Libs why is it OK

Babbitt was leading a group to hang Pence and others. It was a just shoot.
I see. So then this retarded dingbat was interfering with with law enforcement officials in the lawful execution of their authorized duties. It was a justified shot.

The rent a cop that shit ashli babbitt could have tripped her up to stop her but thought cold blooded murder was a better option. You're a stupid ass motherfucker
 
I see. So then this retarded dingbat was interfering with with law enforcement officials in the lawful execution of their authorized duties. It was a justified shot.

The rent a cop that shit ashli babbitt could have tripped her up to stop her but thought cold blooded murder was a better option. You're a stupid ass motherfucker
No, it was not. He will go to jail. A capitol policeman shot Ashlii in a righteous shoot.
 
Regarding the two shots through the open window as the car went past:

Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.

Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.

Cordova vs Aragon (2009): Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.

Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.
 
Regarding the two shots through the open window as the car went past:

Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.

Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.

Cordova vs Aragon (2009): Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.

Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.
These all describe the situation from yesterday.
 
No the rent a cop killed an unarmed woman I cold blood. He could have tripped her up. You're suggesting an unarmed woman was more of a threat than a retarded dyke in a vehicle. You're too fucking stupid to talk to
She was armed with a mob, chanting their intent to murder the VIce President who was just beyond the glass she breached.

The difference is that the woman in Minnesota was trying to get away, Babbitt was trying to lead the way.
 
Regarding the two shots through the open window as the car went past:

Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.

Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.

Cordova vs Aragon (2009): Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.

Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.
The Minnesota woman was shot through the front driver side windshield by an office using his right hand. So your examples do not apply.
 
She was armed with a mob, chanting their intent to murder the VIce President who was just beyond the glass she breached.

The difference is that the woman in Minnesota was trying to get away, Babbitt was trying to lead the way.
Lmfao first problem is she was unarmed and could have been tripped up to be stopped but the rent a cop decided on cold blooded murder. She also she wasnt the only apparent "threat" but was the only one murdered in cold blood. Lastly how did rent a cop know her "intent"? Did she announce why she was there?

Get away after interfering with law enforcement officials in the lawful execution of their authorized duties. I've never seen that turn out well for anyone but you deformed twats think you can do whatever the fuck you want and not have to deal with consequences. The best part is you idiots don't learn so more of you leeches on society will be purged.
 
How do they know she was a " LIB "
She could have just been a pissed off MAGA we don't know.

We know exactly who she was. A self-proclaimed immigration activist. 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good, divorced leftist wine woman. and Trump hater. Active on social media with Trump hate and anti-ICE posts. She decided to take action and impede federal agents on behalf of the insurrection.

My guess is she panicked when they came to arrest her, MSNBC never told her that would happen. No doubt half a box into the Costco Chardonnay by that point, she gunned the car and hit the officer - earning her position as a martyr of the insurrection.

An Insurrectionist Hero is Something to Be...
 
Lmfao first problem is she was unarmed and could have been tripped up to be stopped but the rent a cop decided on cold blooded murder. She also she wasnt the only apparent "threat" but was the only one murdered in cold blood. Lastly how did rent a cop know her "intent"? Did she announce why she was there?

Get away after interfering with law enforcement officials in the lawful execution of their authorized duties. I've never seen that turn out well for anyone but you deformed twats think you can do whatever the fuck you want and not have to deal with consequences. The best part is you idiots don't learn so more of you leeches on society will be purged.
Babbitt was a threat if you understand anything about mobs, once one person breaks through and is not stopped, the group will move forward, they clearly would have advanced into the secure area protecting the VP. She did announce why she was there, "Hang Mike Pence".

The police are not allowed to kill you for trying to get away after interfering with them. That is the law.
 
Babbitt was a threat if you understand anything about mobs, once one person breaks through and is not stopped, the group will move forward, they clearly would have advanced into the secure area protecting the VP. She did announce why she was there, "Hang Mike Pence".

The police are not allowed to kill you for trying to get away after interfering with them. That is the law.
Need a citation for Ashley Babbit saying "Hang Mike Pence".
 
Babbitt was a threat if you understand anything about mobs, once one person breaks through and is not stopped, the group will move forward, they clearly would have advanced into the secure area protecting the VP. She did announce why she was there, "Hang Mike Pence".

The police are not allowed to kill you for trying to get away after interfering with them. That is the law.
I know she was unarmed and could have been tripped up to be stopped. Show evidenced of her making the statement.

She threatened the ICE agent with her vehicle. That dumbass ho posed a much greater threat to the ICE agent than ashli babbitt did to pence when she was murdered in cold blood.
 
Back
Top