Libs why is it OK

For people to create convoys to impede law enforcement ??



Federal Law: It is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 111 to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with federal law enforcement officers while they are performing their duties


That's what this Lib nut was doing! Because she doesn't agree with the laws on immigration .....if u don't agree u do it in the voting booth etc not with your car blocking and driving at cops
One thing you won't see is us nigg's out here questioning this shit or rallying for this white woman. We no matter what happens to who, ain't getting involved in this immigrant shit. They voted for Trump, at least 23% of somolians did and this is what they have.
 
Babbitt was a threat if you understand anything about mobs, once one person breaks through and is not stopped, the group will move forward, they clearly would have advanced into the secure area protecting the VP. She did announce why she was there, "Hang Mike Pence".

The police are not allowed to kill you for trying to get away after interfering with them. That is the law.
I find it interesting that the trials of two Valdez Texas cowards has commenced where nobody was brave enough to SHOOT FIRST AND ASK QUESTIONS LATER when 21 babies were being slaughtered and this MN shit all happening at the same times. Oh, the irony of it all.
 
She turned away from the cop. The have him out of state now, or he would be arrested.
All these ICE agents are nothing but failed white men in life, who like the German losers of WWII, find solace and comfort in a thug regime that allots them supreme power with a gun over minorities with the blessings of their Nazi leaders. I hope this sends a clear message to everybody wanting to take a stand in support of immigrants, WHO BREAK LAWS....to stay out the way, take notes from us black folk and let ICE do their damn jobs. Do any of yall not watch and see what has gone in Somalia MN???
 
Regarding the two shots through the open window as the car went past:
Windshield was not open
Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.

Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.

Cordova vs Aragon (2009): Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.

Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.
We can allow others sort that part out.
 
Regarding the two shots through the open window as the car went past:

Adam’s vs. Speers (2020): Once Speers was no longer in the path of the vehicle, the justification for the use of deadly force ended.

Orn vs. City of Tacoma (2019): A reasonable jury could conclude that once Orn was no longer in the car’s trajectory, the threat of serious physical harm to him was eliminated.

Cordova vs Aragon (2009): Where the officer had moved out of the way of the oncoming vehicle, the use of deadly force was not justified.

Villanueva vs. Cali (2021): a reasonable jury could conclude that the Officers used excessive force, because they lacked an objectively reasonable basis to fear for their own safety, as they could simply have stepped back or to the side to avoid being injured.
If the ICE guy was worried that she was going to hit him...THE LAST THING he would do is to shoot her. The car would then be driving out of control.

This is such bullshit. The cult members know how they are supposed to react...how their Fuhrer wants them to react. And like the slaves they are...they are doing as good a job as they can.

What a bunch of losers.
 
Back
Top