Mass immigration in the news

What will be the mass migration from NYC?

:dunno: The question you should be asking is why the Bidenites opened the floodgates to millions of foreigners they assumed would vote to oppose the only political party that will enforce our immigration laws. If we don't wake up, those foreigners will elect more people who will flout, amend, or repeal our immigration laws for the benefit of the Democrat party.
 
:dunno: The question you should be asking is why the Bidenites opened the floodgates to millions of foreigners they assumed would vote to oppose the only political party that will enforce our immigration laws. If we don't wake up, those foreigners will elect more people who will flout, amend, or repeal our immigration laws for the benefit of the Democrat party.
You are preaching to the choir.
My position on the destruction of NYC has been clear. Hopefully, NYC will be a magnet for illegals and criminals, who are guaranteed that there will be no consequences for their actions. To quote the alt lefties, "If it saves one life".
 
Due to intentional mass replacement immigration, New York City is now a third world metropolis wearing the Big Apple as a skin suit

According to the data I've seen, people who were born in the USA didn’t largely support Mamdani, foreign-born voters did.

His election is not the beginning of the end for NYC, it’s a reminder that everything comes back to immigration.

If we don’t stop mass immigration and accelerate deportations and remigration, this will happen over and over again until the United States is nothing more than a disparate conglomeration of Mumbai, Mogadishu, and Mexico City.

This interpretation is plausible and supported by pre-election polling data, which shows Zohran Mamdani's' support was disproportionately driven by foreign-born voters in New York City.

While post-election breakdowns by birthplace aren't yet fully available (as of November 5, 2025), the available evidence from surveys and analyses is very interesting.

A Patriot Polling survey of registered voters (conducted October 18–19, 2025) provided the clearest split by birthplace, revealing a stark divide. Among U.S.-born New Yorkers, Andrew Cuomo led with 40% support, Mamdani trailed at 31%, and Curtis Sliwa had 25%.

Among foreign-born New Yorkers, Mamdani dominated with 62% support, compared to Cuomo's 24% and Sliwa's 12%.This gap was echoed in other polls and analyses.

An Emerson College/PIX11 News poll (released October 30, 2025) previewed similar trends, with Mamdani at 71% among foreign-born black voters and 62% among foreign-born respondents overall.

Documented's analysis of primary results (June 2025) found Mamdani winning a majority of first-round votes in “immigrant neighborhoods” (defined as areas where more than 50% of residents were born outside the U.S.), including South Asian, East Asian, and Latino enclaves in Queens and the Bronx.

About 37% of New York City’s population (roughly 3.1–3.3 million people) is foreign-born, per U.S. Census data.

Among registered voters, this group turns out at rates comparable to or higher than native-born voters in urban elections, especially in boroughs like Queens (Mamdani’s district).

Mamdani’s campaign emphasized affordability—rent freezes, free buses, a $30/hour minimum wage—which resonated in immigrant communities.

He won big in South Asian (58% of Asian vote), Latino (30+ point margin), and Muslim enclaves, per exit polls from NBC News and India Today, hardly right-wing spin machines.

Post-election analyses from The New York Times and USA Today highlight his surge in “working-class immigrant enclaves in Queens and the Bronx,” offsetting weaker support among native-born groups like older white voters and Orthodox Jews.

Mamdani secured over 1 million votes (about 50%+ of the total) in a high-turnout election (with over 2 million ballots supposedly cast, he highest in 50 years). If foreign-born voters (estimated 30–40% of the electorate) backed him at 62%, that bloc alone could have delivered 300,000–400,000 votes, enough to tip the scales given his narrower 31% among U.S.-born voters.
Not all foreign-born voters went for him. He underperformed in some Caribbean and Russian enclaves where resident have recent experience with Communist/Socialist policies.

In short, foreign-born voters weren’t just a plurality of Mamdani’s base. They were likely the majority driver of his margin. This reflects broader trends in immigrant-heavy urban elections.



