SCOTUS protects marriage equality

They to have equal treatment because SCOTUS forced the religious right to give them equal treatment.
They already have equal treatment.
Otherwise, no, they would not have equal treatment is many states. Equal treatment = having your relationship legally recognized as a marriage by the state.
They already have equal treatment. They don't get to hijack the word 'marriage'. They don't get to force me to make a wedding cake for them. They don't get supremacy over me or anyone else.
 
They already have equal treatment.
They wouldn't have equal treatment if people like you had their way.
They already have equal treatment. They don't get to hijack the word 'marriage'. They don't get to force me to make a wedding cake for them. They don't get supremacy over me or anyone else.
Right, so then you don't want equal treatment because true equal treatment would be if we all had the ability to have the relationship we wanted to be legally recognized in the same manner. None of this separate but equal nonsense.

You see, nobody is trying to hijack anything. The religious right is trying to lay claim to a word they don't own.

At one point, "voter" meant a white, male. Equality means women get to vote, not that women get to vote in their own separate but equal election because the men want to lay claim to the word "voter".

The attempt to lay claim to voter or marriage is the supremacy you're projecting onto others.
 
They already have equal treatment.
Thanks to SCOTUS.
They alreadwy have equal treatment. They don't get to hijack the word 'marriage'.
There is no hijacking.
They don't get to force me to make a wedding cake for them.
You mean artistic expressions on cakes? You're correct. However businesses have to serve everyone equally. See Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
They don't get supremacy over me or anyone else.
What supremacy? Are they controlling you? Having undue influence on you?
 
They wouldn't have equal treatment if people like you had their way.
So they DO have equal treatment?
So what's the issue then?
Right, so then you don't want equal treatment because true equal treatment
"true equal treatment" ... is this just leftist speak for SUPREMACY?
would be if we all had the ability to have the relationship we wanted to be legally recognized in the same manner. None of this separate but equal nonsense.
Ahhhh, yup, so you ARE demanding SUPREMACY.

It's simply not good enough for you that an adult man and another adult man can be legally "joined together" and receive the very same legal treatment that any married couple receives. Nooooooooo, you just CAN'T stop there, can you? ... You must also DEMAND that I BOW DOWN to ALL the ridiculous demands of the LGBTQLMNOPALPHABETSOUP+ movement, including but not limited to:

Hijacking the word 'marriage' and forcing others to use that word to describe any union between a man/man or a woman/woman; always LOUDLY and PROUDLY making sure that everybody within a 200 mile radius knows juuuuuust how sexually deviant they are; forcing women to get the ever-loving SHIT beat out of them by men during sanctioned sporting events; forcing women to shower with, and change clothes in front of, men inside of women's locker rooms; forcing genital mutilation upon children without any parental consent, and taking children away from parents who don't consent to such mutilation; ... ... ...
You see, nobody is trying to hijack anything.
Lie.
 
Last edited:
So they DO have equal treatment?
So what's the issue then?

"true equal treatment" ... is this just leftist speak for SUPREMACY?

Ahhhh, yup, so you ARE demanding SUPREMACY.

It's simply not good enough for you that an adult man and another adult man can be legally "joined together" and receive the very same legal treatment that any married couple receives. Nooooooooo, you just CAN'T stop there, can you? ... You must also DEMAND that I BOW DOWN to ALL the ridiculous demands of the LGBTQLMNOPALPHABETSOUP+ movement, including but not limited to:

Hijacking the word 'marriage' and forcing others to use that word to describe any union between a man/man or a woman/woman; always LOUDLY and PROUDLY making sure that everybody within a 200 mile radius knows juuuuuust how sexually deviant they are; forcing women to get the ever-loving SHIT beat out of them by men during sanctioned sporting events; forcing women to shower with, and change clothes in front of, men inside of women's locker rooms; forcing genital mutilation upon children without any parental consent, and taking children away from parents who don't consent to such mutilation; ... ... ...

Lie.
Explain how having equal recognition is supremacy? Women were given the right to vote in exactly the same manner as men. Was that supremacy by women?
 
Oh, don't forget the terrible threats MAGA pedophiles are every day to young American girls as well as young boys.
MAGA isn't a person, Sybil. You seem to have an unnatural reaction to the word 'pedophile'. Maybe it's the biggest word you saw someone use and you are trying to impress someone.

I don't think you even know what it means.
 
Back
Top