ICE agents committing assaults and other crimes

Poor Richard Saunders said:
LOL. You are quite funny as you make claims that clearly can't be true. Are you seriously claiming that Trump's signature on a check is hearsay. How is Trump's signature hearsay? Tell us what the cult thinks.

You talk of endless whining as you endlessly whine and make idiotic claims. You clearly don't have a clue what hearsay actually is.

Here is one of the checks that Trump signed and the notes that Weisselberg made showing how they calculated the payments.
www.scribd.com

Legal Payment Records | PDF | Donald Trump | American Government

This document is an invoice for legal services provided to Donald J. Trump by Michael D. Cohen for $35,000. It includes billing details like the date, invoice number, description and amounts. A check was issued to Michael D. Cohen Esq for the full amount on May 23, 2017.
www.scribd.com www.scribd.com
Click to expand...
LOL, you dumb bastard. I said there wasn't any evidence that proved Trump committed the crime he was convicted of, and that's still 100 percent true. Maybe you need remedial reading lessons, or at least someone to hold your hand through basic facts. The standard isn't what some brain-dead radical with raging TDS screams is 'proof'. Try to remember what he was convicted for. Again, paying for an NDA itself isn't illegal, and he wasn't convicted for that.

Let me spell this out for the class one more time, since you clearly need the repetition. Your little 'document' fantasy pretends the trial was about whether Trump committed some grave 'crime' that thousands of politicians, CEOs, and presidents have pulled off for centuries, some of them multiple times without a single charge. Hush money and NDAs to shut up accusers, true story or not, is as common as dirt in DC and corporate boardrooms. It goes back to Thomas Jefferson paying off a journalist to bury negative stories, Warren Harding shelling out to mistresses, John Edwards dumping nearly a million on his side piece during a campaign, and on and on. The actual 'crime' here? Trump allegedly falsified 34 Trump Organization business records. The problem? There's zero proof, just your feelings, as usual. Or maybe you can explain how your evidence makes the case, lol.

Your lame attempt to act like you know what you're talking about falls flat on its face. Trump signed one check? Who gives a flying fuck, that doesn't prove he cooked the books on 34 separate entries. You trot out his CFO's scribbled notes like they're a smoking gun proving Trump personally falsified everything? They don't even come close, genius. I pored over ALL of the evidence, and I still can't believe that hack judge let the circus drag on. Piles of irrelevant bullshit any real judge would've shut down instantly: Again, endless clickbait articles masquerading as 'evidence,' mountains of meaningless documents that only 'prove' something when combined with left-wing fever-dream theories. That was the whole case, other than the word of a scumbag staring at being broke after he got out of jail. He would have been laughed out of any court that wasn't full of anti-American libtards that think the Constitution is only relevant when it serves their agenda.

You're the classic radical drone, flipping your principles, morals, logic, and even the smug look on your face the second the information benefits the other side of the aisle. You lost your logic card years ago, if you ever had one to begin with. Keep trying, your ignorance is showing. I'm wrong? Prove it. You sure as hell haven't yet. Prediction: You'll claim I am repeating cult talking points, call me a few names, and claim it's pointless to continue, lol. The one thing you won't do? Provide any damning evidence that makes the case outside of Cohen's testimony. Remember, that's what we're arguing about.
 
Into the Night said:
It is not ICE's fault that she intentionally tried to intefere with federal officers and then tried to run over one of them!

The are ENFORCING the law, Sybil.

Not his personal army, Sybil.

The didn't smash any window until the shots, when she tried to run over a federal officer.

If the seat belt is in the way of an arrest, it is cut. The car is impounded anyway.
Click to expand...
Amazing what these morons focus on. Seatbelt being cut? LOL. As if they were waiting for an opportunity to cut a seatbelt. They want to drag drones from their cars. They love all of this, right? I've seen far more restraint than I would be capable of. They all should get medals and bonuses for putting up with these freaks acting like spoiled toddlers without unleashing the hell many are capable of.
 
