The emails and texts will be interesting. They better have used encryption. You know he was part of the planning. He didn't just turn up there by accident.
Don Lemon
- Thread starter FastLane
- Start date
So it seems to be trespassing.
there’s no general “duty to report” but knowledge can be part of a crime if you do more than just know, for example Conspiracy / aiding & abetting: you agree to help or take steps to further the offense.
He is on record saying he wants to make them uncomfortable. So he had knowledge, and intended to aid them
Yes that too. But that is a state charge and this is Minnesota
18 U.S. Code § 248 - Freedom of access to clinic entrances
prev | next(a)Prohibited Activities.—Whoever—
(1)
by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person because that person is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons from, obtaining or providing reproductive health services;
(2)
by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship; or
(3)
intentionally damages or destroys the property of a facility, or attempts to do so, because such facility provides reproductive health services, or intentionally damages or destroys the property of a place of religious worship,
shall be subject to the penalties provided in subsection (b) and the civil remedies provided in subsection
Federal prosecutors have alleged Lemon and Fort participated in a “takeover-style attack” of the church and intimidated congregants. A federal prosecutor in court last week said Lemon told his audience the protest’s purpose was to make the experience traumatic and uncomfortable for the congregants.
Post the record.
Looks like he didn't disrupt the service. The protesters did. So it looks like the charge will be null and void.
Yep he stood outside the Church and told his audience the purpose was to make the congregation "uncomfortable." One lady was so scared that when she ran out of the Church she slipped and injured her arm. Children were crying. Parents were blocked from reaching there kids down stairs. Prisoners were screamed at and call Nazis.
When he did not leave when the pastor told him to and he kept interviewing he was a disruption.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
He didn't disrupt the service.
Probably. But at least it is something.I fear that cocksucker will only get probation.
He should do prison time, IMO.
The Church is in St. Paul and that Court division is a little more conservative than the one in Minneapolis. But they are both in Minnesota so pretty liberal.
QP!
Verified User
So you admit you don't know what you are talking about. Like usual.
I replied to the idiot who wrote this OP and seems not to understand what he wrote./..
"As a reporter" YES he would have every right to be there.
If you leave out that he participated in murder or other crimes when there then when someone says 'as a reporter he would have a right to be there', you do not get to ONLY THEN SAY 'but he commited murder while there' or other cirmes.
Last edited:
He went up on the podium. stuck his microphone in the preacher's face and did not leave when he was told to leave. I don't know about your church but mine would consider that disruptive. "Leave ," No I'm gong to stand here and talk to people so you can't give the sermon."
That was AFTER the service was disrupted.He went up on the podium. stuck his microphone in the preacher's face and did not leave when he was told to leave. I don't know about your church but mine would consider that disruptive. "Leave ," No I'm gong to stand here and talk to people so you can't give the sermon."
It was an ongoing disruption.
Lemon was continuing the disruption. If it was after the disruption the Preacher could have continue his sermon.
I guess reporting at a plane crash site is a ongoing disruption.
So a reporter could go in an abortion clinic after the baby's body was ripped from the womb and it's hear stopped and you would be fine as long as the woman was in recovery.
Not seeing the correlation.So a reporter could go in an abortion clinic after the baby's body was ripped from the womb and it's hear stopped and you would be fine as long as the woman was in recovery.