“Epstein files rife with uncensored nudes and victims’ names, despite redaction efforts”

With enough formaldehyde and hairspray, plus some ass bleach, all the way to 2028. Even the MAGAts don't want JD as president.

Going to Washington, DC could be called "A Weekend at Donnie's".


c3mZ4BY.png
He's dreaming of things he can have his name on.
 
I'll leave that task to others. I have enough trouble keeping track of my reading glasses. lol
No worries. Just standing against the MAGAts on JPP sends a message to others.

Over 155M Americans voted in 2024. 55% of them disapprove of Trump's actions as president, which means over 85M Americans don't approve of the Orange Jesus. Using the white nationalist "Threeper" militia logic of 3%, that means there are ~2.6M American patriots ready to take action against the traitorous MAGAt scum poisoning our nation. :)

 
So, now redactions are good? Weren't you one of those whining about how many of the documents were heavily redacted? :unsure:
You didn’t read, the release included over zealous redactions in some areas and obviously not in others were redactions were required by law. The report even cites an example where the name of an individual walking a dog is taken out to include erasing the name of the dog but nude photos of victims was let included
 
This isn't about "release" I was talking about the prosecution of the single most wanted person from the left at the time. You even today still say he's "in the files" and insist that he is prosecutable. They had four years to find one thing to prosecute him on in those files and came up empty, instead they had Letitia James stretch the law over expired statutes. We know they wanted to prosecute him, they tried myriad times, but they didn't find one thing in those files to prosecute and not even one person.

With them being incapable of finding one thing to prosecute anyone at all on, and the current group saying the same thing... well, I am surprised I am saying it, but it is very likely that there is no actionable evidence of anything that anyone can prosecute anybody on in the files.
Evidence that someone is a close friend of a child rapist and provider of children for raping, that he traveled eight times on the child rapist's and provider's private plane, isn't actionable evidence the person was a child rapist himself. So, yeah, Trump has escaped. More credit to him, yes?
 
You didn’t read, the release included over zealous redactions in some areas and obviously not in others were redactions were required by law. The report even cites an example where the name of an individual walking a dog is taken out to include erasing the name of the dog but nude photos of victims was let included
That doesn't address the point I made.
 
That doesn't address the point I made.
Sure it does, you were attempting to point out what you thought was a hypocrisy, that we bitch about redactions but say they were needed here, not relevant, the law passed by Congress specifically stated information concerning the victims was to be redacted, it wasn’t, and information relevant to individuals was not to be redacted, here the opposite happened
 
Sure it does, you were attempting to point out what you thought was a hypocrisy, that we bitch about redactions but say they were needed here, not relevant, the law passed by Congress specifically stated information concerning the victims was to be redacted, it wasn’t, and information relevant to individuals was not to be redacted, here the opposite happened
aren't victims individuals?
 
Evidence that someone is a close friend of a child rapist and provider of children for raping, that he traveled eight times on the child rapist's/provider's private plane, isn't actionable evidence the person was a child rapist himself. So, yeah, Trump has escaped. More credit to him, yes?
p.s. seeing that when it comes to the law you won't be judged by your friends.
 
“Nude photos. The names and faces of sexual abuse victims. Bank account and Social Security numbers in full view.”

“Associated Press reporters analyzing the documents have so far found multiple examples of names and other personal information of potential victims revealed. They have also found many cases of overzealous redactions.”

“The Justice Department has said staff preparing the files for release were instructed to limit redactions only to information related to victims and their families, though in many documents the names of many other people were blacked out, including lawyers and public figures.”

“That law was intended to preserve important privacy protections for Epstein’s victims. Their names were supposed to have been blacked out in documents. Their faces and bodies were supposed to be obscured in photos.”

“Mistakes have been rampant”


And we all know the one name that will never ever appear in any of the released documents

They probably spent so much time as their top priority making sure that name was totally redacted that they didn’t give a rat’s ass what else was released

And you know when the next batch is released Bondi will use this incompetence as an explanation as to why nearly everything will be blacked out, wouldn’t be surprised if this was done deliberately for that purpose
Ok so all this happened let's say.

Where is it?

Do you have a link?

No? Of course not it's all made up bullshit.

You people are gullible as fuck.
 
“Nude photos. The names and faces of sexual abuse victims. Bank account and Social Security numbers in full view.”

“Associated Press reporters analyzing the documents have so far found multiple examples of names and other personal information of potential victims revealed. They have also found many cases of overzealous redactions.”

“The Justice Department has said staff preparing the files for release were instructed to limit redactions only to information related to victims and their families, though in many documents the names of many other people were blacked out, including lawyers and public figures.”

“That law was intended to preserve important privacy protections for Epstein’s victims. Their names were supposed to have been blacked out in documents. Their faces and bodies were supposed to be obscured in photos.”

“Mistakes have been rampant”


And we all know the one name that will never ever appear in any of the released documents

They probably spent so much time as their top priority making sure that name was totally redacted that they didn’t give a rat’s ass what else was released

And you know when the next batch is released Bondi will use this incompetence as an explanation as to why nearly everything will be blacked out, wouldn’t be surprised if this was done deliberately for that purpose
Becuase it wasn't the victims they were trying to protect.
 
Back
Top