christiefan915
Catalyst
15-year old thinking.
15-year old thinking.
15-year old thinking.![]()
I did listen. She read a speech someone, probably a man, wrote for her that generalized about women. So what if birth rates plummeted and who says it's only about women? I also noticed the tag TPUSA.com. She's regurgitating Charlie Kirk's spiel about women.So you say. Are any of the statistics she cited inaccurate?
I'll understand if you don't know, because I suspect you didn't listen to her.
I did listen.
She read a speech someone, probably a man, wrote for her that generalized about women.
So what if birth rates plummeted and who says it's only about women?
I also noticed the tag TPUSA.com.
She's regurgitating Charlie Kirk's spiel about women.
I did listen. How else would I have know she was only 15? But if you choose not to believe me, then it looks like this conversation is over.I don't believe you.
Pure speculation. You didn't listen, did you?
It seems that women are the only humans who can give birth, you see. It's science.
And that's when you prejudged her words and decide not to listen, isn't it?
Which was?
I'll understand if you don't know, naturally.
I did listen.
How else would I have know she was only 15?
But if you choose not to believe me, then it looks like this conversation is over.
"It stems back way further than me, at just 15 years old." Starting at 0:10.I doubt it.
You made it up. She's 24.
Your terms are acceptable.
"It stems back way further than me, at just 15 years old." Starting at 0:10.
<snort>The sheer amount of work this man puts in is astounding.
View: https://x.com/PressSec/status/1982259290778775971
No, that would be <gack>.<snort>