Vance: Supreme Court tariff decision represents ‘lawlessness from the court’

Number Six

Chief Exit Officer (CEO)

Vice President Vance condemned the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a majority of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs on Friday.

“Today, the Supreme Court decided that Congress, despite giving the president the ability to ‘regulate imports’, didn’t actually mean it,” Vance posted on the social platform X. “This is lawlessness from the Court, plain and simple. And its only effect will be to make it harder for the president to protect American industries and supply chain resiliency.”


The vice president pointed to a “wide range of other tariff powers” still available to the president.

Vance’s statement echoed Trump’s remarks at the White House on Friday afternoon, when he said he was “ashamed of certain members of the court.”

A majority ruled against the Trump administration’s decision to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose steep tariffs on countries across the globe. The emergency measure grants the U.S. president the ability to place regulations on imports in response to “unusual and extraordinary” threats.


Two of the six justices in the majority opinion — Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch — were appointed by Trump.

The president criticized them in his Friday remarks to the press.

“I don’t want to say whether I regret nominating them. I think their decision was terrible,” Trump said. “I think it’s an embarrassment to their families.”


Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have expressed discontent with the Trump administration’s use of IEEPA to impose tariffs, pointing to Congress’ constitutional authority over federal taxation. A resolution calling for the cessation of Trump’s tariffs passed in the Senate last fall with bipartisan support.

Recent polling indicated that most Americans felt similarly, with 67 percent of respondents expressing their support for the Supreme Court to overturn these policies in a February survey.

A recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York indicated that U.S. businesses and consumers took on about 90 percent of the costs of these tariffs, despite claims from the White House that foreign countries would shoulder the majority of the financial burden.


Several Republican lawmakers have come out in support of the court’s decision Friday. Kentucky’s GOP Sens. Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell — who both voted in favor of passing the Senate resolution last October — commended the ruling.

Paul, who sponsored the resolution, called the ruling a “defense of our Republic” in a post on X.

McConnell said in a statement that the court’s decision leaves “no room for doubt” on the issue of Congress’s constitutional authority over tariffs.


“Congress’ role in trade policy, as I have warned repeatedly, is not an inconvenience to avoid,” McConnell said. “If the executive would like to enact trade policies that impact American producers and consumers, its path forward is crystal clear: convince their representatives under Article 1.”
 

Vice President Vance condemned the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a majority of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs on Friday.

“Today, the Supreme Court decided that Congress, despite giving the president the ability to ‘regulate imports’, didn’t actually mean it,” Vance posted on the social platform X. “This is lawlessness from the Court, plain and simple. And its only effect will be to make it harder for the president to protect American industries and supply chain resiliency.”


The vice president pointed to a “wide range of other tariff powers” still available to the president.

Vance’s statement echoed Trump’s remarks at the White House on Friday afternoon, when he said he was “ashamed of certain members of the court.”

A majority ruled against the Trump administration’s decision to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose steep tariffs on countries across the globe. The emergency measure grants the U.S. president the ability to place regulations on imports in response to “unusual and extraordinary” threats.


Two of the six justices in the majority opinion — Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch — were appointed by Trump.

The president criticized them in his Friday remarks to the press.

“I don’t want to say whether I regret nominating them. I think their decision was terrible,” Trump said. “I think it’s an embarrassment to their families.”


Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have expressed discontent with the Trump administration’s use of IEEPA to impose tariffs, pointing to Congress’ constitutional authority over federal taxation. A resolution calling for the cessation of Trump’s tariffs passed in the Senate last fall with bipartisan support.

Recent polling indicated that most Americans felt similarly, with 67 percent of respondents expressing their support for the Supreme Court to overturn these policies in a February survey.

A recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York indicated that U.S. businesses and consumers took on about 90 percent of the costs of these tariffs, despite claims from the White House that foreign countries would shoulder the majority of the financial burden.


Several Republican lawmakers have come out in support of the court’s decision Friday. Kentucky’s GOP Sens. Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell — who both voted in favor of passing the Senate resolution last October — commended the ruling.

Paul, who sponsored the resolution, called the ruling a “defense of our Republic” in a post on X.

McConnell said in a statement that the court’s decision leaves “no room for doubt” on the issue of Congress’s constitutional authority over tariffs.


