If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

How do you know? Did he ever say that?
Trump never goes to church and never associates with religious people unless it's for partisan political advantage.

You judge people by their actions, not their words, just like I do.

You call Trump a fascist even though he has never called himself that.
 
ftfy. That's your opinion.

The Vikings, the Nazis, the Mongols would pillage and maraud their way across Eurasia assaulting old people and taking their money and land. They saw a real benefit to themselves in assaulting total strangers and taking their resources.

What higher standard are you pointing at to say your opinion is objectively the right one? And that it's not just your opinion or cultural convention.

You really are as morally repugnant as a Bible Thumper. You think morality comes from a giant invisible man in the sky. You don't actually know that hitting an old lady is bad, but God told you it was so it must be.

That's pathetic and sick.

Yet you sit in judgement of people who don't need a sky-daddy to tell them punching old ladies is bad.

Wow. I'm GLAD to be judged by scuzz like you.
 
ftfy....That's your deal. Most educated and well read people have heard of western civilization's most seminal playwrights.

LOL. I've heard of Sophoclese and read Sophoclese. I'm so sorry you think you are the only person with an education.

Perhaps if you were actually a fraction as smart as you think you are you'd realize you aren't always the smartest man in the room. ;)

But if it makes you feel "superior" then by all means. Have at it little one.
 
😡 You really are as morally repugnant as a Bible Thumper!!:cuss: :village:
ftfy. Nothing of what you wrote explains why assaulting people and stealing their property is objectively bad or evil - independent of opinion or cultural convention.

The Viking, Mongol, and Hun societies felt like they benefited greatly from taking the resources of strangers. A 'might makes right' cultural ethos has been practiced by human societies far more frequently than a charitable universal-love ethos.

What you're doing is trying to smuggle in a religious ethos to your personal zeitgeist.

It would be far more honest to say you are a moral relativist. There's nothing inherently wrong with admitting that. Lots of people believe in moral relativism.
 
I'm so fucking angry that you mentioned Sophocles and the great playwrights of Greek tragedy! It's inconceivable you knew them unless you googled them!:cuss:
ftfy. I have a lasting interest in the ancient Greeks and know quite a lot about them. I did the hard work of reading books and articles and listening to lecture series about classical Greece. That shouldn't make you angry.

But even a well read college graduate should be basically aware of the seminal playwrights of Greek tragedy. It's part of the West's educated lexicon.
 

Stop "fixing" my posts, clown.



Nothing of what you wrote explains why assaulting people and stealing their property is objectively bad or evil - independent of opinion or cultural convention.

I already explained it to you such that a brain damaged child could understand. Maybe you need to hit up Google AI to explain evolution of social animals to you.

Does your invisible sky daddy tell you that being willfully ignorant is a "virtue"? You sure do seem to be doing that.
 
ftfy. I have a lasting interest in the ancient Greeks and know quite a lot about them. I did the hard work of reading books and articles and listening to lecture series about classical Greece. That shouldn't make you angry.

But even a well read college graduate should be basically aware of the seminal playwrights of Greek tragedy. It's part of the West's educated lexicon.

Ohjesus....someone got pissed that others have read Greek plays. OMG. OMG. CYPRESS MAY NOT BE A GOD!

Jeez Dr. Google, Give it a rest.
 
Who the fuck is Aeschylus and Euripides? Give it a rest! :cuss:
ftfy. You're the one who got agitated and belligerent when I mentioned the seminal Greek playwrights. And I wasn't even talking to you.
I was explaining to Yakuda that the Bible may not be history's greatest literature about the human condition. An argument can be made for Shakespeare, Aeschylus, or Sophocles.
 
Your level of knowledge about history and religion fucking pisses me off!:village:
ftfy. You are literally the only poster on this board who would have gotten agitated that I mentioned the seminal Greek playwrights when I was specifically discussing literature with another poster.

Rather than stewing in resentment about my posts, you too can wean yourself off Google search, and commit yourself to the hard work of reading books and listening to audio lectures.
 
ftfy. Nothing of what you wrote explains why assaulting people and stealing their property is objectively bad or evil - independent of opinion or cultural convention.

The Viking, Mongol, and Hun societies felt like they benefited greatly from taking the resources of strangers. A 'might makes right' cultural ethos has been practiced by human societies far more frequently than a charitable universal-love ethos.

