Don Lemon

So the answer is yes. If the members can't hear you there is no point to preaching. That is like someone standing in front of the sign interpreter for you. The preacher can preach but if you can't see what he said he can't preach to you.
Must be a poor sound system. :dunno:
 
Yep when Lemon said the purpose was to make them uncomfortable he he was standing outside and that speech is protected IMHO but it well explain why Lemon went inside the church and interrupted the services which is a clear violation of the FACE Act. and is a denial of Christians civil rights to worship.
I can tell you why the No Kings protesters were showing up to protest.

I can tell you why the Jan 6th protesters and insurrectionist were showing up to Congress.

I can tell you why the protesters in Minneapolis are going out into the streets and blowing whistles and obstructing traffic, etc.

Me knowing that and telling you that DOES NOT MEAN i am responsible for it.

A reporter can know the same things i know above, and state it in their reporting and that DOES NOT MEAN, they are responsible for it.

You got nothing and you KNOW you got nothing and thus this non stop attempt to stretch nothing, with lies, into something.
 
I can tell you why the No Kings protesters were showing up to protest.

I can tell you why the Jan 6th protesters and insurrectionist were showing up to Congress.

I can tell you why the protesters in Minneapolis are going out into the streets and blowing whistles and obstructing traffic, etc.

Me knowing that and telling you that DOES NOT MEAN i am responsible for it.

A reporter can know the same things i know above, and state it in their reporting and that DOES NOT MEAN, they are responsible for it.

You got nothing and you KNOW you got nothing and thus this non stop attempt to stretch nothing, with lies, into something.
Deflection. :rofl2:
 
Deflection. :rofl2:
to a stupid person, maybe.

That is a direct answer to your non- point.

'ZOMG he knew what the protesters stated goal for their action was... thus he must be guilty of it too'

... said only the idiot named Fastlane.
 
to a stupid person, maybe.

That is a direct answer to your non- point.

'ZOMG he knew what the protesters stated goal for their action was... thus he must be guilty of it too'

... said only the idiot named Fastlane.
Where did I say he must be guilty because he knew what their goal was. Show me a direct quote are just admit you are lying...again.
 
Back
Top