“Congress’ role in trade policy, as I have warned repeatedly, is not an inconvenience to avoid,” McConnell said. “If the executive would like to enact trade policies that impact American producers and consumers, its path forward is crystal clear: convince their representatives under Article 1.”
It's apparent that both Crazy Trump and Vance are interested in trashing the constitution and instituting Trumpian law just like the enabling act of 1933.
 
I wonder if he is ever embarrassed at having to perform like a trained monkey for Trump
the court is leading this nation into self destruction keeping context in control of content evolving in a natural algorithm humanity doesn't address daily here.

Vance and Trump are 50% accurate.
If Vance had any dignity he wouldn't be subservient to a POS the likes of Crazy Trump.
 
If Vance had any dignity he wouldn't be subservient to a POS the likes of Crazy Trump.
Your definition of sane is ignoring all you have been since conceived just to fit in social consensus of the beliefs life can exist 7 days a week everyone else alive now pretends they don't know their genetic origin was date of conception and every society only marks date of birth in factual history of being alive now.
 
Your definition of sane is ignoring all you have been since conceived just to fit in social consensus of the beliefs life can exist 7 days a week everyone else alive now pretends they don't know their genetic origin was date of conception and every society only marks date of birth in factual history of being alive now.
OMG
 
Remember, Noking, serenity is not wired properly.
Every brain is wired to adapting one at time in plain sight biological results are eternally separated while adapting as displaced since conception.

every social mind is programmed by their contextual methods of communicating after birth to ignore why they exist one at a time now.

You tell me why humanity cannot sustain peace daily here when everyone governing 7 tomorrows a week never accepts life doesn't exceed series parallel time their heart is beating here now.

Biological zero sum gain of ancestry so far by the ancestors inhabiting time daily here.

That self evident truth even America doesn't support anymore. Building 7 hypothetical tomorrows each heart beat added now corrupts each great great grandchild becoming 1 of 16 great great grandparents 4 more generations after birth.

History repeating itself through rule of law. I discovered actual freedom from established reasonable doubt and every citizen of humanity finds it offensive to their character's superiority honoring mind over matter semantics.
 

The Pedophile Protector.​


the-pedophile-protector-v0-pzwvv19pd2kg1.jpeg
 

Vice President Vance condemned the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down a majority of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs on Friday.

“Today, the Supreme Court decided that Congress, despite giving the president the ability to ‘regulate imports’, didn’t actually mean it,” Vance posted on the social platform X. “This is lawlessness from the Court, plain and simple. And its only effect will be to make it harder for the president to protect American industries and supply chain resiliency.”


The vice president pointed to a “wide range of other tariff powers” still available to the president.

Vance’s statement echoed Trump’s remarks at the White House on Friday afternoon, when he said he was “ashamed of certain members of the court.”

A majority ruled against the Trump administration’s decision to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose steep tariffs on countries across the globe. The emergency measure grants the U.S. president the ability to place regulations on imports in response to “unusual and extraordinary” threats.


Two of the six justices in the majority opinion — Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch — were appointed by Trump.

The president criticized them in his Friday remarks to the press.

“I don’t want to say whether I regret nominating them. I think their decision was terrible,” Trump said. “I think it’s an embarrassment to their families.”


Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have expressed discontent with the Trump administration’s use of IEEPA to impose tariffs, pointing to Congress’ constitutional authority over federal taxation. A resolution calling for the cessation of Trump’s tariffs passed in the Senate last fall with bipartisan support.

Recent polling indicated that most Americans felt similarly, with 67 percent of respondents expressing their support for the Supreme Court to overturn these policies in a February survey.

A recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York indicated that U.S. businesses and consumers took on about 90 percent of the costs of these tariffs, despite claims from the White House that foreign countries would shoulder the majority of the financial burden.


Several Republican lawmakers have come out in support of the court’s decision Friday. Kentucky’s GOP Sens. Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell — who both voted in favor of passing the Senate resolution last October — commended the ruling.

Paul, who sponsored the resolution, called the ruling a “defense of our Republic” in a post on X.

McConnell said in a statement that the court’s decision leaves “no room for doubt” on the issue of Congress’s constitutional authority over tariffs.


“Congress’ role in trade policy, as I have warned repeatedly, is not an inconvenience to avoid,” McConnell said. “If the executive would like to enact trade policies that impact American producers and consumers, its path forward is crystal clear: convince their representatives under Article 1.”
A piece of wet cardboard has more charisma than J.D. Vance.

1771936267924.png
 
Back
Top