T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Yes. They are more likely to have more voter fraud. They have more voters and people as a rule. They practice things in how voting occurs that can be shown to increase the ease and propensity of voter fraud being committed. We don't know what the overall rate of fraud actually is.Just re-posting your original claim, and bolding it.
The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map
The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map is an interactive tool providing a sampling of proven instances of election fraud across the U.S. From @HeritageDataviz
Voter fraud in US elections? What the data and research shows
The Heritage Foundation found that voter fraud has occurred but in very small numbers.
How widespread is election fraud in the United States? Not very | Brookings
In swing states, reported cases of voter fraud amounts to less than 1%.
This article shows the problem with current analyses quite well, if not what they were aiming for
A Data-Driven Analysis Of Voter Fraud Claims
Explore the truth behind voter fraud claims with real data. This analysis breaks down common myths, compares fraud rates, and reveals why restrictive voting laws often do more harm than good.
perthirtysix.com
Here's one small example of why:
1.5% of all absentee/mail-in ballots were rejected in 2022 - Ballotpedia News
news.ballotpedia.org
As a hypothetical, let's say state A sets the rate for matching signatures on a mail in ballot at having to be 80% of what the on-file signature looks like. State B sets their rate at If the ballot is signed, it's valid. What would be the rejection rate of those two states for signature mismatch? Would a serious mismatch in signatures between the file and one on the ballot indicate it could be fraudulent?