What you're doing is trying to smuggle in a religious ethos to your personal zeitgeist.

It would be far more honest to say you are a moral relativist. There's nothing inherently wrong with admitting that. Lots of people believe in moral relativism.
When the Commandments read “Thou shalt not kill, steal, lie,” etc. they merely mean you don’t do it within the tribe.

Man figured out long ago, way before commandments, that to maintain order and cohesion within the tribe, certain behaviors were frowned upon. Lying, stealing and killing were among those.
 
ftfy. You are literally the only poster on this board who would have gotten agitated that I mentioned the seminal Greek playwrights

Because you had to GOOGLE IT. And all you do is blast people for googling.

You need proof you google?
please write in your own words, without using an AI copy/paste as a crutch

And here we go....you can click on any one of them to see the full context. You frantically google more than I eat hot food.

Google AI

Google AI

-Google AI

Google AI

Google AI is saying

- Google AI

- Google AI

Google AI

Google AI claims

Google AI

Google AI summary

This is what Google AI says

According to Google AI,

Google AI.

According to Google AI,

Google AI:


Google AI


Google AI[/I]

According to Google AI,

Google AI

According to Google AI

Google AI has the same interpretation of "wetness" that I had, despite Perry's attempt to link it to some jargon from a chemistry textbook.

Google AI:


data source: Google AI
 
When the Commandments read “Thou shalt not kill, steal, lie,” etc. they merely mean you don’t do it within the tribe.

Man figured out long ago, way before commandments, that to maintain order and cohesion within the tribe, certain behaviors were frowned upon. Lying, stealing and killing were among those.

People like Cypress can ONLY understand what is good or bad when someone in authority TELLS them. Truly sad and kinda sick. I feel sorry for people like that.
 
HEy! @Cypress I know you are OBSESSED with "Reaction Scores" (want proof? Here you go:

That is a really low reaction score for somebody who has been posting for a while.

You have a remarkably low reaction score

There's a few posters here with negative reaction scores, but Perry PhD's reaction score is so low, he's basically swirling the bottom of the toilet bowl with them


I have just recently figured out your buddy Doc Dutch is busy marking "negative" reactions to every one of my posts. That lowers my reaction score. So maybe I can use Doc's approach to lower YOURS.

Would you like that? I can see to it that you wind up with a very low score. I'm dedicated to my projects. :)

Let me know.
 
Who the fuck is Sophocles and Aeschylus???
ftfy. You're literally the only person in the history of JPP to butt into the conversation of two other posters and get agitated because one of them mentioned the Greek playwrights.
I frantically google more than I eat hot food. :bleh:
ftfy. Not only that, but you plagiarize without citation.

I have never said I don't ever use Google for source citations. Out of my 70k posts, you found 15 examples, and they are almost always because I'm providing an independent unbiased source to posters who won't believe what I state, or to kick off a thread topic with an independent description of the subject.
 
When the Commandments read “Thou shalt not kill, steal, lie,” etc. they merely mean you don’t do it within the tribe.
Read the sermon on the mount. Jesus reinterpreted and expanded Torah to include a prohibition on hating or abusing even enemies or rivals.
Man figured out long ago, way before commandments, that to maintain order and cohesion within the tribe, certain behaviors were frowned upon. Lying, stealing and killing were among those.
Almost nobody on this board practices the Golden Rule. You can't be on this board for 30 minutes without being cussed at, demeaned, insulted.

That obviously means the Golden rule does not come naturally or easily to humans.

Adultery, theft, lying are routine in all human societies. It is only curbed by law enforcement or social sanction.

The distinction is that our conscience frequently tells us what we ought to do, but we choose to do what make us happy or feel good instead.
 
Are you really so stupid as to think this some sorta "gotcha" for Atheists? Like we can't find anything bad?

God damn the depth of your ignorance is astonishing.

I don't believe in God but I think punching an old lady in the face is bad. And you know why? UNLIKE YOU I don't have to have God tell me it's bad. IT's bad because it makes society less safe overall. If old ladies (among the least physically capable in our society) can be brutalized at will without any oprobrium then it makes it bad for EVERYONE.

Why are you too dense to understand this SIMPLE point?
Why is punching an old lady in the face bad?
 
Back
Top