Into the Night
Verified User
Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.no you haven't.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.no you haven't.
speak for yourself, no backbone man.No, NoName. Your moral standards change with time just as it does for everyone.
Redefinition fallacy.Yes.
Morality is a set of behaviors and attitudes that facilitate voluntary, cooperative, and mutually beneficial relationships.
yeah. you keep saying that.Redefinition fallacy.
Because you keep doing it.yeah. you keep saying that.
Already have. RQAAand you never provide your own.
Already have. RQAAand no, you haven't already.
Inversion fallacy.just stfu with your bullshit.
My definition accords with every legal and scholarly definition of genocide.Ok, so you have your own definition of genocide that doesn't include an actual attempt, and intent, to wipe out the group that is the victim of the genocide. That's fine.
Which is exactly what I said.Correction: Systematic MASS killing of civilian noncombatants
Scholarly is fine, but you keep referencing "systematic" killing and that isn't a criteria for the international, legal definition of genocide.My definition accords with every legal and scholarly definition of genocide.
Absolutely it is. The essence of genocide.Scholarly is fine, but you keep referencing "systematic" killing and that isn't a criteria for the international, legal definition of genocide.
Link to what? Go look it up yourself.Link?
I have and did again. Nowhere in this doc is "systematic".Link to what? Go look it up yourself.
Go find in that text where is says SYSTEMATIC is NOT a property of genocide.I have and did again. Nowhere in this doc is "systematic".
What is the source of your definition?
Like I said earlier, you can make up whatever definition you'd like, just don't expect anyone to care when there is an internationally, accepted definition.Go find in that text where is says SYSTEMATIC is NOT a property of genocide.
Article II In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:Like I said earlier, you can make up whatever definition you'd like, just don't expect anyone to care when there is an internationally, accepted definition.
gen·o·cideLike I said earlier, you can make up whatever definition you'd like, just don't expect anyone to care when there is an internationally, accepted definition.
I have and did again. Nowhere in this doc is "systematic".
What is the source of your definition?
| Al Letson: | You’ve said in the past that Jews in particular need to speak out about what’s happening and how history will look back at this time period. Why do you think it’s so important for Jewish people to speak up at this time? |
| Jason Stanley: | Well, first of all, because the genocide is being perpetrated in our name, there’s a long tradition of European Jews from which I come who do not accept, from my father’s side. My mother’s Polish Jewish and has very different views about Israel than I do, and I’m not questioning, I don’t know what it means to question the existence of a state as Israel’s there, nobody should be killed in Israel, nobody should be moved away from Israel, it’s there, but Israel should stop the practice of apartheid. Obviously, they should not commit a genocide, and it’s the first televised genocide in human history.
I study fascism. I’ve already fled America.On this week’s “More To The Story,” former Yale philosophy professor Jason Stanley explains his recent move to Canada and calls the Trump administration’s takeover of the US government a “coup.”
|
Right. Systematic isn't in there.Article II In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
What does "intent" mean to you? Without consulting a dictionary, tell me?Right. Systematic isn't in there.