Tobytone said:
LOL, you dumb bastard. I said there wasn't any evidence that proved Trump committed the crime he was convicted of, and that's still 100 percent true. Maybe you need remedial reading lessons, or at least someone to hold your hand through basic facts. The standard isn't what some brain-dead radical with raging TDS screams is 'proof'. Try to remember what he was convicted for. Again, paying for an NDA itself isn't illegal, and he wasn't convicted for that.
Click to expand...
Wow. I guess you decided to prove you lied when you said you know about the case. I'll bet you can't even tell us what crime he was convicted of.
There was plenty of evidence that he committed the fraud. His signature is on the checks.
Tobytone said:
Let me spell this out for the class one more time, since you clearly need the repetition. Your little 'document' fantasy pretends the trial was about whether Trump committed some grave 'crime' that thousands of politicians, CEOs, and presidents have pulled off for centuries, some of them multiple times without a single charge. Hush money and NDAs to shut up accusers, true story or not, is as common as dirt in DC and corporate boardrooms. It goes back to Thomas Jefferson paying off a journalist to bury negative stories, Warren Harding shelling out to mistresses, John Edwards dumping nearly a million on his side piece during a campaign, and on and on. The actual 'crime' here? Trump allegedly falsified 34 Trump Organization business records. The problem? There's zero proof, just your feelings, as usual. Or maybe you can explain how your evidence makes the case, lol.
Click to expand...
Once again. You prove you know nothing about the case. The crime was not the NDA. In fact if Trump had simply paid Daniels off there would have likely been no crime.
Tobytone said:
Your lame attempt to act like you know what you're talking about falls flat on its face. Trump signed one check? Who gives a flying fuck, that doesn't prove he cooked the books on 34 separate entries. You trot out his CFO's scribbled notes like they're a smoking gun proving Trump personally falsified everything? They don't even come close, genius. I pored over ALL of the evidence, and I still can't believe that hack judge let the circus drag on. Piles of irrelevant bullshit any real judge would've shut down instantly: Again, endless clickbait articles masquerading as 'evidence,' mountains of meaningless documents that only 'prove' something when combined with left-wing fever-dream theories. That was the whole case, other than the word of a scumbag staring at being broke after he got out of jail. He would have been laughed out of any court that wasn't full of anti-American libtards that think the Constitution is only relevant when it serves their agenda.
Click to expand...
Trump didn't sign just one check. Trump signed several. Trump has repeatedly said he knows about all the spending done by his company and approves it. So based on Trump's own statements he was aware of the falsification. The funny thing is how you claim any real judge would have shut this down but it hasn't been overturned on appeal yet.
Tobytone said:
You're the classic radical drone, flipping your principles, morals, logic, and even the smug look on your face the second the information benefits the other side of the aisle. You lost your logic card years ago, if you ever had one to begin with. Keep trying, your ignorance is showing. I'm wrong? Prove it. You sure as hell haven't yet. Prediction: You'll claim I am repeating cult talking points, call me a few names, and claim it's pointless to continue, lol. The one thing you won't do? Provide any damning evidence that makes the case outside of Cohen's testimony. Remember, that's what we're arguing about.
Click to expand...
LOL. You are so against fraud unless someone is actually convicted of fraud, then you think they were falsely accused. Maybe you should look in the mirror that the cult seems to have taken away from you.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Wow. I guess you decided to prove you lied when you said you know about the case. I'll bet you can't even tell us what crime he was convicted of.
There was plenty of evidence that he committed the fraud. His signature is on the checks.
Click to expand...
Signing a check isn't fraud, Poorboy.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Once again. You prove you know nothing about the case. The crime was not the NDA. In fact if Trump had simply paid Daniels off there would have likely been no crime.
Click to expand...
An NDA is not a crime, Poorboy. No crime. Paying someone is not a crime.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Trump didn't sign just one check. Trump signed several. Trump has repeatedly said he knows about all the spending done by his company and approves it. So based on Trump's own statements he was aware of the falsification. The funny thing is how you claim any real judge would have shut this down but it hasn't been overturned on appeal yet.
Click to expand...
Signing a check isn't a crime, Poorboy. Knowing your own company is not a crime either. No falsification. No fraud.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
LOL. You are so against fraud unless someone is actually convicted of fraud, then you think they were falsely accused. Maybe you should look in the mirror that the cult seems to have taken away from you.
Click to expand...
What fraud? You cannot justify a kangaroo court.
 
Into the Night said:
Signing a check isn't fraud, Poorboy.

An NDA is not a crime, Poorboy. No crime. Paying someone is not a crime.

Signing a check isn't a crime, Poorboy. Knowing your own company is not a crime either. No falsification. No fraud.

What fraud? You cannot justify a kangaroo court.
Click to expand...
Lucky for you stupidity isn't a crime. It seems your stupidity is your life sentence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top