CNN: "The American people are with Nicki Minaj… they favor photo ID to vote"

Libheytore said:
Well, of course every dem in America doesn't want voter I.D. for that would exclude thousands if not millions of biden's illegals from voting the straight democrat ticket.
Click to expand...
Reason #743 on why I know you are an anti-American, oath-breaking Satanist who has turned his back on Jesus Christ and now worships a false god.

Is it really any wonder why you hate your "three radical leftist brothers" but they don't hate you back? It's because you are evil and have turned your back on God and the message of Jesus Christ.

Libheytore said:
Interesting that your father was a Republican yet you decided to become a democrat. Both my parents were Republicans yet my 3 brothers
turned into radical Democrats/Marxists. Go Figure!
Click to expand...
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Reason #743 on why I know you are an anti-American, oath-breaking Satanist who has turned his back on Jesus Christ and now worships a false god.

Is it really any wonder why you hate your "three radical leftist brothers" but they don't hate you back? It's because you are evil and have turned your back on God and the message of Jesus Christ.
Click to expand...
You calling my three leftist brothers 'RADICAL' is just so precious, in that you saying that proves that you agree with leftism as being radical. I wouldn't call my brothers 'radical', rather. I would call them uninformed and politically disoriented, as how I would describe 'YOU'! I don't see how that shows me turning my back on Jesus.
 
Libheytore said:
You calling my three leftist brothers 'RADICAL' is just so precious, in that you saying that proves that you agree with leftism as being radical. I wouldn't call my brothers 'radical', rather. I would call them uninformed and politically disoriented, as how I would describe 'YOU'! I don't see how that shows me turning my back on Jesus.
Click to expand...
Dude, stop doing drugs and/or abusing alcohol. Take your meds. It's from your own quote, son.
 
Yakuda said:
Let's try again. For reasons that at too distressing to remember, I had the unfortunate experience in the distance past of living in Massachusetts for a while. I had multiple opportunities to vote while there and the only thing I had to provide to vote was my address. I was never asked to prove I actually lived at that address or that I was the person listed under that address to vote. How would anyone know fraud took place especially if the voting roles are not up to date? Shove your next up your ass
Click to expand...
Now answer a question honestly, in that Mass district you lived in let’s say there were 1000 voters, how many phony voters would have to vote to make that district’s tally wrong? And you wouldn’t you need that many in all the districts to sway the vote

As I noted, as do all the studies, it exists but no where the extent that it would be worth even possibly disenfranchising existing voters
 
archives said:
Now answer a question honestly, in that Mass district you lived in let’s say there were 1000 voters, how many phony voters would have to vote to make that district’s tally wrong? And you wouldn’t you need that many in all the districts to sway the vote

As I noted, as do all the studies, it exists but no where the extent that it would be worth even possibly disenfranchising existing voters
Click to expand...
And it will ALWAYS exist to that meaningless extent.

We have lots of examples of magats, in the last election voting for dead spouses, etc and that won't be stopped by this but it is also meaningless in terms of impact on the election.
 
archives said:
Now answer a question honestly, in that Mass district you lived in let’s say there were 1000 voters, how many phony voters would have to vote to make that district’s tally wrong? And you wouldn’t you need that many in all the districts to sway the vote

As I noted, as do all the studies, it exists but no where the extent that it would be worth even possibly disenfranchising existing voters
Click to expand...
It's irrelevant because in any given election no one can verify they the vote is legitimate as there is no way to know who voted and if those people are even eligible to vote. If you want to argue it doesn't matter then do away with all election laws and anyone who shows up can vote.
 
Yakuda said:
It's irrelevant because in any given election no one can verify they the vote is legitimate as there is no way to know who voted and if those people are even eligible to vote. If you want to argue it doesn't matter then do away with all election laws and anyone who shows up can vote.
Click to expand...
So the half dozen illegitimate votes means the entire election is bogus? You going to throw out the other 99% of votes that were legitimate?

If you define yourself as a Democratic Republic elections are mandatory and participation should be encouraged not dwarfed
 
archives said:
So the half dozen illegitimate votes means the entire election is bogus? You going to throw out the other 99% of votes that were legitimate?

If you define yourself as a Democratic Republic elections are mandatory and participation should be encouraged not dwarfed
Click to expand...
You're assuming they're legitimate if you have no way to verify who actually voted. You should actually listening to yourself sometime.

I agree it's WHO is actually casting the ballots that bothers me. Why would anyone want to oppose making something as serious as voting and elections as accurate as possible? No ID doesnt make it accurate. Outdated voter roles doesnt make it accurate. Just sending mail in ballots to addresses doesn't make it accurate. It's rife for abuse. Why would anyone want that?
 
archives said:
So the half dozen illegitimate votes means the entire election is bogus? You going to throw out the other 99% of votes that were legitimate?

If you define yourself as a Democratic Republic elections are mandatory and participation should be encouraged not dwarfed
Click to expand...
There is no evidence fraudulent votes ever swayed a national election. The numbers are too small.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Everybody had to prove citizenship when they first registered to vote. The registrations are turned into the election commission. Then the election commission checked the form to see if it was right. Then they assigned you a precinct to vote in, and your name was entered in the precinct logbook. Non-citizens cannot vote in national elections.
After the election, the votes are checked. There are very, very few improper votes. The culprits are prosecuted. My experience is that more illegal votes are for Republicans.
 
Nordberg said:
Everybody had to prove citizenship when they first registered to vote. The registrations are turned into the election commission. Then the election commission checked the form to see if it was right. Then they assigned you a precinct to vote in, and your name was entered in the precinct logbook. Non-citizens cannot vote in national elections.
After the election, the votes are checked. There are very, very few improper votes. The culprits are prosecuted. My experience is that more illegal votes are for Republicans.
Click to expand...
MAGAts, in general, are stupid, poorly educated, and/or demented. They conflate the fact some states, like their hated California, allow illegals to vote in local elections with the fact Federal law prohibits illegals from voting in national elections.

As you pointed out, one has to prove citizenship to register. Their concern is that your Mexican lawnkeeper will vote in your place.

To call MAGAts conspiracy theorists is to minimize their wacky mindset.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top