 
My position on the destruction of NYC has been clear. Hopefully, NYC will be a magnet for illegals and criminals, who are guaranteed that there will be no consequences for their actions. To quote the alt lefties, "If it saves one life".

I don't believe you've thought this through.

The fate of one of the greatest cities in the history of the world has been delivered to a vast foreign-born population whose values and traditions are incompatible with American ideals and traditions.

Despite the fact that NYC has already been a magnet for illegals and criminals for decades, you're ignoring the fact that the metropolis is a touchstone and icon of America, and the federal government is obliged to spend taxpayers dollars there to mitigate the damage done by local elected officials.

This is in no wise good, nor is it even mildly amusing.
 
Muslim Brotherhood leaders openly explain how they plan to conquer America and Europe and destroy Western civilization: “Muslims tried and failed to conquer Europe for 700 years through war. But now there’s a much easier way: we can peacefully infiltrate via immigration, with help from naive Western governments and voters.”

Pay close attention, and you’ll understand how New York and London ended up with Muslim mayors.



View: https://x.com/realMaalouf/status/1986017308788101192
 
Mamdani did not win because he convinced people of anything. He won because NYC is flooded with immigrant voters who don’t care about fleecing the country they came to.

We badly need immigration reform and election security in all 50 states plus DC.
 
I don't believe you've thought this through.

The fate of one of the greatest cities in the history of the world has been delivered to a vast foreign-born population whose values and traditions are incompatible with American ideals and traditions.

Despite the fact that NYC has already been a magnet for illegals and criminals for decades, you're ignoring the fact that the metropolis is a touchstone and icon of America, and the federal government is obliged to spend taxpayers dollars there to mitigate the damage done by local elected officials.

This is in no wise good, nor is it even mildly amusing.
Sorry, but this is the natural result of unchecked immigration.
My wife and I were sitting in a cafe in Paris back in 2001. The business was slow, and I asked the waiter how did the city operate when much of the working population takes the entire month of August as vacation time. I followed it up asking about their SS program.
He said he was dismayed that the French were not producing enough offspring to support all the French social programs, but they have discovered a way to continue receiving all the government benefits by importing workers from Muslim countries to fill the government coffers with $.

He did not understand that the Muslim plan is to take over the world through reproduction. Babies, not bullets.

London has fallen,
Malmö has fallen,
Paris has fallen,
NYC is falling,
Minneapolis has fallen,
Dearborn has fallen,

Buckle up.
 
There’s no way to convince immigrants to embrace American governance.

I doubt that Juan, Muhammad, Rajiv, and Yusuf are remotely interested in reading the Constitution and deciding to abide by it.

It seems far more likely that they’re interested in what politicians can do for their respective ethnic factions.

This is obviously more important to them than any national allegiance.
 
I totally agree that immigration is the primal factor in understanding the current decline of America.


A nation that was designed and founded for a White (European/Germanic) people and their Western (Christian culture cannot function when it is demographically over-rum by coloured/non-Christian/uncivilised foreign invaders,


In November of 1965, Lyndon Johnson ratified the "Immigration and Naturalisation Act " (INA) that triggered this mass foreign invasion of coloured Third=World immigrants into the US.. It reached a suicidal climax recently under the Biden administration's "Open Border" policies. The latter being a direct consequence of LBJ's 1965 INA...


I am not sure that anything can be done now to save the American "experiment." Doing so would require the rapid, mass deportation of Black, Muslim, Hispanic/Latino, Middle Eastern., mixed-race. etc; "American citizens. I do not think this is politically possible now.


The recent election of Zohran Mamdani - a Black, communist (Marxist) Islamic extremist and enemy of the American republic - as the Mayor of NYC was another consequence of Johnson's, 1965, INA.


Dachshund the Wonder Hound

DLM... DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER!!
 
G5AXD59WQAAg0fh
 
Back
Top