Margot
Verified User
That's completely your choice! So you aren't interest in Salvation of the Soul and eternal life either, I assume?So? Most of us do not want the Holy Spirit. We just want life and the actual world.
That's completely your choice! So you aren't interest in Salvation of the Soul and eternal life either, I assume?So? Most of us do not want the Holy Spirit. We just want life and the actual world.
Never was, never will be.So you aren't interest in Salvation of the Soul and eternal life either, I assume?
So, until you really, really, really believe?No! Until you actually have the Holy Spirit, it's all just a concept!
They are all imaginary.
I don't need to make disappear and that which does not exist.
Reasoning isn't wishing. FYI.
^ Logically incoherent because that's not possible, given human nature.I'd make them all disappear if I could.
There are Buddhists, Jews, and Pagan religionists on this board.Christianity is just the best example for the current audience.
People want purpose, meaning, and community, regardless if you or I agree with their religion. What do you propose to replace religion with? State atheism has failed everywhere it's been tried.No. I would like to live in a world free of superstition.
So you seem to be agreeing that even going on a crusade to eliminate Christianity will not rid the world of the perfectly natural human affinity for religious belief and practice in some form.Probably, but that is secondary to the fact that there is no reason, today, to attribute anything to the Christian god that couldn't be attributed to any other God or some future God that man comes up with.
The claim was this:It seems to me that the question being dealt with here is a variation of, "What is the true nature of the REALITY of existence?"...with a particular emphasis on, "Is there a GOD (or are there gods) involved?"
What are you actually saying about the question, ZenMode?
Are you saying that you know the answer to that second part?
Is that how you're attributing certain occurrences?"But He does. Denying it does not make it go away"
He doesn't. The things that happen are going to happen either way. Christians will attribute certain occurrences to their God, Muslims will attribute certain occurrences to their God, Hindus will attribute certain occurrences to their God. They are all imaginary.
That's what I said, dummy -->Physics is a set of theories of science!
Physics is not a 'theory'.
Physics is a scientific discipline.
General relativity and quantum chromodynamics are theories of physics.
The association of events with a deity is all imaginary, as are the deities.Is that how you're attributing certain occurrences?
The electrical and gravitational fields in a cosmic nebula cause the gas and dust particles to behave very predictably in accordance with universal mathematical relationships.A random dust cloud is still a random dust cloud!
Your scenario is wholly dependent upon the assumption that no Christian God exists who could replace what was wiped away.That's why I use to example of wiping all books about the Christian god off the face of the earth and wiping all memories of Christianity from peoples' minds. If that happened, Christianity would cease to exist there is no evidence for the Christian god to revive Christianity.
Okay, so that is how you are attributing certain occurrences.The association of events with a deity is all imaginary, as are the deities.
Thank you for that response, Zen. I agree with part of what you said here and elsewhere. As for the Bible, my take (which I have posted before), is:The claim was this:
"If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book"
Which is true when you're talking about a man-god as Christians claim exists. If the god of the Bible were real, there would be evidence to support its existence and the Bible wouldn't be necessary.
That's why I use to example of wiping all books about the Christian god off the face of the earth and wiping all memories of Christianity from peoples' minds. If that happened, Christianity would cease to exist there is no evidence for the Christian god to revive Christianity.
Correct and my assumption is based on the fact that there is literally nothing happening today that would lead us to believe that the Christian God exists.Your scenario is wholly dependent upon the assumption that no Christian God exists who could replace what was wiped away.
So long as the Christian God exists, all understanding would still exist within him (and could still be reinstituted due to his existence).
Not certain occurrences, all occurrences. People of all religions will attribute certain events to their deity. They do that because they ALREADY believe in a deity, not because there's any reason to attribute events to a deity.Okay, so that is how you are attributing certain occurrences.
Did you know that you are making use of faith-based attributions in order to criticize Christians for making use of faith-based attributions?
A cosmic nebula is a random dust cloud within a random dust cloud within a random dust cloud ... for which no one can predict the behavior of even a single particle. What are you talking about?The electrical and gravitational fields in a cosmic nebula cause the gas and dust particles to behave very predictably
Who are you claiming is predicting the behavior of which particles in which cosmic nebulae?in accordance with universal mathematical relationships.
Which accurate predictions are you claiming are being made with the equations you posted?Even statistical mechanics is able to make accurate predictions even if we don't know the location and momentum of every single atomic particle.
So it's a matter of faith.Correct
There's all sorts of things happening today, ZenMode... just take a look around you.and my assumption is based on the fact that there is literally nothing happening today that would lead us to believe that the Christian God exists.
Yet, you follow this up with discussing certain occurrences (as you did before).Not certain occurrences, all occurrences.
What about the people who didn't believe in a deity until certain events occurred in their lives (or had a particular realization about certain events)? Aren't those people, who didn't already believe in a deity, finding reason to attribute events to a deity?People of all religions will attribute certain events to their deity. They do that because they ALREADY believe in a deity, not because there's any reason to attribute events to a deity.
There are numerous examples of atheists converting to Christianity after philosophical reflection -- famously CS Lewis, and the former 'New Atheist' pundit Ayaan Hirsi Ali. The influential atheist intellectual Jean Paul Satre reportedly converted on his death bed.People of all religions will attribute certain events to their deity. They do that because they ALREADY believe in a deity, not because there's any reason to attribute events to a deity.