It wasn't "suspicion." The police had a warrant for his arrest. They were serving said warrant. He could surrender, which he didn't. At that point, the police have a duty to forcibly take him into custody because they have a warrant for his arrest!
he doesn't believe the warrant story, because they wanted him to step outside, and says I am crazy to claim that is for safety reasons.
No, Shitforbrains is arguing that the police didn't have probable cause or something from the tone of his, her, its, posts and keeps babbling about "the Constitution." STY sounds like one of those sovereign citizen / conspiracy nutters that does this sort of thing with police when stopped for having no license plate, or a homemade one and then wonders why the police shot him when he refused to cooperate in the least and was then put under arrest and he started fighting the cops.
That's exactly what they wanted. It also gave them space to control him and cuff him up for transport. They couldn't very well do that when he's wedged in the doorway.
you quoted anonymouse though - who sided with the cops here
It is true, and thank you for clarifying why.
I support and tend to side with cops. I tend to give them credit for their training and experience. They are nowhere as abusive as Democrats claim.
A damn fine way to get yourself killed.
the media says they had a warrant. Yet, they kept having to try to coax him outside. This shows that they did not have a warrant, because if they actually had a warrant, they would not have waited, they would have just grabbed him. They would also be tripping over themselves to post this warrant publicly to show that they did everything right. Therefore, the cops entered illegally and the dr should have been well within his rights to resist with lethal force.
I hear what you're saying. The reason this case law is both relevant and highly important is that it actually restricts the government, not the citizen.
I have to disagree with this myth. Most cops are only trained to the extent of qualifying twice a year. I am more highly trained than any cop since i'm a Marine who regularly attends tactical training with both my AR and handgun
Gave you a 'wow' for breaking the radical libtard stupidity meter. I’m genuinely curious, were you dropped on your head as a baby, or did your parents just straight-up forget you existed? I’m conducting a very serious scientific survey to finally solve the mystery: how do you drones become amoral, zero-critical-thinking, rage-fueled NPCs? Check every box that applies, champ (be honest, it's for science):
well, you first need to break out of your own idiocy about liberals and conservatives.......especially when you moronically don't bother to check the history of a poster. I'm not a liberal or a conservative. I am, however, a hater of all government overreach, especially when it comes to the lack of accountability of police. So, my question for you, in order for your so called survey to mean anything, is do you approve of every single law enforcement action? if so, why?
No, it doesn't. What were they supposed to do, just tackle the guy the second he opened the door? They tied to get his cooperation, he refused. Then dorks, like you, would be screaming about police brutality. They handled it just like they should. The problem was Landin.
So? They don't need one to make an arrest.
The interesting thing about self defense:
Sorry bud, you’re a libtard to me, full stop. Call yourself whatever bullshit you want, it’s a free country and I get to tag you exactly like I see you. That’s how it works, dumbass.
Okay. It is obvious you have never read the 4th amendment, which does not discuss arrests at all.
