Its fascinating watching media and Democrat handwringing when Trump asks his DOJ to investigate Democrats in the Epstein matter

IBDaMann said:
I don't think Obama was one of the Epstein vacationers, although Bill Clinton was, and I think that we know that Bill was looking for any excuse to escape from Hillary.
Click to expand...
Lets do this, after the full reveal is out, lets meet up here and you agree that once again the Tiger was right...they've somehow manage to put Obama on that island showing off his goods to a teen mop...I don't put anything past Trump and Bondi, nada, not a damn thing.
 
archives said:
Why dig into that which was closed when Trump was already legitimately being investigated for 1/6 and stealing top secret documents.
Click to expand...
Why not reexamine the evidence, especially when Trump was embroiled in illegitimate. tyrannical lawfare?

archives said:
And, as you keep ignoring, the Epstein conspiracies were all MAGA, born and echoed on the right,
Click to expand...
As you keep ignoring, Democrats, nationwide, suddenly began screeching and hollering, on cue, on command from the DNC high command, for Trump to produce a non-existent hoax, just so they could scream "cover-up" when the nonexistent hoax was not produced.

As you keep ignoring, if this had been anything more than just a hoax, the Democrats would have exploited the shit out it against Trump's campaign prior to the election.

archives said:
why did you think Kash, Bono, Learner, Greene, and others were upset when Bondi said there was nothing significant there to release,
Click to expand...
Why do you think Kash, Bono, Learner, Greene, and others totally understood when Bondi announced that the "Epstein File" was a hoax?

What Congress approved was not the release of any nonexistent hoax; they approved the release of previously unreleased records involving Epstein, which is something totally different. duh.
 
tigerred59 said:
Lets do this, after the full reveal is out, lets meet up here
Click to expand...
Absolutely. Remember that I don't claim to know anything other than what I know, which is not the complete picture, admittedly.

tigerred59 said:
and you agree that once again the Tiger was right...they've somehow manage to put Obama on that island showing off his goods to a teen mop...
Click to expand...
Sure, you bet, especially if Obama is placed on Epstein's island around September 11-12, 2012 while Benghazi was happening (explaining why he was completely unavailable to be reached). If that turns out to be the case, I will openly admit that you were right.

tigerred59 said:
I don't put anything past Trump and Bondi, nada, not a damn thing.
Click to expand...
I don't know what that means exactly in this case, but Bondi has it under control, and Trump is going to ensure it isn't swept under the rug.
 
I am increasingly thinking that Trump is a tool of the oligarchs, promoting the scam that there is any significant difference between the D's and the R's where the rubber meets the road.....of who is in charge and that the masses are to be enslaved.
 
The ignorance/insanity of current times has likely never been seen before.....at all times before this people who failed this profoundly died off before they got this bad.
 
Into the Night said:
So...no answer. No more than I expected from you.
Click to expand...
" So...no answer. No more than I expected from you". YEP LOL.
You have said this over a hundred times " DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!" and when asked to show us where I have ever denied making any of the posts I made you can't.
YEP " .no answer. No more than I expected from you."
Why don't you just go away and only come back when you can finally show us a post of mine I have denied?
 
Tbird19482 said:
IF HE IS IN THOSE PAPERS HE SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED .
Click to expand...
Hold on a moment. One should be investigated if one is suspected of having committed a crime, not if he happens to appear in papers. Can you imagine a judge being asked to determine probable cause on the basis that the accused isn't an accused, just that he "appeared in papers" and that the DA never accused him of anything.

Oh, it is unconstitutional to investigate someone for anything without articulable justification for believing that a crime was committed. If you are demanding that someone be investigated, you have to back that up with your articulable justification of the crime that was committed and why you believe the person you are accusing of having committed that crime ... otherwise there can be no investigation.

Tbird19482 said:
I never said he committed a crime you stupid fuck.
Click to expand...
Then guess what. You aren't calling for any investigation.
 
IBDaMann said:
Hold on a moment. One should be investigated if one is suspected of having committed a crime, not if he happens to appear in papers. Can you imagine a judge being asked to determine probable cause on the basis that the accused isn't an accused, just that he "appeared in papers" and that the DA never accused him of anything.

Oh, it is unconstitutional to investigate someone for anything without articulable justification for believing that a crime was committed. If you are demanding that someone be investigated, you have to back that up with your articulable justification of the crime that was committed and why you believe the person you are accusing of having committed that crime ... otherwise there can be no investigation.


Then guess what. You aren't calling for any investigation.
Click to expand...
Aren't the people who's names are in those papers suspected of committing a crime?
 
Tbird19482 said:
Aren't the people who's names are in those papers suspected of committing a crime?
Click to expand...
First, there are no "papers." The whole concept of "The Epstein File" was a hoax. If you never got the memo, I'm telling you now.

Second, the answer is "no." Names appearing in the records that were released are just names in records; the records have to be analyzed for context. The DNC pushed the hoax just to get Trump's name "associated" with "pedophilia", as a smear, not that anyone has ever specifically accused Trump of any crime. Many have shouted "Trump is GUILTY!" ... but never of what.

Jeffrey Epstein serviced high-profile Democrats. High-profile Democrats are the only ones who were serviced by Epstein on his island. Trump is not in that picture. Trump refused to associate with Epstein because of Epstein's behavior, so it won't be possible to tie Trump to any crimes. Other high-profile Democrats, on the other hand, will be coming out in the wash, per the insistence of Democrats in Congress. Yay! Go Team!
 
IBDaMann said:
First, there are no "papers." The whole concept of "The Epstein File" was a hoax. If you never got the memo, I'm telling you now.

Second, the answer is "no." Names appearing in the records that were released are just names in records; the records have to be analyzed for context. The DNC pushed the hoax just to get Trump's name "associated" with "pedophilia", as a smear, not that anyone has ever specifically accused Trump of any crime. Many have shouted "Trump is GUILTY!" ... but never of what.

Jeffrey Epstein serviced high-profile Democrats. High-profile Democrats are the only ones who were serviced by Epstein on his island. Trump is not in that picture. Trump refused to associate with Epstein because of Epstein's behavior, so it won't be possible to tie Trump to any crimes. Other high-profile Democrats, on the other hand, will be coming out in the wash, per the insistence of Democrats in Congress. Yay! Go Team!
Click to expand...
If you say so, Keep your head up Trumps ass .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top