Agriculture Secretary - ‘Next Step’ Is to Make ‘Everyone Reapply’ for SNAP to Ensure Integrity

Im for food help for people that need it.

but there needs to be a slight restructuring of incentives, and a healthy food direction too.

a ghetto mama with 1000$ kicks and 9 babies out of wedlock being financed to buy 20 shopping carts of froot loops is a dystopian scenario.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
did that bailout help your investmets tho?
Click to expand...
I invested in oil and land. And the land I bought had mineral rights and now has gas wells on it. My old medical practice partner was a petroleum geologist and doctor. He told me to buy land because he thought the land probably had natural gas under it in the Barnett shale and the mineral rights came with the land. My partner was right. So the answer is I don't know for sure because I did take a loan out for the land. After we completed some wells the loans were paid off. And I have parceled the land and sold a lot of it off.
 
Last edited:
Freddy Figbottom said:
Im for food help for people that need it.

but there needs to be a slight restructuring of incentives, and a healthy food direction too.

a ghetto mama with 1000$ kicks and 9 babies out of wedlock being financed to buy 20 shopping carts of froot loops is a dystopian scenario.
Click to expand...
It should only be used for food that is healthy. Fresh or frozen veggies or some canned veggies. Meats and rice and beans and flour. No highly processed foods.
 
FastLane said:
I invested in oil and land. And the land I bought had mineral rights and now has gas wells on it. My old medical practice partner was a petroleum geologist and doctor. He told me to buy land because he thought the land probably had natural gas under it and the mineral rights came with the land. My partner was right. So the answer is I don't know for sure because I did take a loan out for the land. After we completed some wells the loans were paid off. And I have parceled the land and sold a lot of it off.
Click to expand...
you're kicking ass bro.
 
FastLane said:
It should only be used for food that is healthy. Fresh or frozen veggies or some canned veggies. Meats and rice and beans and flour. No highly processed foods.
Click to expand...
at least you included meat this time.

too much carbs will have us all paying for the zombie diabetes. but big pharma likes that don't they.

the cartels are all sucking each other off.

the banker cartel.

the insurance cartel.

the food cartel.

the pharma cartel.

the defense cartel.

the tech cartel.

god bless fiat currency.

incestuous.

libertarians used to talk about fiat versus sound currency.....

now they've switched to being crypto-tards.

but's its not a secret.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
at least you included meat this time.

too much carbs will have us all paying for the zombie diabetes. but big pharma likes that don't they.

the cartels are all sucking each other off.

the banker cartel.

the insurance cartel.

the food cartel.

the pharma cartel.

the defense cartel.

the tech cartel.

god bless fiat currency.

incestuous.

libertarians used to talk about fiat versus sound currency.....

now they've switched to being crypto-tards.

but's its not a secret.
Click to expand...
This time? :cruisewhat:
 
Damocles said:
The same place that you are, against.
Click to expand...
I wish / hope that's true.

but it seems most are fine with it and still like to applaud their own purity.

when of course, my purity is supreme.

I'm aware my obnoxious self-rightousness.

yes. i poop in the punch bowl.

yes I'm the reason we can't have nice things.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
SNAP should only apply to rice, ww flour, rolled oats, bananas, and canned veggies. Cheap healthy food. $100 per month per adult. $50 for kids under 12.

www.breitbart.com

Rollins: 'Next Step' Is to Make 'Everyone Reapply' for SNAP to Ensure Integrity

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins says data from blue states is "going to give us a platform and a trajectory to fundamentally rebuild this program, have everyone reapply for their benefit, make sure that... they literally are vulnerable and they can't survive without it." | Clips
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
Click to expand...

What shocked me about this is that it isn't an annual thing?

Are you kidding me, people went decades without the need to supply new information?
 
Taichiliberal said:
Hmm, ass-backwards bureaucracy to address the willfully ignorant prejudices of the maga mooks and alt-right reich mooks.

First off, Rollins is a die-in-the-wool hard right, legal pedigreed Texan republican and Trump appointee. Her current position has already displayed her willingness to twist facts to fit the MAGA propaganda. Note:

Undocumented immigrants remain ineligible for federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits in 2025, but specific immigrant categories and documented noncitizens retain eligibility, and states can offer separate, state‑funded assistance. Recent legislative proposals and administrative guidance have narrowed or clarified eligibility for some documented immigrant groups, producing local impacts and policy debates.
  • Claim: Democrats are "putting free health care for illegal aliens... ahead of food security for American families".
    • Fact Check: PolitiFact rated this claim as inaccurate. The 2025 government shutdown stemmed from a disagreement over extending Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies as part of continued federal funding. The statement falsely framed the debate as "free health care for illegal aliens" and incorrectly assigned blame for the SNAP funding lapse, which was a result of the overall funding disagreement, not a specific Democratic agenda item to prioritize non-citizens over SNAP recipients.
And remember the BS the Trump administration tried to sell when they were using kids getting food as leverage along with the gov't shutdown?

  • Claim: The USDA cannot use an existing contingency fund to continue SNAP benefits during the government shutdown.
    • Fact Check: This claim was disputed by various sources, including legal experts and advocacy groups. While Secretary Rollins stated there weren't "just pots of $9.2 billion sitting around" and claimed a lack of legal authority to transfer funds, past administrations had used such funds during previous shutdowns. States' attorneys general even filed lawsuits to access the contingency fund, arguing it was available for regular SNAP benefits.
Click to expand...

I see you drones were programmed by the hive to bleat your hating points.

BUT see if you can explain why people showing they NEED food assistance in order to get it is a bad thing? Why should we NOT verify this at least yearly with a new application?
 
Jake Starkey said:
I don't think "purposefully" happens all that much, and, no, it is not a sign of a lack of intelligence, it's often merely a sign or signal at the discussion about a system that has never been workable. Look at Somalia or southern Sudan.
Click to expand...
Neither of those are libertarian, anarchy fails as a system of government, but only socialists call for it, not libertarians. Purposefully "misunderstanding" is definitely a sign of low intelligence. If you cannot actually tell us why you hate it without first showing you actually understand the philosophy you are admitting that you are not intelligent enough to use information in an argument.
 
Damocles said:
Neither of those are libertarian, anarchy fails as a system of government, but only socialists call for it, not libertarians. Purposefully "misunderstanding" is definitely a sign of low intelligence. If you cannot actually tell us why you hate it without first showing you actually understand the philosophy you are admitting that you are not intelligent enough to use information in an argument.
Click to expand...
They will do until we get a libertarian state.
 
FastLane said:
That is exactly what needs to happen :thumbsupgirl:
Click to expand...

Every single year.

I had no idea that it wasn't already this way. What kind of shit is it that someone can get food stamps in 1990 and still be on them in 2025 without ever needing to reapply?

It's fucking insane - but watch the Hamas democrats defend it.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
I wish / hope that's true.

but it seems most are fine with it and still like to applaud their own purity.

when of course, my purity is supreme.

I'm aware my obnoxious self-rightousness.

yes. i poop in the punch bowl.

yes I'm the reason we can't have nice things.
Click to expand...
You are mistaken. You just tell people that they "are fine with this" and ignore what they say. Libertarianism as a whole is against government propping up what should be a private business. If libertarians were in charge, the initial creation of the bifurcated "bank system" that is a fascistic conglomeration of private and government organizations, would never have happened. Saying they are "anarchist" is also a lie. Calling collapsed government systems (usually collapsed from socialistic or another totalitarian system) "libertarian" is also a lie and fails to show any understanding of what libertarians believe, want, or even how they act.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top