$20 says it's the meth-using fake doctor.
If Alex Pretti had been
- Thread starter volsrocks
- Start date
That makes more sense than his story.$20 says it's the meth-using fake doctor.
I keep coming back to why does the alt right need to lie to support their positions?
Because they are all guilty of supporting an oath-breaking, adultering, draft-dodging pedophile and traitor for President because he supports White Nationalism.
Basically, they are admitting they cannot defend their positions with facts.
I guess... I have never seen anything like it , and I worked with people for a living.. and now do the same as a volunteer..
regular old retired teacher...Every shape, size, color, age, political persuasion....you name it.... I've worked with them..
Nobody's this crazy.... it is fascinating though.... And the stories I get to share...
I'm not.... Why do you think that?
FastLane
Verified User
You misinterpreted what I said. When I worked in the ER on a Superbowl weekend the Superbowl was pretty quiet generally. I only worked for 12 shifts from 8 am to 8 pm. ERs are the most busy in the afternoons. People did not start steaming in till the game was over and by that time I was off shift. Generally only true emergencies like MIs and Strokes came in during the games and that was hit or miss.
You are the only person I have ever heard make that claim.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You most definitely commented on my request for a definition of "Blue Wave". You indicated that "it" would only take a "ripple." My response stands, i.e. that you haven't defined anything. You're blowing wind just as @LurchAddams is.
Let me know when you have something to say that you can articulate.
Let me guess, you have no intention of saying "how things are". When Democrats fail to win the House, will your response be "things didn't stay the way they were"?
Let me know when you have something to say that you can articulate.
... which is meaningless when you won't say how things "are".
... meaning it is impossible, the condition before starting to become possible.
... but you won't say what that tiny change needs to be.
Legion are the things you did not say. Nonexistent are the things that you did say.
Just list who is going to win and who is going to lose in the midterms such that your "tiny change" is realized.
... and we all know what constitutes "a good chance" and what constitutes a "large" change vs. a "small" change.
Let me know when you have something to say that you can articulate.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I bet he is the only person with whom you have ever spoken who has worked an ER during a Super Bowl.
What do I win?
Saved by people being morons
If the election were held today, Republicans would lose the House, and maybe lose the Senate. That is the way things are. They are also getting worse for Republicans.
Hey did you hear, Andrew Moonbatten Jackass Rapist Windsor just got arrested for trading national secrets to Epstein in return for Epstein trafficking minors to him? I wonder how many people Windsor knows about - people he'd be willing to trade in return for a lighter sentence?
This is really blowing up - you know blowing up - like a Russian hooker's bladder in trump's face!
You would lose that bet. I am not sure that he has ever worked in an ER, I only have his word on that, and he is saying nonsense that is unbelievable. I have known several doctors, and a few nurses who have worked in ER's on Super Bowl Sunday, and they all say it is one of the most insane days of the year(worse than Saint Patrick's Day, better than New Years Eve.)
I have also worked as a bouncer, and helped load the lunatics into the ambulances.
Not to mention I have seen the statistics, and have enough common sense to know the dangers of alcohol.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I'm reporting you for using the word "bus" in your post. You shouldn't do that.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
This would be a great point for you to start connecting dots. At the moment, you are babbling incoherently.
Let's ask him.
Let's ask him.
Then again, why do you suppose Democrats haven't done so yet?
You have to connect the dots before you jump to completely unspecified conclusions.
You see, I keep saying - the difference between you and me - you want to protect sex traffickers and pedophiles if they're trumpists - I don't want to protect anyone accused of raping kids - IF DEMOCRATS ARE GUILTY - THEY SHOULD BURN ALONG WITH TRUMP.
But you keep ignoring that because you're terrified now that you know accountability to trump and his goons are coming - not only because of the continued "drip, drip" of the Epstein docs but because of the blue wave that's coming in response to trump's extra-Constitutional behavior.
Bu..bu..but they have Alternative Facts. That's what their Orange Messiah tells them and they believe it.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I think you're wrong. How do we determine if something we can't observe has changed?
So, by your logic, if Democrats take the House, nothing will have changed, and if Democrats fail to take the House, that will represent a change.
Did I miss anything?
... which could mean "getting better", "getting worse" or "remaining the same."
Has anyone ever told you that you need to make many posts to finally getting around to articulating a concrete point? Would I be the first? I credit you for your moment of intellectual fortitude whereby you announced your erroneous but nonetheless concrete prediction of the S&P 500's demise, but you have never returned to that same level of forthrightness.
While we're on the subject of your miscue on the S&P 500, you backpedaled and claimed that you were merely off with the date, and were going to tell us when the S&P 500 would actually fall below 5,000. It appeared that you were claiming to have "just missed" on the date, and that maybe the true demise of the S&P 500 wouldn't happen until December or even January. By what date in January 2026 at the latest will the S&P 500 fall below 5,000?