Hegseth issues an illegal order.

Of course. Who would expect Whiskey Pete to actually do his own dirty work. The officer who gave the order is guilty of a war crime, but so is the Secretary of War who gave the order regardless if he actually pushed the button or not.
:lolup: Unhinged mental case loves to make his stupid shit up as he goes. :laugh:
this-is-it-this-is-for-real.gif

haha.gif
 
Are you cool with what they did?

Is it not clear why the Congressmen reminded the troops about their responsibility?
I don't know if they did what they are saying they did. As I always do, always... even with Democrats, I will wait for information before addressing "what they have done"... At this point all I see are anonymous people saying things, that is not evidence of anything.

Personally I don't even like blowing up the boats to begin with, if you know where they are and where they are going then arrest them when they get there. It will still deter them, without just blowing up boats because you suspect there are drugs on it.
 
Then what the fuck did you mean by this?

"...would rather be popular than do the right thing."
First thats not the point for engaging with this thread.

What that means dumbass is that to many Republicans go along with leftist stupidity b cause they want people to like them. More often than not the right thing to do with leftists is to tell them to go fuck themselves but that's separate from whether they should investigate or not. Now if you didn't spend so much time suckling the crack pipe like your mamas tit youd be able to understand better what I was writing about
 
Last edited:
I think we'll know soon enough. I think it is more likely they will "find" that he didn't order what they are saying he ordered.
Why would any officer violate the law if not given an order to do so? Implied or directly?

While the officer who gave the order will certainly be the first on trial, it will lead up the chain of command to whoever originated the order to "kill them all" to eliminate witnesses.

No doubt this is directly related to the fact two survivors had been previously recovered and the heat that came down on Trump for sending them to their home countries instead of bringing them in for trial...which is SOP.
 
First thats not the point for engaging with this thread.

What that means dumbass is that to many Republicans go along with leftist stupidity b cause they want people to like them. More often than not the right thing to do with leftists is to tell them to go fuck themselves but that's separate from whether they should investigate or not. Now if you didn't spend so much time suckling the crack pipe like your mamas tit youd be able to insert better what I was writing about
Then you were merely expressing an irrelevant opinion about Republicans in general.
 
Perhaps....BUT.....is this going to be IT???!!!
haha.gif
Nah, I think that is why they will do hearings pre mid term, so they can more input into the outcome. Congressional hearings are partisan mockeries of actual hearings. If the Dems are in control they will "find" what they want to find, vice versa for the Rs.
 
I don't know if they did what they are saying they did.

Personally I don't even like blowing up the boats to begin with, if you know where they are and where they are going then arrest them when they get there. It will still deter them, without just blowing up boats because you suspect there are drugs on it.
I agree with your second paragraph, but you did not address the question, I guess it was to braud.

What are your thoughts on Hegseth issuing that order, (if he did), and the military men or women carrying it out?

If Hegseth issued an order to kill everyone, even after the boat was destroyed, was that illegal?
 
Are you suggesting that the report was made up? What thing? The report and the alleged war crime, dumbass. :palm: Go read the thread again. That is if you can.
Are you suggesting that it is actually a report filled with anonymous sources, innuendo and hyperbole?

Can you provide a copy of the "report"? Where did it come from? What is in it? Who are the sources?
 
Why would any officer violate the law if not given an order to do so? Implied or directly?

While the officer who gave the order will certainly be the first on trial, it will lead up the chain of command to whoever originated the order to "kill them all" to eliminate witnesses.

No doubt this is directly related to the fact two survivors had been previously recovered and the heat that came down on Trump for sending them to their home countries instead of bringing them in for trial...which is SOP.
I do not know if they did violate the law. This is what I have stated. anonymous reports that get Democrats excited about "getting Trump" have never been reliable in the past. Do you never learn from history? Wait for information, stop predicting the doom of Donald Trump prematurely, take some time to really satisfy....

East a snickers, you turn into a troll when you're hungry.
 
I agree with your second paragraph, but you did not address the question, I guess it was to braud.

What are your thoughts on Hegseth issuing that order, (if he did), and the military men or women carrying it out?

If Hegseth issued an order to kill everyone, even after the boat was destroyed, was that illegal?
I did address the question. You asked, "Are you okay with what they did?" and I responded "I do not know if they did what these folks are saying they have done."

It addresses the question. It is specific, and tells you what I think.
 
Back
Top