WinterBorn
Verified User
Whatever evidence they have showing you to be a danger to the flight is also used in the gun background checks.
Serious question for Gun Advocates.
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
Whatever evidence they have showing you to be a danger to the flight is also used in the gun background checks.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
do you support the total removal of guns?
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
I had a gun the last time I went on a plane.
Half ounce, too.
There's a bullet around here someplace from then.
Just one, but there were more.
Can't remember what kinda bullet it was, it's a real funky one and I only bought 1 box of them ever.
Probably not even made anymore.
Might would know it if I saw it.
Half ounce, too.
There's a bullet around here someplace from then.
Just one, but there were more.
Can't remember what kinda bullet it was, it's a real funky one and I only bought 1 box of them ever.
Probably not even made anymore.
Might would know it if I saw it.
Last edited:
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I've often asked those left of me, "If Obama had passed his 2013 gun control bill act, would that be the end or just the beginning?" I've never had a person reply with an answer.
WinterBorn
Verified User
So many don't want their goals known.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Regardless if they are Left or Right, those seeking to limit the freedom of people based upon what they might do is oppressive.
We need to do better.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
1. You made an accusation, so I asked you to link the post where I advocated in no uncertain terms for total removal of guns or the 2nd Amendment. If you can't. that makes you a liar. So you since you didn't, that makes you a liar.
2. After all the BS and smoke blowing, you finally make a declarative statement. Now all you have to do is PROVE IT with valid source documentation. You need to do this because I poste on #11 here a link from a few years ago that clearly states otherwise. Read it carefully and comprehensively and try not to take things out of context and have a gun monkey orgasm.
www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/why-can-people-on-the-terrorist-watch-list-buy-guns-and-other-faqs
If you have new information to the contrary, please post the link. Your personal opinion, supposition and conjecture won't cut. Put up or shut up.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
You talk a lot of shit for a guy who dummied up after I responded to you with Post #11. Fascinating how you gun monkeys will twist like pretzels regarding the prevention of anyone under any circumstance getting a gun ... even potential repeat 9-11 offenders.Ageed. Worse for the Democrats, the harder they push to ban guns, the more often SCOTUS comes back with firmer protections of the Second Amendment.
Again, I think the Democrats should change their 30-year-old failing strategy and take a different tack.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Because it's a stupid gun monkey idea of a "got'cha" question. It ASSUMES that ANY gun control law is a prelude to full confiscation of weapons from the citizenry. For ALL the federal gun laws that came before and during our life times, there has been NO BLANKET CONFISCATION OF FIREARMS IN THE 50 STATES. Hell, if you bought weapons before they made a ban list, YOU COULD AND CAN KEEP THAT WEAPON.
So your "question" is irrelevant in lieu of history. And here's what Obama proposed: www.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/16/remarks-president-and-vice-president-gun-violence
And for the record; you don't have the maturity to give a straight answer after Post #11. Care to do so now?