If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

[IBDaMann]

Why would walking on a wet, solid surface be mentioned in the Bible as something notable that Jesus did?

You're asking the wrong person. You never showed that there is no God who can work miracles.

 

[ZenMode]

But not a proof.
Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It's not on me to disprove your sky wizard, it's on you to prove it.

 

[ZenMode]

You are not Jesus. YOU said it's impossible to walk on water.

I do it fairly often.

I said it goes against science, which it does.

Remember when you pretended you care about science?

 

[ZenMode]

You're asking the wrong person. You never showed that there is no God who can work miracles.

You never show there isn't an island of magical rainbow unicorns in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I guess we're both stuck! Lol...

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I don't have to show that something doesn't exist which you have never shown does exist.

 

[ZenMode]

If "nothing new [is] happening", then what caused you to change your mind about Christianity?

No new evidence of God/Jesus.

 

[IBDaMann]

You never show there isn't an island of magical rainbow unicorns in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I guess we're both stuck! Lol...

Then we both acknowledge that both cases are possibilities.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

When you claim to have verified that specific events of the distant past did not occur, you are making an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence.

I don't have to show that something doesn't exist which you have never shown does exist.

You bear the full burden to support your affirmative claims.

 

[ZenMode]

Then we both acknowledge that both cases are possibilities.

Possibilities? If we are saying that, in the larger scheme of the universe, it's not impossible, yes. If we're saying that I'm going to start a religion based off of the possibility of magical rainbow unicorns in the middle of the ocean, and structure my life around that... No. Religious people simply need to apply the same requirement for evidence to their sky wizard that they do to literally everything else on the planet, and then religion would just go away for good.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

zionists are on the brink of destroying the very concept of positive religion with their bitter racist hatred against the world.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

yep. you failed.

I knew it.

many atheists hate humanity, but some love humanity, but most don't, but some do, but most don't.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

Then we both acknowledge that both cases are possibilities.


When you claim to have verified that specific events of the distant past did not occur, you are making an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence.


You bear the full burden to support your affirmative claims.

this makes you look very stupid.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

QED.

The good news is that, where he's going, at least he'll be warm. LOL

hell is fake.

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

What are the beliefs of atheists? As an atheist myself, I should probably find out.

did you get my notes on your beliefs, fuckface?

 

[Freddy Figbottom]

Some Lutherans do believe in Christ's teachings, but generally speaking, yes it's true that many of them don't.

The largest/most popular Lutheran church denomination is the ELCA. They reject a plethora of Christ's teachings and other biblical doctrines (e.g. they condone homosexuality, they condone abortion, and they allow women to be pastors).

Meanwhile, there are some other "less popular" Lutheran church denominations who are typically much better about believing in Christ's teachings (such as LCMS and WELS), but the ELCA denomination is what most people think of when they think of the word Lutheran.

what about Christians who delusionally believe israel matters?

 

[Into the Night]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It's not on me to disprove your sky wizard, it's on you to prove it.

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

Apparently only YOU believe in this 'sky wizard'. I have never heard anyone else talk about it.

 

[Into the Night]

I said it goes against science, which it does.

Remember when you pretended you care about science?

Where? I walk on water fairly often. I have ignored no theory of science.
YOU have already ignored several, including the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, the Stefan-Boltzmann law, Newton's Law of Motion, Einstein's law of relativity, the ideal gas law, Heisenberg's law, and quantum mechanics.

 

[Into the Night]

You never show there isn't an island of magical rainbow unicorns in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I guess we're both stuck! Lol...

Why should he?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I don't have to show that something doesn't exist which you have never shown does exist.

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

No new evidence of God/Jesus.

You can't make evidence just disappear, Void. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Possibilities? If we are saying that, in the larger scheme of the universe, it's not impossible, yes. If we're saying that I'm going to start a religion based off of the possibility of magical rainbow unicorns in the middle of the ocean, and structure my life around that... No. Religious people simply need to apply the same requirement for evidence to their sky wizard that they do to literally everything else on the planet, and then religion would just go away for good.

So you believe there are magical unicorns in the Atlantic ocean, and in some kind of 'sky wizard'.

I must say, your beliefs are certainly unique!

I suppose it's no weirder than believing there is no God, or that climate can somehow change, or that masks can somehow stop a virus, or that hating Trump is somehow going to accomplish something,...

 

[Into the Night]

zionists are on the brink of destroying the very concept of positive religion with their bitter racist hatred against the world.

Go learn what Zionist means.
Buzzword fallacy. Non-sequitur fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

yep. you failed.

I knew it.

many atheists hate humanity, but some love humanity, but most don't, but some do, but most don't.

I don't know of any atheist that hates humanity. You are deluded.