism describes a conservative so why are you continuing to say there is no
such thing as classical liberalism?
There is no such thing as a classical conservative. There is no such thing as classical liberalism. Buzzword fallacies.
 
There is no such thing. Buzzword fallacy.

Conservatives are not liberals.

There is no such thing as a classical conservative. There is no such thing as classical liberalism. Buzzword fallacies.

You are totally wrong about believing there is no such thing as classical liberalism.. Try looking up the definition of classical liberalism,
and if you do so then tell me what it says.
 
Classical liberalism is a political and economic philosophy that prioritizes individual liberty, limited government, and
a free-market economy.
Forgive me, but you are describing classical Libertarianism, per its original charter at its founding, which is not to be confused with contemporary Libertarianism, i.e. the Marxist anarchy into which it has evolved, as represented by its current charter that has fundamentally changed many times. You are describing government and market characteristics, which imply Libertarianism.

Classical liberalism, on the other hand, discusses social views, like women being able to take out mortgages without requiring a husband to sign for it, or for blacks to not be denied a lease based on race, or for an end to Blue Laws, etc. Liberalism is centered around social views, not government.

This is the exact opposite of today's leftists' version of liberalism.
This is why we need to be careful with our wording, because you're right, today's leftists have Marxicized (Marxinated) the government, the Libertarian party, the DNC and has had a hand in filling the Republican Party with RINOs. You (and I both) want our country to move back towards the classical Libertarian charter, and away from the fascist tyranny of the Marxist DNC (aka "progressives", "social democrats", "democratic socialists", "socialists", etc.)

I abide by my classical liberalism political mindset, while hating today's leftist liberalism as shown by my moniker name.
You are standing true. Kudos.
 
Find a literate 10 year old. Have them read each post to you.
When your DEI indoctrination began covering "preferred pronouns" and taught you that you were a plural, you would have been wise to have slept through that.

Singulars are not plurals and plurals are not singulars. It's why DEI hires should be put in more menial jobs that don't require one to be competitive. You, for example, could probably be gainfully employed as an usher.
 
Did you even read the definition of classical liberalism from the Wikipedia link?
Friendly suggestion: if you can find a more authoritative source than Wikipedia, it would be benefit everyone to cite that something else. Wikipedia is a nonauthoritative source that is awash in errors, some very egregious. Also, anyone can contribute anything to Wikipedia; you might have written the Wikipedia article on "classical liberalism."
 
Friendly suggestion: if you can find a more authoritative source than Wikipedia, it would be benefit everyone to cite that something else. Wikipedia is a nonauthoritative source that is awash in errors, some very egregious. Also, anyone can contribute anything to Wikipedia; you might have written the Wikipedia article on "classical liberalism."





I do agree with you that Wikipedia isn't always that accurate since a lot of their political definitions/terms slant toward the LEFT, but not in this case.
 
“Black and Brown people need to get a gun legally. Go get your permit, go get your license, and learn how to use it,” Lemon said. “Because if ICE shows up at your door, you should be able to protect yourself and your family.”




So Don how does a Brown illegal get a gun legally so he can shoot at law enforcement?
More importantly, how does anyone start shooting at law enforcement when they show up at your door and not end up in the morgue?
 
I do agree with you that Wikipedia isn't always that accurate since a lot of their political definitions/terms slant toward the LEFT, but not in this case.
Wikipedia doesn't merely slant to the left; the people running Wikipedia have established a Marxist "quality control" board that ensures that the entirety of Wikipedia toes the Marxist party line. Quoting Wikipedia is like saying "See, I took this definition directly from Guno's post!"

The issue here is simply the use of Wikipedia, not your position. You found a different source, so box checked. Kudos.

Personally, I am one of many who summarily dismiss Wikipedia quotes/citations.
 
George Zimmerman shot and killed someone, you fucking retard.
George Zimmerman defended his own life from a maniacal, murderous piece of shit.

ed1eb80533fac451a4586cffcf093a50.jpg
 
Back
Top