Agriculture Secretary - ‘Next Step’ Is to Make ‘Everyone Reapply’ for SNAP to Ensure Integrity

So if your 9 to 5 doesn't pay enough to cover rent and food, and you have no ACA for medical costs, like say the Walmart employee situation in recent years, and you have to supplement with SNAP, you right to vote should be rescinded?
They've got the money for rent and food and as for med costs ---- STAY AWAY FROM DOCTORS. Snappers are frauds.
 
Uhh, apparently, the O.P. and whoever he's quoting are too dumb to know that you reapply for most benefits each year when they take your evaluation to see if you still qualify.
No they dont you idiot. Some states mandate that but the laws are not enforced just like the laws against illegals.
Blacks and illegals get their freebies automatically for decades without doing anything. THINk, you miserable degenerate.
 
Oh yes you are. Otherwise you wouldn't dismiss it as a "few grand".
:palm: Over the years, I've been trying to teach you right wing wonks 2 things: That you need a refresher course in reading carefully and comprehensively, and that you can't lie about what others post to a reading audience that has a better than G.E.D in English composition.

So, once more for the cheap seats:


From Post #12: He's talking about eliminating waste and fraud. Thing is, the corporate elite and inherited wealthy are okay with military/industrial, big pharma fraud, but shit their pants that somewhere a joker has scammed the system for a few grand. And then they take a scorched earth approach to all social services, while the Pentagon fails audits for 7 years, and billions are dumped into Israel, whose citizens enjoy social services and entitlements that the average working stiff in America can only dream of.

Prior to that see Post #9. After that, only an insipidly stubborn MAGA hack would double down on his revisionist clap trap, as I'm sure you will. I don't expect you to ever admit error or concede a point. I just expose your foolishness to the objective reader. Carry on.
 
You shouldn't take something stated in a conversation about government being problematic (pushing regulations that caused a collapse) and assume it is the only thing I have ever said. You are literally purposefully ignoring what was stated so you can build that strawman. You must believe that your arguments are weak if you can only argue against the strawman you create and to do it you must remain purposefully ignorant. Ignorance is not a virtue.
who forced banks to resell loans they knew were bad at a triple a rating?
 
:palm: Over the years, I've been trying to teach you right wing wonks 2 things: That you need a refresher course in reading carefully and comprehensively, and that you can't lie about what others post to a reading audience that has a better than G.E.D in English composition.

So, once more for the cheap seats:


From Post #12: He's talking about eliminating waste and fraud. Thing is, the corporate elite and inherited wealthy are okay with military/industrial, big pharma fraud, but shit their pants that somewhere a joker has scammed the system for a few grand. And then they take a scorched earth approach to all social services, while the Pentagon fails audits for 7 years, and billions are dumped into Israel, whose citizens enjoy social services and entitlements that the average working stiff in America can only dream of.

Prior to that see Post #9. After that, only an insipidly stubborn MAGA hack would double down on his revisionist clap trap, as I'm sure you will. I don't expect you to ever admit error or concede a point. I just expose your foolishness to the objective reader. Carry on.
you're correct on all this, but Dems aren't better.

and when you became globalists you abandoned all goodness.
 
You can't handle it, little guy

:creepy:

Oh look, it's the little retarded Stuckey boi - or is that starkey? You know, the one who plays in his own feces.

Here little retard, try and learn something;

{Spearheading this endeavor was one of the leading progressives in Congress, Henry Reuss—an anti-war, pro-McGovern Democrat and chairman of the House Banking Committee—who sponsored the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977. Title VIII of this bill, known as the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), “required each appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency to assess … [each] bank’s record of helping to meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.” This was a mandate for banks to make special efforts to seek out and lend to minority borrowers—particularly mortgagors—of meager to modest means. The bill was ultimately passed with near-unanimous Democratic support and was signed into law by Democrat President Jimmy Carter in 1977.}

 
Jimmy Carter initially. Bill Clinton doubled down.
I'm talking about 2008, and the housing bubble.

the housing bubble was created by textbook fascism, collusion between government and corporations to make a bubble, pop it, then privative profits and socialize losses.

libertarians rcan only blame one side and are corporate/ banker cocksuckers.

big government is only bad when it's time for food for the needy according to libertarians.
 
Back
Top