The Dementia Don is going nuts over the election

Dutch Uncle

* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The wannabe king is ranting on Truth Social about the election including seeking to negate the 9th and 10th Amendments.

All MAGAts continue to prove they are anti-American and anti-Constitution traitors. They are the enemy within.


 
Reading King Donald's TS page and listening to his press briefings, I was struck by MAGAts hypocrisy. They whined, bitched and moaned about "hate speech" in being called fascists yet support their king in continually referring to Democrats as "radicals", "communists" and "marxists". Weird!



 
Be ready for more and more magats to switch to 'Trump wanted Mamdani to win and to sabotage Cuomo by endorsing him and this was all 4D chess by him' .

This was a line @cawacko suggested yesterday until i showed him key Trump donors had jumped in and supported Cuomo's campaign and there was lots of polling exit interviews of those who had voted on the news last night, and of the 'self identified Trump voters' who answered questions the ones i saw all said 'they held their nose and voted Cuomo, as Trump had asked, because America was doomed if Mamdani won', or some version of Cuomo being the 'lesser of two evils'.
 
Be ready for more and more magats to switch to 'Trump wanted Mamdani to win and to sabotage Cuomo by endorsing him and this was all 4D chess by him' .

This was a line @cawacko suggested yesterday until i showed him key Trump donors had jumped in and supported Cuomo's campaign and there was lots of polling exit interviews of those who had voted on the news last night, and of the 'self identified Trump voters' who answered questions the ones i saw all said 'they held their nose and voted Cuomo, as Trump had asked, because America was doomed if Mamdani won', or some version of Cuomo being the 'lesser of two evils'.
Bruh, you are taking this really personally. I said I was speculating but that I felt Trump wanted Mamdani to win because he would make the perfect foil. And considering how unpopular Trump is in NYC, what better way to do that than endorse his opponent. And that has put you on tilt.
 
Bruh, you are taking this really personally. I said I was speculating but that I felt Trump wanted Mamdani to win because he would make the perfect foil. And considering how unpopular Trump is in NYC, what better way to do that than endorse his opponent. And that has put you on tilt.
I doubt many voters, if any at all, voted for Mamdani to spite Trump. The idea is one more misplaced Trumpism.
 
Bruh, you are taking this really personally. I said I was speculating but that I felt Trump wanted Mamdani to win because he would make the perfect foil. And considering how unpopular Trump is in NYC, what better way to do that than endorse his opponent. And that has put you on tilt.
I know you were speculating. I never said or suggested you had direct inside knowledge from Trump as to his motivations.

Why are you so on tilt about this? I relayed what you and others have proposed about this accurately and yet you seem so anxious that people now know you said it and offended that you would be quoted? Why are you so shook by what you said and so motivated to distance from it?

Just own and do not be so reactionary to people citing accurately what you said.
 
I doubt many voters, if any at all, voted for Mamdani to spite Trump. The idea is one more misplaced Trumpism.
it is just what many magats NEED to believe and tell themselves.

If Cuomo had won - Trump endorsement was key. Trump deserves credit.

If Mamdani wins - Maybe this was Trump 4D chess and he really knew his endorsement would hurt Cuomo. Trump deserves credit.

They want a world where both options are true and the result will tell them which was correct.
 
I doubt many voters, if any at all, voted for Mamdani to spite Trump. The idea is one more misplaced Trumpism.
There is a whole line of misunderstanding in this discussion. The idea that someone as unpopular as Trump endorsing someone in a blue City like NYC probably helps his opponent, isn't a Trumpism. That's just politics. Nor is that statement stating in any way that is the reason Mamdani won.
 
I know you were speculating. I never said or suggested you had direct inside knowledge from Trump as to his motivations.

Why are you so on tilt about this? I relayed what you and others have proposed about this accurately and yet you seem so anxious that people now know you said it and offended that you would be quoted? Why are you so shook by what you said and so motivated to distance from it?

Just own and do not be so reactionary to people citing accurately what you said.
That’s an impressive bit of flipping the script there, QP. You ever watch Key & Peele? Their substitute teacher sketch gets all the attention, but the text message one feels pretty fitting here.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaIB3NUxCMQ
 
it is just what many magats NEED to believe and tell themselves.

If Cuomo had won - Trump endorsement was key. Trump deserves credit.

If Mamdani wins - Maybe this was Trump 4D chess and he really knew his endorsement would hurt Cuomo. Trump deserves credit.

They want a world where both options are true and the result will tell them which was correct.
Whether it’s on purpose or not, I can’t answer, but you’re 100% missing my point here.
 
The wannabe king is ranting on Truth Social about the election including seeking to negate the 9th and 10th Amendments.

All MAGAts continue to prove they are anti-American and anti-Constitution traitors. They are the enemy within.


Whenever I see a thread starting with wannabe King, I know it's an unhinged liar on steroids. ;)
 
Reading King Donald's TS page and listening to his press briefings, I was struck by MAGAts hypocrisy. They whined, bitched and moaned about "hate speech" in being called fascists yet support their king in continually referring to Democrats as "radicals", "communists" and "marxists". Weird!



.....King Donald.....donthchyaknow.....
200.webp
 
Be ready for more and more magats to switch to 'Trump wanted Mamdani to win and to sabotage Cuomo by endorsing him and this was all 4D chess by him' .

This was a line @cawacko suggested yesterday until i showed him key Trump donors had jumped in and supported Cuomo's campaign and there was lots of polling exit interviews of those who had voted on the news last night, and of the 'self identified Trump voters' who answered questions the ones i saw all said 'they held their nose and voted Cuomo, as Trump had asked, because America was doomed if Mamdani won', or some version of Cuomo being the 'lesser of two evils'.
giphy.webp
 
There is a whole line of misunderstanding in this discussion. The idea that someone as unpopular as Trump endorsing someone in a blue City like NYC probably helps his opponent, isn't a Trumpism. That's just politics. Nor is that statement stating in any way that is the reason Mamdani won.

Sure but my reply on this topic was never solely to you. If you look it is only the magats suggesting that Trump may be pulling some kind of 4D chess move, while not taking the time to do minor investigation as to why that is not the case here.

Just because what you say may be true at times does not mean it is a default answer always. But there is NO DENYING that magats want to keep that option open in their mind and do not care if it is ever tested. Thus if Mamdani did win (he did) they have it as comfort for themselves that this was maybe part of Trumps grand plan.

Take you seem to take issue with me bursting that bubble is of no consequence to me.

That’s an impressive bit of flipping the script there, QP. You ever watch Key & Peele? Their substitute teacher sketch gets all the attention, but the text message one feels pretty fitting here.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaIB3NUxCMQ

Flipping the script is the only reasonable answer to the type of 'you mad', 'you shook' type trolling posts you made and others make. Simply replying 'you are wrong i am not mad/shook', just begets more trolling of 'proof you are shook or mad or you would not reply'.

If you write serious posts, i give serious replies. If you write trolling ones, i flip the script back at you. As i should.

Whether it’s on purpose or not, I can’t answer, but you’re 100% missing my point here.

Your point, is less important than the point i am making which, as stated above goes beyond just your reply, and needs to be said to burst that magat protection bubble.
 
Back
Top