Because all humans are made in the image of God…

Well you sure are shoveling enough horse shit on us all here at JPP that we all could earn a Ph. D. in one. :laugh: I'm a doctor of medicine and a retired anesthesiologist. I went to medical school for 4 years and residency for 4 years and also did fellowship in pain management. So managing a pain like you is easy. :laugh: Don't most lawyers only go to school for 3 years or did you go to correspondence school?
So you say.
 
@FastLane has no clue even how to read research.

He/she quoted a study as proof 'legalizing marijuana was bad and citing car accident statistics, while not being able to UNDERSTAND the study he/she cited that very specifically cited they found NO difference in results both before and after.

the most important thing a Dr can do is not find and read studies but have the CAPACITY TO UNDERSTAND them and Fastlane does not possess that capacity. not even close.
She also kept pushing the disproved conspiracy theory that Pretti's gun, a Sig 320, was subject to accidental discharges in an effort to put the blame on Pretti for being shot in the back 10 times. Even if the flaws were true, which the police link disclaims they are, this doesn't justify shooting someone 10 times the back as they are already down.

@FastLane AKA @ExpressLane is a liar and a fraud.

 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
@FastLane has no clue even how to read research.

He/she quoted a study as proof 'legalizing marijuana was bad and citing car accident statistics, while not being able to UNDERSTAND the study he/she cited that very specifically cited they found NO difference in results both before and after.

the most important thing a Dr can do is not find and read studies but have the CAPACITY TO UNDERSTAND them and Fastlane does not possess that capacity. not even close.
Did I??? Link or you are lying AGAIN. :laugh:
 
Your therefore is simple-minded and invalid. One does not equate to the other. Your thinking is flawed. You have no understanding of rhetoric.

God made MAN in his images, If God is responsible for the process of evolution, that might be the process by which he made MAN. The thing GOD made did not exist until it was MAN. Can you not follow basic logic?
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Notice it does not say God created a primate in his own image.
 
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Notice it does not say God created a primate in his own image.
Genesis 1:26 - "Then God said, 'Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”

Plural. Referring to the pantheon.
 
So calling Trump an orangutan is a racist trope.

View attachment 74286
If he were black, yes. In this case it insults only Trump as he is not black. Historically black people have been called "apes" or "monkeys" by racists, thus when any black person is portrayed as a monkey it evokes that historical context. Ignoring the context and pretending that calling Trump a monkey or calling any black person a monkey is the same is just an attempt to whitewash the historical context.

You picture say, George Clooney as a monkey, it will not evoke any historical context of white people being called monkeys, it will only insult George Clooney. You do it with Whoopi Goldberg and you are insulting an entire "race" because of context.
 
If he were black, yes. In this case it insults only Trump as he is not black. Historically black people have been called "apes" or "monkeys" by racists, thus when any black person is portrayed as a monkey it evokes that historical context. Ignoring the context and pretending that calling Trump a monkey or calling any black person a monkey is the same is just an attempt to whitewash the historical context.

You picture say, George Clooney as a monkey, it will not evoke any historical context of white people being called monkeys, it will only insult George Clooney. You do it with Whoopi Goldberg and you are insulting an entire "race" because of context.
so you do see race very clearly.

Marxism depends on keeping race groups alive.
 
so you do see race very clearly.

Marxism depends on keeping race groups alive.
I see history clearly. "Race" is in quotes in my post for a reason. If you want an entire group to feel separate, it is really easy to do if you ignore historical context, laws, etc. Pretending the history didn't exist is a great start at that.
 
I see history clearly. "Race" is in quotes in my post for a reason.

that's b.s.

this is the same exact bullshit as the libs.

divide and conquer is the tactic of the marxists and the libertarians.

the end of government and "overregulation".


it should be a red flag if Dutch Monkey likes something you say.
 
that's b.s.

this is the same exact bullshit as the libs.

divide and conquer is the tactic of the marxists and the libertarians.

the end of government and "overregulation".


it should be a red flag if Dutch Monkey likes something you say.
Again. Ignoring the context which shows how these people were divided is doing what you say they want. It isn't difficult to quit being a d*ck, you just pay attention to how people were treated, then stop doing that. Nobody is talking about government here.
 
Again. Ignoring the context which shows how these people were divided is doing what you say they want. It isn't difficult to quit being a d*ck, you just pay attention to how people were treated, then stop doing that. Nobody is talking about government here.
no it isn't.

you're just doing what they want with your special joke categories.

did you see Wanda Sykess bit on how she can't hates that she can't buy a whole watermelon at the grocery store, she has to get over priced cubes from the salad bar?
 
Back
Top