Hegseth issues an illegal order.

Still not comprehending my point. If you think it was wrong of Obama to do that, then you also agree that it was wrong of Hegseth to order the killings of survivors.

Then investigate him for all I care. If he committed war crimes, he should answer for that, just like Bush.
Did the MAGAt cracker retard use whataboutism to justify murder on the high seas with Obama using drone strikes on terrorists living in hostile countries and fomenting attacks on Americans?

If so, it's expected from these MAGAt cracker retards. They condemned Obama for killing known terrorists yet support their Orange Jesus in murdering boaters on the high seas without evidence they are a danger to Americans.

Anyone who thinks Anwar Al-Awlaki wasn't a terrorist and bent on encouraging Jihadists to murder Americans really is a fucking moron.
 
"Looks" like he did. My doubt is irrelevant. He either did it or he didn't. You have no absolute proof he did.

My position is quite simple asshole when you find he actually did it bring him up on charges and give him whatever punishment is for that crime. Until then this is nothing but a leftist fevered dream because you don't actually give a shit if he did it or not because you'll be onto the next thing that "looks" like something wrong. You leftists are like 4 year old boys off their ADHD meds that your parents put you because you don't ever shut the fuck up
I certainty can understand why you do not want to share your position. Run, keep running.
 
Did the MAGAt cracker retard use whataboutism to justify murder on the high seas with Obama using drone strikes on terrorists living in hostile countries and fomenting attacks on Americans?

If so, it's expected from these MAGAt cracker retards. They condemned Obama for killing known terrorists yet support their Orange Jesus in murdering boaters on the high seas without evidence they are a danger to Americans.

Anyone who thinks Anwar Al-Awlaki wasn't a terrorist and bent on encouraging Jihadists to murder Americans really is a fucking moron.
He so did.
 
I'm not sure why you idiots are trying to argue what is and isn't lawful these days. You've allowed the federal government to blur that line so much, with the PATRIOT ACT, NDAA, etc. that all you're really doing now is playing the game of muddy waters to fight each other instead of forcing the government to adhere to it's constitutional limitations.
 
I
The Coast Guard and the Navy both have boats that run just as quickly as those. Your argument is absurd, nobody would use an Aircraft Carrier to chase down those boats.

I get that you get some satisfaction from the boats blowing up, but it is not necessary to get that job done and we can and should do better than just blowing them up summarily. No crime deserves the death penalty without adjudication.
You are conflating a legal matter to terrorism. The president has designated Narco-terrorists as “terrorists.”

This changes the rules. We didn’t take ISIS to court. We killed them.

We didn’t try Osama in court, we killed him.

Innocent lives in America are being saved, many of them children, every time we bomb a boat that has been determined to be carrying illegal drugs.
 
I

You are conflating a legal matter to terrorism. The president has designated Narco-terrorists as “terrorists.”

This changes the rules. We didn’t take ISIS to court. We killed them.

We didn’t try Osama in court, we killed him.

Innocent lives in America are being saved, many of them children, every time we bomb a boat that has been determined to be carrying illegal drugs.
In the scenario discussed, the boat was disabled. These people were killed as they held onto the wreckage. There was 0 danger any drugs would get delivered anwyere.
 
In the scenario discussed, the boat was disabled. These people were killed as they held onto the wreckage. There was 0 danger any drugs would get delivered anwyere.
They were Narco-terrorists, we kill terrorists.

Your support for Narco-terrorists is duly noted,

You far left loons are nutters.
 
Back
Top