Question: What happened to the Epstein files?

Jake Starkey said:
The Founders were certainly far to the left of the Loyalists, yes.
Click to expand...

Quite the opposite.

You seek absolute government. Government as caretaker, providing health care, grocery stores, housing, Individuals are irrelevant, groups that serve the party are whom privilege accrues to.

You are very much like the Monarchists of the time. Totalitarians.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Quite the opposite.

You seek absolute government. Government as caretaker, providing health care, grocery stores, housing, Individuals are irrelevant, groups that serve the party are whom privilege accrues to.

You are very much like the Monarchists of the time. Totalitarians.
Click to expand...
The Monarchist of the times wanted a social MAGA state. So does MAGA today with all allegiance to the Orang Turd.
 
Jake Starkey said:
The Monarchist of the times wanted a social MAGA state.
Click to expand...

I'm aware that you have at best a 6th grade educational level.

Under the European Monarchies, all property belonged to the state, the crown. As with democrats today, private property was forbidden. Barons and Earls (Carls) were appointed by the king to oversee various lands, but no one could own anything.

Nearly identical to California democrats who are seeking to end single family home ownership with Blackrock are the Barrony overseeing all lands on behalf of the crown, the state.

This is very different than the Constitutional Republic that you term "maga state" where private property rights and individual rights are the bedrock of both our government and our culture.

Jake Starkey said:
So does MAGA today with all allegiance to the Orang Turd.
Click to expand...

Trump has allegiance to the Constitution. which makes him the enemy of you who seek a totalitarian Marxist dictatorship.

You got so close in 2021 with the Biden police state - but then the proles rose up and pushed back.

Pendulums swing, Comrade. You Marxists pushed it so far to the left that the swing to the right was inevitable.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
I'm aware that you have at best a 6th grade educational level.

Under the European Monarchies, all property belonged to the state, the crown. As with democrats today, private property was forbidden. Barons and Earls (Carls) were appointed by the king to oversee various lands, but no one could own anything.

Nearly identical to California democrats who are seeking to end single family home ownership with Blackrock are the Barrony overseeing all lands on behalf of the crown, the state.

This is very different than the Constitutional Republic that you term "maga state" where private property rights and individual rights are the bedrock of both our government and our culture.



Trump has allegiance to the Constitution. which makes him the enemy of you who seek a totalitarian Marxist dictatorship.

You got so close in 2021 with the Biden police state - but then the proles rose up and pushed back.

Pendulums swing, Comrade. You Marxists pushed it so far to the left that the swing to the right was inevitable.
Click to expand...
Prove that Democrats want private ownership forbidden.
 
IBDaMann said:
It was a pivot. Why aren't JPP's leftists screeching about everything in the Epstein records that were released? Just because Trump was totally exonerated AGAIN shouldn't explain the complete radio silence from the party of death and open borders.
Click to expand...
What records were released by the DoJ?

I guess JPP leftists don't rely on your fantasies to form their opinions or arguments.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
I'm aware that you have at best a 6th grade educational level.

Under the European Monarchies, all property belonged to the state, the crown.
Click to expand...
Since you are convinced you are so smart please provide a source or two that shows that all land in Europe was owned by the various royal families through the 1800s.

I am just curious as to your sources for this idiotic claim. Perhaps you can explain why you think Gutsherrschaft didn't exist at all in your history of the world.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
I'm aware that you have at best a 6th grade educational level.

Under the European Monarchies, all property belonged to the state, the crown. As with democrats today, private property was forbidden. Barons and Earls (Carls) were appointed by the king to oversee various lands, but no one could own anything.

Nearly identical to California democrats who are seeking to end single family home ownership with Blackrock are the Barrony overseeing all lands on behalf of the crown, the state.

This is very different than the Constitutional Republic that you term "maga state" where private property rights and individual rights are the bedrock of both our government and our culture.



Trump has allegiance to the Constitution. which makes him the enemy of you who seek a totalitarian Marxist dictatorship.

You got so close in 2021 with the Biden police state - but then the proles rose up and pushed back.

Pendulums swing, Comrade. You Marxists pushed it so far to the left that the swing to the right was inevitable.
Click to expand...

You do not know the history or society of Europe in 1775.

Feudalism was long, long gone.

France was 18 years from creating a new Europe.

Go back to school.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Since you are convinced you are so smart please provide a source or two that shows that all land in Europe was owned by the various royal families through the 1800s.
Click to expand...

By the 19th Century most European Monarchies had retreated to parliamentary systems. This was driven mostly by the American and French revolutions. Even the nations not directly involved were swayed by these uprisings to loosening the grip of the Monarchy. Social structures were challenged as early as the 13th century with the Magna Carta. By the 19th century Western Monarchies were a shell of earlier times.

King George the I of England lost the absolute grip on property with the rise of the East India Company - that demanded sovereign control of their own property in the mid-17th century. The Empire depended on the EIC to fuel the empire and capitulated to the rising corporation. This was the beginning of actual private property in England, and later Britain.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
I am just curious as to your sources for this idiotic claim. Perhaps you can explain why you think Gutsherrschaft didn't exist at all in your history of the world.
Click to expand...

I'm curious why you think you are clever? The role of peasant and landlord was critical to the feudal society. Land grants flowed from the Monarchy to various Nobles - as previously explained who had a host of underlings who then had landlords that directly oversaw the peasants below them.

The nobility could seize the lands at will should a particularly landlord displease them. The Crown likewise could and did seize lands from Nobles as the Crown saw fit - for any or no reason. The enlightenment and the age of reason of the 17th century saw the rise of property rights and individual rights as a cause - leading to the American ideals and the offspring of that in France.

Remember, Socialism is simply Feudalism rebranded to appeal to the stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top