Am I correct, the Trumper’s now quietly admit

[FastLane]

I want everyone to see how Fastlane is already running away from this that he said...

What Barr did not investigate had ZERO NOTHING ZILCH to do with the unconstitutional changes that I posted about you simpleton.

Try to keep up. Have your mommy read it to you if she is in between tricks.

 

[BartenderElite]

I swear - look what Trump has done to his supporters. He has turned them all into liars, desperately trying to still "prove" that the 2020 election was rigged somehow.

 

[Jarod]

Do you have a reason for this, yet another stupid OP?
The 2020 election is over and ironically, had Trump won, you moonbats would be rid of him and on to saving the planet.

You are so gullible, I hope you don’t really believe that. If you do, maybe you should see a therapist.

 

[Jarod]

That's your problem I can read and I read where you said it was "part of the process".

If I am dumb leftists will always be dumber.

Yes, part of the process, when laws are passed that are unconstitutional, people take them to court to get them struck out. That’s the process.

 

[Jarod]

Well, evidently a judge looked at the evidence, and found it sufficient enough to issue a search warrant. Let's see, do I take the word of a judge, or some crazy whacked out leftist piece of shit on JPP? Decisions decisions.

Do you know how easy it is to get a search warrant? All you have to do is make allegations that might lead to a crime.

And, since it’s the justice department doing it, and the justice department that would punish people for doing it fraudulently… Especially this justice department cannot be trusted.

 

[Jarod]

Just another leap of faith in the wrong direction of understanding time alive since conceived hoping 90% of the population believes it is possible as 7 days a week.

Election fraud is possible, it’s also possible you might win the lottery.

 

[Jarod]

Well, evidently a judge looked at the evidence, and found it sufficient enough to issue a search warrant. Let's see, do I take the word of a judge, or some crazy whacked out leftist piece of shit on JPP? Decisions decisions.

All you need for a search warrant is a reasonable basis to suggest there might be evidence of a crime. A search warrant is one of the easiest things on the planet for a prosecutor to get.

 

[serenity]

Election fraud is possible, it’s also possible you might win the lottery.

How many ways can you explain how the fraud can take place and leave no evidence it occurred? I can figure out 4. Especially with corrupt insiders in the system. couple more through technology while the actual counting is going forward on election day.

Really isn't complicated since most of it is overlooked chasing false narratives.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Nope it wasn't thrown out for cause the issues were never heard it was thrown out for standing. Wisconsin, Pennsylvania . Michigan, and Wisconsin disenfranchised my vote.

That is the argument of an idiot. They couldn't disenfranchise your vote since you didn't vote for anyone they voted for.

You don't vote for President. You vote for your state's electoral votes. Your electoral votes were not diluted.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Prove what Paxton said was a lie. You weirdo

It is incumbent upon you to prove what Paxton said is true. The reality is that Paxton's lawsuit was ridiculous and filled with errors of law and fact.



Here is from Wiki on the idiotic lawsuit..
The suit was criticized by legal experts and called "outlandish". University of Texas School of Law law professor Stephen I. Vladeck called the suit the "craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election". Election law expert Rick Hasen characterized the lawsuit as a "press release masquerading as a lawsuit" and "the dumbest case I've ever seen filed on an emergency basis at the Supreme Court." Edward Foley, director of the election law program at Ohio State University, urged the court to ignore the case and refrain from interfering in the election.

Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School described the 11th-hour case a "Hail Mary pass" that was "creative but unlikely to win", because alleging that Texas, instead of its voters, was injured (in order to bypass the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution) is "far-fetched"; he also expressed concern that the case was filed too late.

Another Harvard Law professor, Noah Feldman, characterized the lawsuit as a coup attempt by Republicans to overturn the results of the election.


Legal experts also did not expect the Supreme Court to certify the case, given its reluctance to hear post-election challenges. On the same day as Texas's filing, the Court refused to hear arguments in another post-election challenge, Kelly v. Pennsylvania, without any dissents

 

[FastLane]

It is incumbent upon you to prove what Paxton said is true. The reality is that Paxton's lawsuit was ridiculous and filled with errors of law and fact.



Here is from Wiki on the idiotic lawsuit..
The suit was criticized by legal experts and called "outlandish". University of Texas School of Law law professor Stephen I. Vladeck called the suit the "craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election". Election law expert Rick Hasen characterized the lawsuit as a "press release masquerading as a lawsuit" and "the dumbest case I've ever seen filed on an emergency basis at the Supreme Court." Edward Foley, director of the election law program at Ohio State University, urged the court to ignore the case and refrain from interfering in the election.

Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School described the 11th-hour case a "Hail Mary pass" that was "creative but unlikely to win", because alleging that Texas, instead of its voters, was injured (in order to bypass the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution) is "far-fetched"; he also expressed concern that the case was filed too late.

Another Harvard Law professor, Noah Feldman, characterized the lawsuit as a coup attempt by Republicans to overturn the results of the election.


Legal experts also did not expect the Supreme Court to certify the case, given its reluctance to hear post-election challenges. On the same day as Texas's filing, the Court refused to hear arguments in another post-election challenge, Kelly v. Pennsylvania, without any dissents

So you think Paxton lied to a Federal Court? I don't think so

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

How many ways can you explain how the fraud can take place and leave no evidence it occurred? I can figure out 4. Especially with corrupt insiders in the system. couple more through technology while the actual counting is going forward on election day.

Really isn't complicated since most of it is overlooked chasing false narratives.

The stupidity of claiming lack of evidence proves something occurred show how delusional you are.

It's possible that you killed your neighbor and then replaced him with a look alike clone. The authorities need to raid your home and arrest you since the murder could have occurred with you leaving no evidence.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

So you think Paxton lied to a Federal Court? I don't think so

So you think the defendants lied in their response?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

64. Georgia has 16 electoral votes, with astatewide vote tally currently estimated at 2,458,121for President Trump and 2,472,098 for former VicePresident Biden, a margin of approximately 12,670votes\.
65. The number of votes affected by thevarious constitutional violations exceeds the marginof votes dividing the candidates.
66. Georgia’s Secretary of State, BradRaffensperger, without legislative approval,unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governingthe signature verification process for absentee ballots.\
67. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-386(a)(2) prohibits theopening of absentee ballots until after the polls openon Election Day: In April 2020, however, the StateElection Board adopted Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15, Processing Ballots Prior to Election Day. 21That rule purports to authorize county electionofficials to begin processing absentee ballots up tothree weeks before Election Day.\
68. Georgia law authorizes and requires asingle registrar or clerk—after reviewing the outerenvelope—to reject an absentee ballot if the voterfailed to sign the required oath or to provide therequired information, the signature appears invalid,or the required information does not conform with theinformation on file, or if the voter is otherwise foundineligible to vote. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-386(a)(1)(B)-(C).
69. Georgia law provides absentee voters thechance to “cure a failure to sign the oath, an invalidsignature, or missing information” on a ballot’s outerenvelope by the deadline for verifying provisionalballots (i.e., three days after the election). O.C.G.A. §§21-2-386(a)(1)(C), 21-2-419(c)(2). To facilitate cures,Georgia law requires the relevant election official tonotify the voter in writing: “The board of registrars orabsentee ballot clerk shall promptly notify the electorof such rejection, a copy of which notification shall beretained in the files of the board of registrars orabsentee ballot clerk for at least two years.” O.C.G.A.§ 21-2-386(a)(1)(B).
70. On March 6, 2020, in Democratic Partyof Georgia v. Raffensperger, No. 1:19-cv-5028-WMR(N.D. Ga.), Georgia’s Secretary of State entered aCompromise Settlement Agreement and Release withthe Democratic Party of Georgia (the “Settlement”) tomaterially change the statutory requirements forreviewing signatures on absentee ballot envelopes toconfirm the voter’s identity by making it far moredifficult to challenge defective signatures beyond the 22express mandatory procedures set forth at GA. CODE §21-2-386(a)(1)(B).
71. Among other things, before a ballot couldbe rejected, the Settlement required a registrar whofound a defective signature to now seek a review bytwo other registrars, and only if a majority of theregistrars agreed that the signature was defectivecould the ballot be rejected but not before all threeregistrars’ names were written on the ballot envelopealong with the reason for the rejection. Thesecumbersome procedures are in direct conflict withGeorgia’s statutory requirements, as is theSettlement’s requirement that notice be provided bytelephone (i.e., not in writing) if a telephone numberis available. Finally, the Settlement purports torequire State election officials to consider issuingguidance and training materials drafted by an expertretained by the Democratic Party of Georgia.
72. Georgia’s legislature has not ratifiedthese material changes to statutory law mandated bythe Compromise Settlement Agreement and Release,including altered signature verification requirementsand early opening of ballots. The relevant legislationthat was violated by Compromise SettlementAgreement and Release did not include a severabilityclause.
73. This unconstitutional change in Georgialaw materially benefitted former Vice PresidentBiden. According to the Georgia Secretary of State’soffice, former Vice President Biden had almost doublethe number of absentee votes (65.32%) as PresidentTrump (34.68%). See Cicchetti Decl. at ¶ 25, App. 7a8a.2374. The effect of this unconstitutionalchange in Georgia election law, which made it morelikely that ballots without matching signatures wouldbe counted, had a material impact on the outcome ofthe election.
75. Specifically, there were 1,305,659absentee mail-in ballots submitted in Georgia in 2020.There were 4,786 absentee ballots rejected in 2020.This is a rejection rate of .37%. In contrast, in 2016,the 2016 rejection rate was 6.42% with 13,677absentee mail-in ballots being rejected out of 213,033submitted, which more than seventeen times greaterthan in 2020. See Cicchetti Decl. at ¶ 24, App. 7a.
76. If the rejection rate of mailed-in absenteeballots remained the same in 2020 as it was in 2016,there would be 83,517 less tabulated ballots in 2020.The statewide split of absentee ballots was 34.68% forTrump and 65.2% for Biden. Rejecting at the higher2016 rate with the 2020 split between Trump andBiden would decrease Trump votes by 28,965 andBiden votes by 54,552, which would be a net gain forTrump of 25,587 votes. This would be more thanneeded to overcome the Biden advantage of 12,670votes, and Trump would win by 12,917 votes. Id.Regardless of the number of ballots affected, however,the non-legislative changes to the election rulesviolated the Electors Clause.

