Yakuda
Verified User
Wow! It's a little early to be doing crack my friend.My apologies. I thought it was a question.
Who claimed that?
Wow! It's a little early to be doing crack my friend.My apologies. I thought it was a question.
Who claimed that?
You made the claim that certain posters/people called what Trump said is an act of sedition/insurrection.Wow! It's a little early to be doing crack my friend.
The difference is that the insurrection ACTUALLY happened. And Trump was impeached for it.You can't even follow a fuckig conversation. I'll type slowly for you, if trump was guilty of inciting insurrection with his words then these six donkey jizz guzzling pigs are guilty of sedition with theirs
So you're claiming no on this site said trump was guilty of insurrection?You made the claim that certain posters/people called what Trump said is an act of sedition/insurrection.
Name them.
So trump incited an ACTUAL insurrection and the only punishment was being impeached by a democrat controlled house? LmfaoThe difference is that the insurrection ACTUALLY happened. And Trump was impeached for it.
The others merely warned that it is permissible to disobey illegal orders, which it is.
Your question was specific. The answer is obviously no.So you're claiming no on this site said trump was guilty of insurrection?
Yeah, too bad the MAGATS in the Senate are traitors to the Constitution. McConnell made a public statement about Trump’s guilt, which was as obvious as his guilt regarding the Zelinsky strongarm, but caved when it came time to vote.So trump incited an ACTUAL insurrection and the only punishment was being impeached by a democrat controlled house? Lmfao
No encouraged them to protest peacefully and patriotically. Its not my fault you're a hysterical KarenYour question was specific. The answer is obviously no.
Now as to him being guilty, yes he was guilty as he has lied about the election and encouraged his supporters to fight.
Then he should have been brought to a court of law and charged criminally.Yeah, too bad the MAGATS in the Senate are traitors to the Constitution. McConnell made a public statement about Trump’s guilt, which was as obvious as his guilt regarding the Zelinsky strongarm, but caved when it came time to vote.
You really are the Stupidest Motherfucker on the Forum. A well-deserved title. You earn it every day.Then he should have been brought to a court of law and charged criminally.
Sure. J6 never happened. The Capitol was never stormed. Nobody was attacked and killed.No encouraged them to protest peacefully and patriotically. Its not my fault you're a hysterical Karen
That's your usual drivel when you no longer have anything useful to add. Insurrection is a criminal offense dumbass. If he was guilty like you claim why weren't criminal.chargez filed against him? Just answer the question. Oh that's right you can't.You really are the Stupidest Motherfucker on the Forum. A well-deserved title. You earn it every day.
I’m sure the Biden DOJ considered it, but didn’t feel it was worth the effort, politically and otherwise , to proceed. The optics would suck, appearing to be a political vendetta.That's your usual drivel when you no longer have anything useful to add. Insurrection is a criminal offense dumbass. If he was guilty like you claim why weren't criminal.chargez filed against him? Just answer the question. Oh that's right you can't.
Really? It's not worth the effort to charge an insurrectionist with insurrection? So just because it might look bad for democrats they didn't do it even though they had clear evidenced of his crime?I’m sure the Biden DOJ considered it, but didn’t feel it was worth the effort, politically and otherwise , to proceed. The optics would suck, appearing to be a political vendetta.
That’s in contrast to Trump, who charges right in with his personal attorney for his revenge tour.
Yeah, stupid fuck. Unlike Trump needing his personal attorney to do his bidding, professional prosecutors actually consider things like that.Really? It's not worth the effort to charge an insurrectionist with insurrection? So just because it might look bad for democrats they didn't do it even though they had clear evidenced of his crime?
Oh so he committed a crime and you twats ignored it because it would look like political vengeance. Things that make you go hmmmmm.Yeah, stupid fuck. Unlike Trump needing his personal attorney to do his bidding, professional prosecutors actually consider things like that.
Smith decided against pursuing it, in part because of the myriad of other charges pending.Oh so he committed a crime and you twats ignored it because it would look like political vengeance. Things that make you go hmmmmm.
And yet he's still a free a man. So in other words you retarded donkey jizz guzzlers let trump get away with his supposed numerous crimes. Good jobSmith decided against pursuing it, in part because of the myriad of other charges pending.
“So Smith declined to pursue the charge, given the potential legal challenges in doing so, as well as what he called “the other powerful charges available.” Trump was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights. He pleaded not guilty.”
You continue to prove your title is warranted.
LIF. Grow up.Tobytone has lost it.
Trump declared unequivocably that what the six democratic legislators said was "insurrection" which was punishable by death.
We know what Piggy Trump, and we know how to deal with it.