Are you the type of person who would execute wounded survivors of a missile strike?

They have intercepted communication between the survivor and other drug smugglers. The boat was disabled but not destroyed The order was to destroy the boat. They did not want the drugs being picked up by other smugglers.
So you admit there was a second strike when your boyfriend Earl denied there was.

You all need to get your stories straight.

You automatically believe what the White House says. You're a robot.
 
So you admit there was a second strike when your boyfriend Earl denied there was.

You all need to get your stories straight.

You automatically believe what the White House says. You're a robot.
This is what I said no to:

“…they're blaming some admiral for it?”

Pay attention.
 
Didn't both Trump and Hegswith admit there was a second strike on survivors and they're blaming some admiral for it?
Yes. The story changes almost daily. First, it didn't happen. Second, it did happen, but there was no second strike. Now, there was a second strike but they didn't see any survivors.

Weird!
 
Right, there always being a chance the intelligence got it wrong.
Out of 22 known strikes, only one was reported to be a submersible, which is a high-dollar drug transport. That one, October 16th(?), had two survivors but those survivors weren't arrested for trial. They were repatriated back to their home countries.

It's akin to when Trump released 5000 Taliban warriors who went back into circulation killing our troops.

1764770896733.png
 
That's not the issue.

The issue is ordering a second strike to kill survivors.
It was a response to your ridiculous theory that is was a pleasure
craft. The second strike was to destroy the disabled craft and the drugs like the original order said. The first strike did not destroy the craft and its contents so a second strike was needed. We did the same type of thing routinely in WWII. Subs would surface and finish off disabled ships with their deck guns to destroy them rather than wasting more torpedoes .
 
Last edited:
The mission is to stop drugs and Narco-terrorists from spreading death to our citizens.

One strike, two, fifty.

Whatever it takes.

As usual, these far left loons are supporting criminality.
 
A monosyllabic grunt 'No!' without any further elaboration is going to be taken as a denial of the entire question, not just one part of the question.
Take whatever you like.

I don’t give a rat’s culo what you take.

Just continue supporting terrorists.

This is why Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the White House…and the Franklin, Nashville district (where I once lived) won last night by the Republican.
 
That's not the issue.

The issue is ordering a second strike to kill survivors.
Agree on the main issue. While the targeting of boats on the high seas, especially the extrajudicial murder of people, is debatable, it depends upon the intelligence confirming they were, indeed, drug-carrying boats. The specific targeting of survivors is a war crime.

In war, if one plane shoots down another, that's war. If the pilot dies in the attack, that's war. If the pilot bails out and is shot dangling from their parachute or in the water, that's a war crime.
 
Agree on the main issue. While the targeting of boats on the high seas, especially the extrajudicial murder of people, is debatable, it depends upon the intelligence confirming they were, indeed, drug-carrying boats. The specific targeting of survivors is a war crime.

In war, if one plane shoots down another, that's war. If the pilot dies in the attack, that's war. If the pilot bails out and is shot dangling from their parachute or in the water, that's a war crime.
A complaint has been filed by a Colombian woman stating her husband was a fisherman and not a drug smuggler.

 
So you admit there was a second strike when your boyfriend Earl denied there was.

You all need to get your stories straight.

You automatically believe what the White House says. You're a robot.
Yes there was a second strike to sink the disabled drug boat so smugglers could not retrieve the drugs on the boat. Totally legal.
 
Back
Top