Could you point out where you think Paxton was correct about Georgia? Paxton presents no evidence.

This is nothing but speculation. With no evidence, he is making a claim. Courts tend to require actual evidence.
which made it morelikely that ballots without matching signatures wouldbe counted, had a material impact on the outcome ofthe election.

Would you care to point to the actual evidence in that bullshit from Paxton? I asked you for evidence and you simply provide me with crap that was so ridiculous the courts wouldn't even look at it.

 

[FastLane]

Could you point out where you think Paxton was correct about Georgia? Paxton presents no evidence.

This is nothing but speculation. With no evidence, he is making a claim. Courts tend to require actual evidence.
which made it morelikely that ballots without matching signatures wouldbe counted, had a material impact on the outcome ofthe election.

Would you care to point to the actual evidence in that bullshit from Paxton? I asked you for evidence and you simply provide me with crap that was so ridiculous the courts wouldn't even look at it.

You point out where Paxton was incorrect.

Did Raffensperger have the authority to do this?

Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, without legislative approval,unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.\

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

You point out where Paxton was incorrect.

Did Raffensperger have the authority to do this?

Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, without legislative approval,unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.\

Lovely statement that provides no evidence.

Here let me show you how it works -
Paxton made his filing without legislative approval - (Notice I included no evidence?)



I asked you to show where Paxton was correct and you simply point to a vague statement that doesn't show what the violation even was let alone lays out why it was a violation.

 

[LurchAddams]

Sure you do. This is related to a fair election.

So @Jarod , this is the answer I've been getting from trumptards as well: "The 2024 election was a free and fair one".

Have you noticed trumptards only have issues with elections they LOSE? Hmm mm.

 

[Jarod]

How many ways can you explain how the fraud can take place and leave no evidence it occurred? I can figure out 4. Especially with corrupt insiders in the system. couple more through technology while the actual counting is going forward on election day.

Really isn't complicated since most of it is overlooked chasing false narratives.

There is 0 evidence any significant fraud happened. It could happen, and you could win the lotto.

 

[FastLane]

Lovely statement that provides no evidence.

Here let me show you how it works -
Paxton made his filing without legislative approval - (Notice I included no evidence?)



I asked you to show where Paxton was correct and you simply point to a vague statement that doesn't show what the violation even was let alone lays out why it was a violation.

I asked you did Raffensperger, have that authority to change how Georgians death with signature verification for voting. A simple yes or no answer is a lil you need to give but you spin instead. That is because YOU KNOW only the Georgia state legislatures has the legal authority to make or change vote laws in Georgia.

 

[Jarod]

I asked you did Raffensperger, have that authority to change how Georgians death with signature verification for voting. A simple yes or no answer is a lil you need to give but you spin instead. That is because YOU KNOW only the Georgia state legislatures has the legal authority to make or change vote laws in Georgia.

Kook