A divorced lesbian mother of three driving around with her partner looking for ICE activity?How do they know she was a " LIB "
She could have just been a pissed off MAGA we don't know.
You do the math.
A divorced lesbian mother of three driving around with her partner looking for ICE activity?How do they know she was a " LIB "
She could have just been a pissed off MAGA we don't know.
I see. So then this retarded dingbat was interfering with with law enforcement officials in the lawful execution of their authorized duties. It was a justified shot.Babbitt was leading a group to hang Pence and others. It was a just shoot.
No, it was not. He will go to jail. A capitol policeman shot Ashlii in a righteous shoot.I see. So then this retarded dingbat was interfering with with law enforcement officials in the lawful execution of their authorized duties. It was a justified shot.
The rent a cop that shit ashli babbitt could have tripped her up to stop her but thought cold blooded murder was a better option. You're a stupid ass motherfucker
Want to rephrase that?Babbitt was leading a group to hang Pence and others. It was a just shoot.
No the rent a cop killed an unarmed woman I cold blood. He could have tripped her up. You're suggesting an unarmed woman was more of a threat than a retarded dyke in a vehicle. You're too fucking stupid to talk toNo, it was not. He will go to jail. A capitol policeman shot Ashlii in a righteous shoot.
These all describe the situation from yesterday.Regarding the two shots through the open window as the car went past:
Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.
Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.
Cordova vs Aragon (2009): Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.
Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.
She was armed with a mob, chanting their intent to murder the VIce President who was just beyond the glass she breached.No the rent a cop killed an unarmed woman I cold blood. He could have tripped her up. You're suggesting an unarmed woman was more of a threat than a retarded dyke in a vehicle. You're too fucking stupid to talk to
The Minnesota woman was shot through the front driver side windshield by an office using his right hand. So your examples do not apply.Regarding the two shots through the open window as the car went past:
Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.
Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.
Cordova vs Aragon (2009): Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.
Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.
You don't know the various meanings of "just?"Want to rephrase that?
Lmfao first problem is she was unarmed and could have been tripped up to be stopped but the rent a cop decided on cold blooded murder. She also she wasnt the only apparent "threat" but was the only one murdered in cold blood. Lastly how did rent a cop know her "intent"? Did she announce why she was there?She was armed with a mob, chanting their intent to murder the VIce President who was just beyond the glass she breached.
The difference is that the woman in Minnesota was trying to get away, Babbitt was trying to lead the way.
How do they know she was a " LIB "
She could have just been a pissed off MAGA we don't know.
Babbitt was a threat if you understand anything about mobs, once one person breaks through and is not stopped, the group will move forward, they clearly would have advanced into the secure area protecting the VP. She did announce why she was there, "Hang Mike Pence".Lmfao first problem is she was unarmed and could have been tripped up to be stopped but the rent a cop decided on cold blooded murder. She also she wasnt the only apparent "threat" but was the only one murdered in cold blood. Lastly how did rent a cop know her "intent"? Did she announce why she was there?
Get away after interfering with law enforcement officials in the lawful execution of their authorized duties. I've never seen that turn out well for anyone but you deformed twats think you can do whatever the fuck you want and not have to deal with consequences. The best part is you idiots don't learn so more of you leeches on society will be purged.
Need a citation for Ashley Babbit saying "Hang Mike Pence".Babbitt was a threat if you understand anything about mobs, once one person breaks through and is not stopped, the group will move forward, they clearly would have advanced into the secure area protecting the VP. She did announce why she was there, "Hang Mike Pence".
The police are not allowed to kill you for trying to get away after interfering with them. That is the law.
I know she was unarmed and could have been tripped up to be stopped. Show evidenced of her making the statement.Babbitt was a threat if you understand anything about mobs, once one person breaks through and is not stopped, the group will move forward, they clearly would have advanced into the secure area protecting the VP. She did announce why she was there, "Hang Mike Pence".
The police are not allowed to kill you for trying to get away after interfering with them. That is the law.